I think the revulsion toward the federal government, mainstream media (which frequently shills for the former) and Hillary are indeed related. Many people are disgusted with a PC government that tries to tell us such whoppers are "Islam means peace" (no, it means submission), that radical Islam has nothing to do with Islam, that results that have disparate outcomes are "raaaacist", and that if you like your insurance you can keep it (while counting on the "stupidity" of the American people to jam their health care system through). Exactly the kind of pernicious, two-faced nonsense we could have expected from Hillary.
Trump's language about women did bother me- but I grew up with it (boys I knew in my youth said worse but, sadly, didn't have the money that Trump did). "Liberals" (actually statists who think they have some right to run everyone's lives) seemed unconcerned about a president's behavior toward women when they elected a probable rapist and serial philanderer (Bill Clinton).
I doubt your contention that the GOP establishment thinks they can control Trump. They didn't want him as their standard bearer- GOP elites would have preferred a pastel RINO like Romney or almost anyone to Trump, who was the "common man's" choice. The fact that you make such fatuous claims without any substantiation is evidence that your opinions have a tenuous basis in reality.
While I am not a yuge fan of Brietbart, I'd sooner rely on them than MSNBC or CNN. Breitbart at least has the integrity to makes its biases clear.
Last edited:
