Why was the Pete thread removed?

I am a little worried that it was because I posted a few personal details about him, but it was information he had shared openly on the board. My intention was only that those were things he'd be unlikely to lie about if he did come back, and it would be helpful to recognize him.

Even then, I think I should have just been given a warning and had my post edited. Unless elle wanted it gone, it should have stayed up.
 
I am a little worried that it was because I posted a few personal details about him, but it was information he had shared openly on the board. My intention was only that those were things he'd be unlikely to lie about if he did come back, and it would be helpful to recognize him.

Even then, I think I should have just been given a warning and had my post edited. Unless elle wanted it gone, it should have stayed up.

The details you gave could be found in threads he himself started.
 
I am a little worried that it was because I posted a few personal details about him, but it was information he had shared openly on the board. My intention was only that those were things he'd be unlikely to lie about if he did come back, and it would be helpful to recognize him.

Even then, I think I should have just been given a warning and had my post edited. Unless elle wanted it gone, it should have stayed up.

Bizzare when you think what's posted here at times. :confused:
 
The details you gave could be found in threads he himself started.

Thank you. That's helpful context. I'm not sure if that's what it was, but I think it was probably against the rules. Still, you're right, it was in the titles of his first handful of recent threads. All the more reason for a warning and an edit, if my post was the offender.

Bizzare when you think what's posted here at times. :confused:

I trust Laurelle to steer the ship and think she does an excellent job, but it is disappointing that busybody can post multiple racist screeds a day while a thread attempting to call out a predatory fuck for what he is gets insta-nuked.

Oh well. This can be the new fuck pete thread.

For anyone who missed it, lowercase pete is a predatory, lying scumbag.
 
Given what -I think- transpired at the end, that information was highly personal and sensitive.
As a bystander I'm glad that they erased the thread.
Especially since the thread had plenty of views, the message had already been spread.
 
someone reported it - i am guessing the ladyfriends he is still schmoozing

which is weird cause of all the nastiness that is spread by this forum, that was a bit light on nastiness
 
Given what -I think- transpired at the end, that information was highly personal and sensitive.
As a bystander I'm glad that they erased the thread.
Especially since the thread had plenty of views, the message had already been spread.

'Bystanders'(hence the name) usually arent involved in any way.
That generally means they dont try multiple times In a vain effort to be the centre of attention whilst 'rubber necking'. You need to work more on your bystandarding.
 
But guys, think. He's not the only one, by far who'll end up being harmed by the public disclosure. If I were you, I'd consider other means.
And with this, I'm off this topic for good.
 
'Bystanders'(hence the name) usually arent involved in any way.
That generally means they dont try multiple times In a vain effort to be the centre of attention whilst 'rubber necking'. You need to work more on your bystandarding.

You aren't very bright to suss the enormous difference between the initial scenario that we were all given, and the final one. I'm actually well intended and worried at this point but go ahead, continue with more revealing details if you like. Why would anyone want to stop a train crash?
 
I am assuming that it probably had something to do with one or both of these rules, though considering what else I have seen posted and remains on the board, I am surprised that thread got pulled, tbh.

4. You may not post personal information of other members or, for that matter, anyone else. We do not allow phone numbers, email addresses, private messages or quotes from private emails to be posted on the forum. This rule also covers real names, employment info, and any other personal information that we deem inappropriate.

5. Do not threaten other people. Do not post images or words directly or indirectly implying threats of physical harm.

Fair do's but why nuke the whole thread. Tell us Laurelle they cried!
 
You aren't very bright to suss the enormous difference between the initial scenario that we were all given, and the final one. I'm actually well intended and worried at this point but go ahead, continue with more revealing details if you like. Why would anyone want to stop a train crash?

Yawwwn...

Hehehehehe, SillyTwat

Points for 'originality' you waskiwy wabbit... You originally seemed like a asswart and i'll stand by my original assessment.
:D
 
It takes two to tango.

Why aren't elle and pete both considered scumbags?
 
Perhaps it was removed because it had done its job, but had the residual potential to cause the site legal problems?
 
Back
Top