Tend to agree. In my "back portfolio" there are any number of half-finished things waiting for... well, you name it... ideas, amendments of various kinds... but mainly inspiration.
Discarding may lead to quite sincere regret!
Wife stripped by stranger in front of hubby
- Thread starter rjhsteel
- Start date
Tend to agree. In my "back portfolio" there are any number of half-finished things waiting for... well, you name it... ideas, amendments of various kinds... but mainly inspiration.
Discarding may lead to quite sincere regret!
SteelPoint
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2014
- Posts
- 816
The classic rendition for this thought is of course the "home invasion" where hubby is obliged to witness, usually helpless to intervene, whatever happens to his wife.
Any number of variations on that theme. As has been said earlier, mere "stripping" would be tame for the genre.
A frequent suggestion here is that the thing is actually arranged by the wife, grown bored with hubby's inadequacies. Maybe she's on the point of leaving him anyway and dreams this up as a parting humiliation.
Any number of variations on that theme. As has been said earlier, mere "stripping" would be tame for the genre.
A frequent suggestion here is that the thing is actually arranged by the wife, grown bored with hubby's inadequacies. Maybe she's on the point of leaving him anyway and dreams this up as a parting humiliation.
O
OlderFitterWiser
Guest
If no one better qualified is interested, I'll give it a go.
jaF0
Watcher
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Posts
- 38,561
If you want it, I'll PM it to you. Might have to be in a couple of messages though. Maybe you can polish it and post it.
Around 6,500 words, lots of typos and grammar issues ....
Last edited:
For sure.
The mistake then would be to have her smiling all the way through the alleged "rape"... allowing hubby to entertain huge doubt as to the genuineness of the "invasion" - far more subtle for her to go along with the pretence of being violated and then to appear to enjoy it with a relish towards the end, rubbing it in hubby's face that any stranger is better than him.
CuttingEdge
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Posts
- 2,507
My apologies Jafo for my reply. I was thinking you had got rid of the story entirely. I am glad to hear that you retained it.
I will leave it up to you on whether you send it to me or not. I NEVER steal anyone's ideas or writing because I fully understand how creativity is extremely tough to pull off. I will take a look at it though, maybe rework it, and then send it back to you for your further thoughts. I am just not sure when I can get to however, as I am in the midst of a real novel now that is sucking up a lot of my free time.
In any case, I don't care about the trivial stuff like grammar and spelling however; rough drafts are full of that stuff because we are just getting ideas on paper.
As a side note to you and others on this topic though, I have always found gang-bangs enjoyable to write about, but difficult to pull off well. The writer in us wants to write multiple sex experiences, but for a reader, its about the totality of the story, and reading about multiple sex encounters can be a deplorable read. It takes a lot to get everything just right.
jaF0
Watcher
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Posts
- 38,561
Sent in 4 parts. It's very rough and needs a lot of editing, mostly like a first draft. I misspoke ... it's all first person, telling her story.
Evolves quite a bit from how it starts and may not be of interest towards the later sections.
I don't need it back, do with it what you wish.
Evolves quite a bit from how it starts and may not be of interest towards the later sections.
I don't need it back, do with it what you wish.
It's called fantasy
LiverpoolMaster
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Posts
- 545
Yes. Truly amazing how many here have to be reminded that, just like "no means no", fiction means fiction.
There seems to be a persistent belief that whatever is written must "of course" be the writer's own credo, i.e. he/she is all in favour of "it" (whatever "it" is) happening in real life, today, now, this very instant.
So juvenile - and illustrative of a complete misunderstanding of the creative/imaginative process.
CuttingEdge
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Posts
- 2,507
I disagree. Fiction can change the world. As Libba Bray once said, “There is no greater power than a story.”
A case in point, would be the China Syndrome, where one story coupled with Three Mile Island has stymied an entire industry for decades. Or the first Top Gun Novel/Movie that flooded the US Air Force with recruits for years to come, both proving the powerful impact of storytelling. Though fictional, it can certainly incite people to both good and bad actions.
That does not mean I am a proponent of censorship however! Far from it. But as a writer myself, I think we need to ask ourselves what the impact of our stories can be on others?
I have written some vile stories in the past, and written in the comfort of my home, what is the harm? They stayed on my computer and were never published or shared. In my novels, I have written about some very nefarious acts, yet, being in the industry that I often write about, I leave key information out so that people wishing to do harm to society, cannot use my novels as a means to achieve it. To dispense that information would be arrogant of me, a way for me to subtly say, “look what I know”, and hardly be responsible to divulge it in print.
So it is with stories on here.
Does the author just want to write a story about true rape? Write whatever unpublished story that you want, but if they want to publish it, it begs the question of why? Is it to garner private messages from others of secretive talk about the subject? To announce quietly the authors feelings of empowerment? Both are arrogant and nefarious.
No one here is questioning whether a story should be written or not; that is within the ethics and morals of the author. What is at question here, is what stories should be published on this site? In that the rules are clear, and Sir Hugs enforces them for the benefit of us all.
A case in point, would be the China Syndrome, where one story coupled with Three Mile Island has stymied an entire industry for decades. Or the first Top Gun Novel/Movie that flooded the US Air Force with recruits for years to come, both proving the powerful impact of storytelling. Though fictional, it can certainly incite people to both good and bad actions.
That does not mean I am a proponent of censorship however! Far from it. But as a writer myself, I think we need to ask ourselves what the impact of our stories can be on others?
I have written some vile stories in the past, and written in the comfort of my home, what is the harm? They stayed on my computer and were never published or shared. In my novels, I have written about some very nefarious acts, yet, being in the industry that I often write about, I leave key information out so that people wishing to do harm to society, cannot use my novels as a means to achieve it. To dispense that information would be arrogant of me, a way for me to subtly say, “look what I know”, and hardly be responsible to divulge it in print.
So it is with stories on here.
Does the author just want to write a story about true rape? Write whatever unpublished story that you want, but if they want to publish it, it begs the question of why? Is it to garner private messages from others of secretive talk about the subject? To announce quietly the authors feelings of empowerment? Both are arrogant and nefarious.
No one here is questioning whether a story should be written or not; that is within the ethics and morals of the author. What is at question here, is what stories should be published on this site? In that the rules are clear, and Sir Hugs enforces them for the benefit of us all.
LiverpoolMaster
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Posts
- 545
If you disagree, you would have to explain to me how a writer can possibly be responsible for all the gross misinterpretations made of his work by certain readers.
I may write in my forthcoming, Booker-prize-winning blockbuster novel about an assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
This does not mean that in the real world I condone assassination in general or assassination of Trump specifically... but that will not stop the crackpots of this world from interpreting what I set out as fiction as either or both of those things.
So, in the gospel according to Saint Cuttingedge, owing to "the impact of my stories on (lame-brained) others", I should never write about such a thing. All fiction containing anything even slightly edgy or dark should be banned/prohibited/censored, right?
As for what mods say and do, you will find that more than one of them has a distinctly shaky grasp of that the site owners actually permit.
I may write in my forthcoming, Booker-prize-winning blockbuster novel about an assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
This does not mean that in the real world I condone assassination in general or assassination of Trump specifically... but that will not stop the crackpots of this world from interpreting what I set out as fiction as either or both of those things.
So, in the gospel according to Saint Cuttingedge, owing to "the impact of my stories on (lame-brained) others", I should never write about such a thing. All fiction containing anything even slightly edgy or dark should be banned/prohibited/censored, right?
As for what mods say and do, you will find that more than one of them has a distinctly shaky grasp of that the site owners actually permit.
CuttingEdge
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Posts
- 2,507
Classic verbiage of gaslighting by taking something someone has said and giving it a twist to use their words against them.
I stated profoundly that I don’t care what anyone writes about, but some things should not be published.
As an example, I grew up on a farm, and were taught how to make high explosives to take stumps and rocks out of our fields. In my novels I often find explosives work within the plots, but when I describe things, I always leave one ingredient out. For the layman reader, they are not going to know what was left out and think what was described, will work. A more knowledgeable person on explosives might note what was left out, think, “its missing something”, but keep reading. But a reader bent on nefarious activities won’t have information from something I have read, to cause a destructive act. Can those people get information on explosives elsewhere? Sure, but they are not getting it from me. This is ethical wordsmithing…
It’s the same on here. If someone on here has a penchant for having sex with Aardvark, go for it, write all the stories you want about it, but being an illegal act, it should not be published. People want publication though, so they feel vindicated, feel normal, and so they publish stories in the hopes of generating interest, discussion, and private conversation with all the other people that like having sex with aardvarks’...
Now replace the word aardvarks with violence against women, or other illegal sexual acts and it quickly becomes clear how this site could go south quickly.
As writers, we have no idea how our “just fiction” stories might incite others to action, but if a writer feels that just might happen, and that some nefarious actions will stem from what they write, they have an obligation to keep from publishing it. That is ethics; something that might not be illegal, but still should not be done.
The owners of this site understand that, and why they have rules in place to keep people in check.
I stated profoundly that I don’t care what anyone writes about, but some things should not be published.
As an example, I grew up on a farm, and were taught how to make high explosives to take stumps and rocks out of our fields. In my novels I often find explosives work within the plots, but when I describe things, I always leave one ingredient out. For the layman reader, they are not going to know what was left out and think what was described, will work. A more knowledgeable person on explosives might note what was left out, think, “its missing something”, but keep reading. But a reader bent on nefarious activities won’t have information from something I have read, to cause a destructive act. Can those people get information on explosives elsewhere? Sure, but they are not getting it from me. This is ethical wordsmithing…
It’s the same on here. If someone on here has a penchant for having sex with Aardvark, go for it, write all the stories you want about it, but being an illegal act, it should not be published. People want publication though, so they feel vindicated, feel normal, and so they publish stories in the hopes of generating interest, discussion, and private conversation with all the other people that like having sex with aardvarks’...
Now replace the word aardvarks with violence against women, or other illegal sexual acts and it quickly becomes clear how this site could go south quickly.
As writers, we have no idea how our “just fiction” stories might incite others to action, but if a writer feels that just might happen, and that some nefarious actions will stem from what they write, they have an obligation to keep from publishing it. That is ethics; something that might not be illegal, but still should not be done.
The owners of this site understand that, and why they have rules in place to keep people in check.
Agree with Liverpool. There is no way, either legally or practically, that a work of fiction can be held up to some kind of star chamber morality court each time one is written. Nor can a writer be responsible for the way that any one individual from all those comprising his readership might react to it.
This is pure and utter lunacy and has been dismissed as such time and time again when priggish, 'family values' cliques have sought to impose their views on others.
Your take on this, CuttingEdge, would have half of the fiction ever produced banned from the bookshelves, starting with Shakespeare.
I can see nothing mentioned on the thread which would imply going beyond the site owners' rules. The issue here is whether there is a distinction between imaginative fiction and everyday reality. I personally am not going to start a lawsuit against Clint Eastwood for his use of guns in films...
This is pure and utter lunacy and has been dismissed as such time and time again when priggish, 'family values' cliques have sought to impose their views on others.
Your take on this, CuttingEdge, would have half of the fiction ever produced banned from the bookshelves, starting with Shakespeare.
I can see nothing mentioned on the thread which would imply going beyond the site owners' rules. The issue here is whether there is a distinction between imaginative fiction and everyday reality. I personally am not going to start a lawsuit against Clint Eastwood for his use of guns in films...
Make your. Book as realistic as possible with scenarios that can be used
gunhilltrain
Multi-unit control
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2018
- Posts
- 8,577
I'm not sure I understand the difference between the Mod and Rocker subcultures of '60's England. The Mods seemed to go more for motor-scooters and softer clothes, while the Rockers seemed to prefer full-sized motorcycles and leather clothes. There really were no American equivalents.
CuttingEdge
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Posts
- 2,507
That's not true. It has happened twice to me.
The first time was during a divorce when my stories ON THIS VERY SITE were brought up in court by my ex-wife as proof that I was not fit as a father to have my daughter. Luckily, I do not write incest stories so only my non-consensual sex stories were brought up. THIS SITE and my writings were specifically mentioned in the Guard Ad Leitem's report. Nothing came of it, but then I don't drink, smoke, have ever done drugs, gamble, and go to church every Sunday, so a few inappropriate stories are not going to trump my rights as a father with a background of integrity.
The fact this site has a dedicated page just for law enforcement officers is a pretty good indicator that legally questioning happens all the time for writers on this site.
But I also say, that without specific rules this site would be overwhelmed. If there was not rules against pedophilia, bestiality, and violence against women, it would be quickly known that this site was accepting of that, and the site would take on a much different look. Many of us would log off, never to return, and the owners of this site know that, and have exclusions in place for that reason. As is, they do include incest stories and at times that can kind of get creepy on here.
In what way does any of that invalidate what I said??
i.e.:
In what way was anyone influenced into imitating the stuff you wrote in your stories?
In what way was it contested that you had the legal right to pen those stories?
In what way was it proposed that you agreed with and were supporting every last thing said and done by your characters?
THAT is what we are discussing here, not the fact that your stories were adduced as evidence that you were a salacious person, a different matter completely. You are confusing issues which have nothing to do with each other. Your character was being questioned, not your right to produce the stories nor any specific thing in them.
Again, I repeat: nobody on this thread has advocated going beyond the site owners' rules. What is being questioned is the attitude that fantasy stories must of course be a political/social/ethical statement of the belief of their authors.
Can you really not understand this simple idea?
i.e.:
In what way was anyone influenced into imitating the stuff you wrote in your stories?
In what way was it contested that you had the legal right to pen those stories?
In what way was it proposed that you agreed with and were supporting every last thing said and done by your characters?
THAT is what we are discussing here, not the fact that your stories were adduced as evidence that you were a salacious person, a different matter completely. You are confusing issues which have nothing to do with each other. Your character was being questioned, not your right to produce the stories nor any specific thing in them.
Again, I repeat: nobody on this thread has advocated going beyond the site owners' rules. What is being questioned is the attitude that fantasy stories must of course be a political/social/ethical statement of the belief of their authors.
Can you really not understand this simple idea?
CuttingEdge
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Posts
- 2,507
I am not sure that you do. It is well known that a person cannot prove a negative.
I have already given you an example that you glossed over. As an example of that, if I was to write story after story of pedophilia it would be assumed that I was that I was enamored with that, and most likely get private emails from similar people who want to commiserate, discuss, and harbor thoughts of that kind of sexual thing. That is not hard to envision because writing has intrinsic influence on those that read it. Because a negative cannot be proven, it is a simple cop out for an author to say, "Oh, they are just fictional stories".
Sure, I cannot prove writing about pedophilia is going to entice someone to act inappropriately, but its not hard to see that it easily could. Considering the far-reaching consequences of that for an innocent victim... why would I want to as an author?
In one of my mainstream, non-erotic stories that is published by a legitimate publisher for a teenager or young adult to read about some fictional character of mine making a bomb in a novel I wrote, and going out and trying to make one themselves? What is the harm of just leaving out an ingredient so someone does not hurt themselves or others? I don't have too. I have the first amendment right to spell out exactly how to make a bomb, but that is ethics, being able to do something, but out of morality, refraining from doing something.
Too many people want to scream, "censorship", but really just want to bury their head in the sand when realizing their words can have power, and incite others to action. In my example, NOTHING GOOD can come from any story written about pedophilia. NOTHING. Yes it is censored on this site, and for very good reason, along with other topics. As it should be.
ElliottEden
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2014
- Posts
- 5,262
Or not do. "He/she was a cold, unfeeling emotionally distant blah blah blah..."
CurtGiles46
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2023
- Posts
- 592
I think there was movie with that plot. The 2010 film “The Truth”.
Upper class couple is taken hostage in their mansion by a vicious and mysterious intruder, a simple home invasion robbery turns into something much, much more complicated.
Most definitely a turn on. This is my fantasy.
Removing each of her clothing slowly until you can see what panties she has on then slowly pull that last piece of clothing off to the ground. He picks up her panties bringing it to his nose and inhales before stuffing it in his pocket as a token reminder of her.
She is standing naked as the stranger looks at her. Her neat pubic hairs exposed to the lustful eyes. And you are very aroused seeing her nakedness in front of another man.
Your heart is beating rapidly anticipating what he will do next.
Sure enough he pulls her to the floor and spreads her thighs wide open and proceeds to spread open her hairy pussy with his thumbs and proceeds to go down on her.
You are powerless to stop him tasting her pussy but so so turned on as she starts to moan....
