Woman Who Was Duped Into Never Needing A Man, Can't Find One

Unlike LoWat, I ain't scared of my landlord.

You probably won't be here by the end of the month, chunk.

I'm sure one of the neighborhood kids that you haven't fucked yet will show you how to upload a video, old man.

Poor luk, ever the hero who skirts the rules to call others vile names.

It's almost like you're looking in the mirror when you do it.
 
I really do not understand why you weren't aborted by your mother. Perhaps it's because she believed that you might turn out ok despite the mounting evidence during your childhood.

For which I can only say; damn, your mom was one dumb bitch.

Poor Harpy. He makes things up and then becomes upset about the dumb things he made up. And when called on it, he lashes out like a petulant toddler. 😆
 
The fact that many marriages ended in divorce doesn’t mean marriage itself has no value.
No one said it did mean that.
It simply means some marriages failed. By that logic, the existence of failed businesses would prove there’s no value in starting companies.
A better analogy would be if more people waited to start a business until they had more experience working for one and a better sense of what they needed to do. Again, that would be a good thing.
High marriage rates historically correlate with stable family formation, higher birth rates, and better outcomes for children.
That last one depends entirely on how healthy the marriage is. Also, higher birth rates aren't necessarily a good thing.
Whether one personally values those things is a separate debate, but dismissing marriage entirely because some end in divorce is a non sequitur.
Then it's a good thing no one did that!
I will note that women file for the vast majority of divorces. They do this because they know the laws are tilted in their favor and that, with little effort, they can end up with half or more of what a man has accumulated and move on to the next victim.
The laws you refer to were not only created entirely by men, they exist in the first place because that's the way men wanted it. For example, custody used to almost always go to the father. The reason why it's the other way around now is, some men wanted to make life easier for deadbeat dads. Not to mention your entire argument here is rooted in nothing but misogyny, but that's exactly what we expect of you.
In today's feminist world, it's a business model, but one that men are now defending themselves against.
Today's feminist world where the vast majority of officeholders, business owners, etc are still male? You need to get out more.
 
No one said it did mean that.

A better analogy would be if more people waited to start a business until they had more experience working for one and a better sense of what they needed to do. Again, that would be a good thing.

That last one depends entirely on how healthy the marriage is. Also, higher birth rates aren't necessarily a good thing.

Then it's a good thing no one did that!

The laws you refer to were not only created entirely by men, they exist in the first place because that's the way men wanted it. For example, custody used to almost always go to the father. The reason why it's the other way around now is, some men wanted to make life easier for deadbeat dads. Not to mention your entire argument here is rooted in nothing but misogyny, but that's exactly what we expect of you.

Today's feminist world where the vast majority of officeholders, business owners, etc are still male? You need to get out more.


Hopefully, one day you'll recognize your "logic" for the fallacy it really is.
 
Poor luk, ever the hero who skirts the rules to call others vile names.

It's almost like you're looking in the mirror when you do it.
You really should give up your alt hunting hobby. You're worse at it than you are at the law.
 
Back
Top