Why liberals hate Amy Coney Barrett

I say pack the hell out of the court if the dems get the house, senate and presidency then pass a law changing the lifetime appointment to 16 years. There’s nothing in the constitution to establish a number of SCJ’s. grandfather current justices that have surpassed 16 years for another 4 and those under get the remainder of the years they have to reach 16. Lifetime appointment is ridiculous.

While we’re at it lets 4 term house members and 3 term senators too.
 
I say pack the hell out of the court if the dems get the house, senate and presidency then pass a law changing the lifetime appointment to 16 years. There’s nothing in the constitution to establish a number of SCJ’s. grandfather current justices that have surpassed 16 years for another 4 and those under get the remainder of the years they have to reach 16. Lifetime appointment is ridiculous.

While we’re at it lets 4 term house members and 3 term senators too.

Why do you hate democracy so much???:confused:
 
Trump looks like he created the perfect storm for Dems to take back the White House and the Senate:)

Well, this is what "stupid" causes so bye bye!
 
Trump looks like he created the perfect storm for Dems to take back the White House and the Senate:)

Well, this is what "stupid" causes so bye bye!

Should be...yet every time he does (D)'s go "HOLD MY BEER!!!" and do something fucking retarded like burn one of their cities down and then praise/release the dipshits who did it so they can go destroy some more businesses, jobs and homes.

BLATANTLY violate the civil rights of your residents then give the courts the finger until FBI is stopping civil wars from popping off....smooth!!

LOL

All (D)'s had to do to win was not run the worst possible candidates they could find and stop being snooty white guilt/racist "woke" shit stains for 2 seconds, the WHOLE COUNTRY would have gone blue. Tulsi on a liberal platform I'd have been all in. Take my money and vote!!

But that would have asking too much....so Trump is still very much in the game because everyone outside the "woke progressives'" bubble, thinks y'all have come totally unglued and so have the (D)'s for taking up their cause. :)
 
Last edited:
LOL you don't know what packing the court is either....I was actually a bit surprised by that, you're usually one of the ones who is on their political game.

Filling vacancies =/= packing the court.

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/packing-the-supreme-court-explained

I understand the classic definition, but the result is the same. Some may even say blocking nominees from getting a vote is even worse. The courts should be balanced.

I’ve read arguments for raiding the number of judges to 19 or more, so it’s not absolute bedlam when a Justice passes.
 
Why "Liberals" hate...

The reason they hate ACB is basically the same reason they can not discuss alternate viewpoints without name calling. They are filled with hate. Why? They have been brainwashed into believing that they are smarter than most other people. They look down on those that disagree with their views and when they can't muster a logical response all that comes out is the hate. Where does the hate come from? The same people that brainwashed them into thinking they are "special" also pumped them full of hate. They have been brainwashed into believing that most people are racists. They believe the USA is systemically racist. They believe in fake science that tells them that mankind is heating up the planet and therefore fossil fuel must be stopped. Those that disagree are evil. They are good, righteous, liberal, smart, and got gold stars when they were in school. Other people are wrong and bad. Cops are bad. White people are bad. Orange man bad. 24/7/365 the fake news media pumps this shit into their brains. Over and over until there is nothing left but hate. It is the same trick Hitler used and all socialist movements depend on. It doesn't matter who they hate... it just matters that they hate.
 
I understand the classic definition, but the result is the same.

In some ways, not all though, one is a far more blatant power grab than the other.

Some may even say blocking nominees from getting a vote is even worse.

Only the ones not getting the nominees they want. Otherwise you know damn well the partisans tunes will do a 180 when their power positions are reversed, we've already seen both sides do it repeatedly over the last 20 years and further back.

'It's always good when my party does it, but it's a terrible threat to democracy and blah blah *insert appropriate fear mongering* blah blah when the other side does it."

The courts should be balanced.

Define "balanced".....because for most that means a wholesale lopsided bias or advantage in their favor, a cudgel to beat the other side with.

Nobody really LIKES balance just like most folks don't actually want equality or fairness or justice.

I’ve read arguments for raiding the number of judges to 19 or more, so it’s not absolute bedlam when a Justice passes.

The number of justices on the court will not stop the bedlam from the side that's not controlling who's seating justices.

Only people getting over the fact that democracy and separation of powers means not always getting your way, will stop that.

House/Senate privileges are real and until we undergo a TOTAL restructuring of our government, that's the system and the various parties of power are just going to have to get over the fact that because democracy and all the various levels of checks put on it, it's an exceedingly rare thing for one party to get total power....as it should be IMO.
 
Last edited:
How does appointing SJC’s to a limited term instead of a lifetime appointment interfere with democracy? The president is term limited.

Term limits as you suggest for the house and senate and the one we have on our POTUS are anti-democratic.

A democratic "term limit" IS the election. It's a chance every 2, 4 or 6 years for the people to officially and with effective legal force say "We love it, keep up the good work!" or...."YOU'RE FIRED!" and term limits go against that by removing the option for the people to keep the officials who they like.

If I have an awesome representative/executive I would like the option to keep them if they want to keep serving....

As for the justices, whatever, they aren't part of the democratic processes and shouldn't be, they aren't representatives or legislators, quite the opposite they are in a lot of ways there to keep that clown world in check.
 
Last edited:
I understand the classic definition, but the result is the same. Some may even say blocking nominees from getting a vote is even worse. The courts should be balanced.

I’ve read arguments for raiding the number of judges to 19 or more, so it’s not absolute bedlam when a Justice passes.

I think you’re misled, courts should be neutral and legislators should legislate.
 
The reason they hate ACB is basically the same reason they can not discuss alternate viewpoints without name calling. They are filled with hate. Why? They have been brainwashed into believing that they are smarter than most other people. They look down on those that disagree with their views and when they can't muster a logical response all that comes out is the hate. Where does the hate come from? The same people that brainwashed them into thinking they are "special" also pumped them full of hate. They have been brainwashed into believing that most people are racists. They believe the USA is systemically racist. They believe in fake science that tells them that mankind is heating up the planet and therefore fossil fuel must be stopped. Those that disagree are evil. They are good, righteous, liberal, smart, and got gold stars when they were in school. Other people are wrong and bad. Cops are bad. White people are bad. Orange man bad. 24/7/365 the fake news media pumps this shit into their brains. Over and over until there is nothing left but hate. It is the same trick Hitler used and all socialist movements depend on. It doesn't matter who they hate... it just matters that they hate.

Well, lets be fair here- everything YOU disagree with, you call "Fake news." Any presentation of facts that present Donald Trump (or any other authoritarian leader) in a bad light are "Fake News." Any real examples of racism of racial or social injustice- oh no, that cant happen in My America (ironic coming from a Russian troll who has never even BEEN to America)- well, that's "Fake News." So science proves global warming is real, and has proven this time and time again- well, hmmm.. "oh yeah, that must be "Fake Science."

You see, it's just intellectually dishonest, to cry "Fake" every time true facts dont jive with your little imaginary world. I mean, you can't even have an honest intellectual discussion here, there's just no starting point. Like, what do you say to a grown adult who believes that the Tooth Fairy controls the world economy, WWE wresting is not staged, and the world bank is actually run by Homer Simpson ? Some of the shit you post, literally makes as much sense as that.

You've done nothing but troll this foum- under what, like six different user names now? for the last four years And always posting the same ignorant drivel- this is NOT name calling- it's just a fact, it's what you do. As a forum troll, you refuse to see you abhorrant your views really are (although I'm sure deep down you know), so that's why it's no surprise people call you out on it.
 
Back
Top