Why does Erika Kirk keep wiping away nonexistent tears?

Weaponized public emotion

She stops and applies something to her eyes and starts crying before she walks out on stage. The tissues were probably dipped in a chemical that causes tears.
Are you devoid of human emotions so you think she must be as well?
 
Are you devoid of human emotions so you think she must be as well?
I don't knee jerk with my emotions like 99% of people do to emotive political propaganda. I am very well-versed in the government and mainstream media's sordid history of duplicity and manipulation. I don't automatically take everything at face value, and I know when to take things with a grain of salt.

The national news media is the malevolent propaganda arm of the ruling class.

Thousands of other people have called out Erika Kirk for what they believe to be disingenuous emotions.
 
Last edited:
I don't knee jerk with my emotions like 99% of people do to emotive political propaganda. I am very well-versed in the government and mainstream media's history of duplicity and manipulation. I don't automatically take everything at face value, and I know when to take things with a grain of salt.

The national news media is the malevolent propaganda arm of the ruling class.

Thousands of other people have called out Erika Kirk for what they believe to be disingenuous emotions.
I appreciate your first 2 paragraphs. I respectfully disagree with your third paragraph. You are entitled to your own opinion and I hope you continue to think for yourself. Have a nice Saturday.
 
Something about Erika has always rubbed me the wrong way. I cannot put my finger on it, but there's something off about her.
 
Something about Erika has always rubbed me the wrong way. I cannot put my finger on it, but there's something off about her.
Even if you do put your finger on it she will not get off if you rub it the wrong way.
 
Her grief may or may not be genunine, who knows. Who knows what their relationship was really like behind closed doors. We DO know that Charlie Kirk was a notorious bigot, hatemonger, who believed women to be little better than Government controlled breeding stock- and maybe she had been tiring of his hateful, misogynistic and bigoted attitudes. All I know is, Charlie Kirk is dead, the world is honestly a better place without him and hopefully she will be able to step out from his shadow and maybe, even grow to denounce some of the things he stood for.
"Who knows what their relationship was really like"-----your words, and yet you spew your own personal opinion and your obvious hatred for another human being who is dead. You are a thousand times worse than what you claim Charlie Kirk was about. I am not here to defend him one way or the other but you on the other hand are a pathetic excuse for a human being. You are certainly entitled to your opinion but there is no need to pound on your keyboard and show what type of human you really are. Go back to your dingy room down in mommies basement and pretend your IQ is greater than your shoe size.
 
I cannot defend what Charlie Kirk represented or what he stood for or what he was. You want me to eulogize him? Say he was a kind man? A good man? He was not. He was a disgusting human being. That is not going to change just because he was murdered. Richard Butler, head of the Aryan Nations, is also dead, so is Fred Phelps (Westboro Baptist Church.). Both held similar views to Charlie Kirk. Do you hear anyone shed any tears for them? No, and neither should we shed any tears for Charlie Kirk. I do have a feeling that Erika Kirk was likely abused and mistreated in her marriage, based on her husband's beliefs and what he stood for. She is finally free to find her own way, free from that toxic environment. I do not see why you are criticizing me by the way. You call yourself a "nurse with pretty legs" but are you even a female? I suspect not. (Maybe yet another Hisarpy/Glamorilla/latecomer account, perhaps?) Or else, maybe you prefer to be in a marriage where you are treated as little more than breeding stock by your husband, since that's exactly how your precious Charlie Kirk thought all women should be treated.
 
I cannot defend what Charlie Kirk represented or what he stood for or what he was. You want me to eulogize him? Say he was a kind man? A good man? He was not. He was a disgusting human being. That is not going to change just because he was murdered. Richard Butler, head of the Aryan Nations, is also dead, so is Fred Phelps (Westboro Baptist Church.). Both held similar views to Charlie Kirk. Do you hear anyone shed any tears for them? No, and neither should we shed any tears for Charlie Kirk. I do have a feeling that Erika Kirk was likely abused and mistreated in her marriage, based on her husband's beliefs and what he stood for. She is finally free to find her own way, free from that toxic environment. I do not see why you are criticizing me by the way. You call yourself a "nurse with pretty legs" but are you even a female? I suspect not. (Maybe yet another Hisarpy/Glamorilla/latecomer account, perhaps?) Or else, maybe you prefer to be in a marriage where you are treated as little more than breeding stock by your husband, since that's exactly how your precious Charlie Kirk thought all women should be treated.
Thank you for putting words in my mouth. You call yourself PaxNurgle but are you even a human being? I suspect not. I suspect if you are a male then your balls must be on the small end of the size scale. I am not married because of life events I had no control over. Even though Ericka Kirk does not meet your rules and regulations for how a human being should act, she seems to be wise enough to find a very good, local divorce attorney if she felt she was being "abused and mistreated in her marriage" and that her husband "believed women to be little better than Government controlled breeding stock". I am not "criticizing" you "by the way", I am just stating my opinion that you are a brave and bold keyboard warrior in the hovel you live in who came here to stir the pot. S.F.B.
 
Why does Erika Kirk keep wiping away nonexistent tears?

Her behavior seems very off for someone who is supposed to be a grieving widow. I have not seen any REAL tears coming out of her eyes, or any of the other physiological effects that go along with crying like nasal congestion, red/swollen eyes, square lip, etc.. etc..

They are not non-existent. You are a mean-spirited jackass lacking in compassion, decency, and principles.

I am a widower; I find it deeply offensive the way people constantly attack Erika Kirk.
 
Back
Top