4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
Our taxes are too low and we're still recovering from a recession. It's not hard to figure out.
tee hee
tee hee
Taxes were the answer in France!
Economic-fucking-miracle on the Seine!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Our taxes are too low and we're still recovering from a recession. It's not hard to figure out.
And of course lives will be saved, at least in the short term, almost definitely in the long run as well.
You know this thread is about keeping people from jumping off bridges right Cap'n One-Note?
Our taxes are too low and we're still recovering from a recession. It's not hard to figure out.
So it has nothing at all to do with spending money on extremely expensive projects that benefit very few people and provide questionable benefit at all to anyone? My feeling is that a person that truly wants to die is going to find a way to do just that. It's not all that difficult to accomplish. So spending millions on a net that causes someone to choose a different way to end their life sounds like a good use of public funds to you? Not me.
I'm gong to make a statement right now re. the net.
Not one single life is going to be saved, not one. Those hell bent on taking their own lives will just go elsewhere. Further, this contraption is going to bring with it problems of its own. Attention seekers now know they can leap the rail in relative safety, so they will. Tying up even more city resources yanking their sorry asses out of the net. And you watch the city count those morons as "lives saved." Bullshit, they never intended to die to begin with, they knew that net was there.
I also hope that the net is designed to completely entrap the jumper, otherwise they'll just crawl out of the net and finish the job. Wheeeeeeee, a twofer.
One, huge, waste of taxpayers money.
Ishmael
If it just saves ONE life!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Liberals want to save lives.
What gives them the right to tell a person what to do with their own body?
One life,
One love...,
That doesn't address the topic.
Let's run with the premise that people will kill themselves anyway, how much does it cost to deal with people using the bridge?
Nothing.
Sharks got to eat to, same as the buzzards and the worms.
The cop patrolling the bridge to stop suicides wasn't working for free. That's just off the top of my head.
I have a feeling they don't just leave bodies in the water. That's more of a Jersey thing.
Cops working to stop thieves don't work for free.
Traffic cops don't work for free.
Cops are not proactive, they are reactive. We pay them to fish bodies out of all sorts of situations...
![]()
Gonna build a big fence around the Mississippi?
People drown there on a regular basis...
![]()
Gonna outlaw Blue Oyster Cult for Season Don't Fear the Reaper?
ME 262 is a German jet…
http://www.wwiivehicles.com/germany/aircraft/fighters/messerschmitt-me-262-fighter/messerschmitt-me-262-fighter-45.png
Jumpin' Geronimo!
What does it cost the city of SF when someone jumps from the bridge?
I would guess it depends on three things.
Is the person a resident of SF?
What does the person make?
What tax bracket is the person in?
That's an excellent point. When you have to pay a cop to work the bridge to prevent suicides that takes a cop off of working crime, traffic or whatever.
You brought up traffic cops & they are proactive. They do DUI stops and usually announce before major holidays that they'll be out in force so people don't speed or drive under the influence.
You're still actively avoiding the point. What does it cost the city of SF when someone jumps from the bridge? I don't really expect you to know, but that's kind of my point.
I do get your point.
I also understand that all we ever hear from your point of view is "the crumbling infrastructure" and the need for more taxes.
What in the hell is the cost of maintaining a net?
Or, if it saves JUST ONE LIFE...
![]()
Is that then a justifiable reason to raise taxes yet again when we know that within just a few years of weather that we're going to be crying about the crumbling social safety net under the bridge?