THROBBS
I am Fauve
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2007
- Posts
- 19,699
At the moment I am working with a project about Marcel Duchamp, particularly his 'ready-mades'.
What I like about Duchamp was not that he 'thought outside the box', but that he widened the definition of creative art to include almost everything 'within the box'.
While his contemporaries were exploring various new ways of producing art, such as fauvism and cubism, Duchamp was telling the world "Look at this. It is Art because I say it is. Art is everywhere. You just have to look."
"WOW! That's amazing, it looks just like a urinal." but he calls it a fountain.
Duchamp could draw, could paint, could produce sculpture, but his influence started when he stopped doing that and 'found' Art around him.
Duchamp was rather brilliant, as you mentioned, he could create what was considered "traditional art" (at that time), but pushed the limits, he challenged the viewer, and he could articulate this. Today, it is much more difficult to do what he has already done, but in a new way..... because he did it. That is notto say that one cannot push those boundaries. Too often "artists" do not know their art history (as you do Ogg), and as often have no "message", no "Story" to tell.

Made in 3D studio Max and rendered in Daz Studio