Which is more of a turnon?

Anonymous or Known

  • Anonymous

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • Known

    Votes: 19 95.0%

  • Total voters
    20
Lime said:
Gimme the real thing; a real woman, not some FHA (famous hollywood actress). I don't want pix in either case.

Lime
I agree. But remember that FHAs and FAPs (Famous Attractive People) in general are real women too.

The only difference is that you are more likely to see them nekkid on picture, and much less likely to see them nekkid in real life.
 
dr_mabeuse wrote
Do people still even look at nudie pics anymore?

I highly recommend Roy Stuart's Volume and Two from Taschen for highly charged erotic photography. Lots of story inducing photos and scenarios.


Two beautiful nudies from the kissing gallery at freddyandeddy.com
 
I'm gonna blush...

Boxlicker101, Thank you, you too are very kind.:) :rose: I figured that I'd made it to 300 posts and it was about time to "come out".
 
dr_mabeuse said:
Do people still even look at nudie pics anymore?

What about those ones where they hold a beachball in front? Or hide behind an umbrella?

I'm with Og. I like clothes and attitude and my imagination.

---dr.M.

Obviously, people do look at nudie pics. Otherwise, how do you explain the continuing popularity of magazines like Playboy. I know, I know, the articles, etc. Maybe so but mostly the pics. Not to mention the pics available on these forums, such as the one Rain just posted. They get thusands of views, from the rather limited audience that reads these threads.

Randi Grail said:

I agree. But remember that FHAs and FAPs (Famous Attractive People) in general are real women too.

The only difference is that you are more likely to see them nekkid on picture, and much less likely to see them nekkid in real life.



Obviously that's true but I still think of them as being non-real. First, because they often are very artificial, with silicon and other artifices, and I know that makeup and clever lighting provides a lot of the glamour. Personally, I would rather look at the AV of Tatelou or Honey or Sweet or Lucky or Dita when she isn't smoking, even though she has every right to rot out her lungs if that is her wish.

:)
:rose: :rose: :rose:
 
Box, you made me laugh. I still enjoy smoking, and I don't want to live all that long ;) . If I didn't smoke I wouldn't have had my cigarette lit by a real gentleman last night as I sipped Champagne on the balcony of our symphony hall, and had a pleasurable conversation about Beethoven and opera.

Perdita
 
dr_mabeuse said:
Do people still even look at nudie pics anymore?

What about those ones where they hold a beachball in front? Or hide behind an umbrella?

I'm with Og. I like clothes and attitude and my imagination.

---dr.M.

Oh yes, absolutely. As a self-confessed semi-lurker on the AmPics board, I can tell you that visual erotica is still alive and thriving, although the trend these days in internet porn is pushing very heavily toward amateurs, both real and imagined.

People aren't necessarily tired of seeing beautiful people, but they are getting tired of seeing 'professional' beautiful people, even if the people they're viewing are only amateur in their fantasies.

Captain Stabbin, Big Naturals, The Bang Bus, MILFHunter and Mike's Apartment, most of which are featured on Lit's Free Adult Pictures of the Day page all purport to showcase 'amateur' girls doing the nasty. These are supposed to be random girls off the street conned, tricked, or just plain asked to perform on camera. Personally, I never believed a word of that, but there's something erotic to me about suspending disbelief that the hottie you saw in the grocery store yesterday is capable of fulfilling your wildest sexual fantasies.
 
perdita said:
Box, you made me laugh. I still enjoy smoking, and I don't want to live all that long ;) . If I didn't smoke I wouldn't have had my cigarette lit by a real gentleman last night as I sipped Champagne on the balcony of our symphony hall, and had a pleasurable conversation about Beethoven and opera.

Perdita


:) Hi. Dita. I smoked for a long time, and sometimes I enjoyed it too, until I finally decided to quit. Lighting a lady's cigarette as you describe can be a good icebreaker too. Did the gentleman sip Champagne from your slipper in the classical way?:rose:
 
There are a hell of a lot of good-looking people out there, famous or not famous. I prefer to see someone in the flesh the most, personally.

Oh, and those two guys that you posted HCT Rain. VVVV HOT!! I was talking about a strange phenomenon with my friend the other day. We both like to see guys kissing but guys having sex is not as sexy as guys kissing, for some strange reason. Maybe it's because my roots in male-male action comes from reading Anne Rice, where there's primarily vampire sucky stuff going on (with no penises involved)
 
Boxlicker101 said:
Did the gentleman sip Champagne from your slipper in the classical way?:rose:
Box, you always go too far. :rolleyes: (Like I would tell you ;) ). P.
---------------

Marsipanne, I like your name and "vampire sucky stuff" (as a phrase).

Perdita :)
 
I like this thread

I like this thread, a lot of good points being made.

Ogg, it's very true about the imagination. If it wasn't why would so many people be buying Lingerie? (And yes according to something I read a while back it's mainly men who buy this for their S.O.'s.)

As for the professional versus Amatuer aspecs. I personaly prefer the Am. Maybe it's because those slight blemishes are what make the person real to me. Maybe the breasts sag and aren't the size of Soccer Balls. Maybe she has a slight bulge in the belly or love handles. Maybe the behind isn't as taught as a Pfc.'s bed in Boot Camp. Hell, maybe she has a bit of razor stubble. This just makes them more real to me, which allows me to use my imagination a bit more.
My wife feels the same way. She doesn't want to see some guy built like Arnold and hung like an ox. She knows that's not the norm.
One of the stories I wrote which is my wifes favorite concerns a three way with a woman who lived upstairs from us. She was a tiny little asian woman who had a small scar near her left eye as well as stretch marks from having kids when she was younger. Those marks just made her more beautiful to us because they showed character. You will never find marks like that in the "Professional" pics.

Cat
 
Going back to the original question - and noting that the poll response so far is unanymously for the known person - I wonder why that is the case.

I know my own answer.

The difference is that while both lead to fantasies, with someone I know, then I have context, can plan strategies, and - if she said yes - then it could become reality.

With the unknown, famous person, I 'know' I won't meet them. On the occasion I did meet Prince Philip, I was so gob-smacked by the fact itself that I was speechless - and know that would be the case with any celebrity (possibly with the exception of being introduced by a mutual acquaintance - but since I have no acquaintances who know celebrities, that ain't gonna happen!)

In consequence, I can't plan, envisage, imagine, any credible scenario of getting off with a celebrity. It's unreal - and for me that means it doesn't hit my gonads.

Sure I can look at an erotic pic of some celebrity and jack off, but it would be the movements of my hand that would get me off, not the possibility that I might really get my leg over.

Why did the other 17 of you vote the same way I did?

f5 (curious)
 
raphy said:
Oh yes, absolutely. As a self-confessed semi-lurker on the AmPics board, I can tell you that visual erotica is still alive and thriving, although the trend these days in internet porn is pushing very heavily toward amateurs, both real and imagined.

People aren't necessarily tired of seeing beautiful people, but they are getting tired of seeing 'professional' beautiful people, even if the people they're viewing are only amateur in their fantasies.

Captain Stabbin, Big Naturals, The Bang Bus, MILFHunter and Mike's Apartment, most of which are featured on Lit's Free Adult Pictures of the Day page all purport to showcase 'amateur' girls doing the nasty. These are supposed to be random girls off the street conned, tricked, or just plain asked to perform on camera. Personally, I never believed a word of that, but there's something erotic to me about suspending disbelief that the hottie you saw in the grocery store yesterday is capable of fulfilling your wildest sexual fantasies.


What is the AMpic board?
 
mcfb.

your question mixes two issues, beauty/sexiness and familiarity.

suppose the latter is the main issue, then...

for clarity, it should imho say, which pictures are more arousing, those of a beautiful unknown woman or a beautiful known woman.

To that, I'd say the former because of the fantasy factor. But with one qualification.

The qualification is that the latter would of course be more arousing if accompanied by a note suggesting a desire for hot sex with me, and that that desire is shown in the pics and in the sending of them. Here the real may trump the fantasy.

J.
 
Back
Top