Yes, this happened.

[Beco]

A Manassas City teen, charged with two child pornography counts for allegedly “sexting” an explicit video to his 15-year-old girlfriend, was placed on a year’s probation Friday by a Prince William County judge, who said he would consider dismissing both counts if the teen stays trouble-free for a year.

The case attracted widespread attention because of attempts by Manassas police and Prince William prosecutors to take photos of the 17-year-old’s erect penis to compare with the video sent to his girlfriend in January. The police issued a statement Friday saying that the photos were “necessary for the prosecution to explore all legal avenues of evidence collection in order to prepare for trial.”

The female, who had sent nude photos to the male, did not testify and was not charged.

 

[RobDownSouth]

"It's different for girls"

 

[Beco]

"It's different for girls"

Thats justice for ya.....

 

[RobDownSouth]

Thats justice for ya.....

You tell 'em, LT.

 

[Queersetti]

"It's different for girls"

It's different for 15 year olds.

 

[RobDownSouth]

It's different for 15 year olds.

That's what AJ says.
:nods:

 

[Que]

It's different for 15 year olds.

Not nice. Rob's been acting much more mature, lately.

 

[Beco]

It's different for 15 year olds.

The boy was only 17....still a minor no? At that age, one can get an erection even if a bunch of cops are watching you, waiting to take a photo.....

 

[Queersetti]

The boy was only 17....still a minor no? At that age, one can get an erection even if a bunch of cops are watching you, waiting to take a photo.....

I don't know the particulars in Virginia, but in most states, there is a gradation of legal culpability by age. A 10 year old would, of course, be held to a different standard than a 17 year old, although both are minors. In many places, 16 is a cut off. Those between 16-18, while still minors, are considered to be more accountable for their actions than younger minors.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I don't know the particulars in Virginia, but in most states, there is a gradation of legal culpability by age. A 10 year old would, of course, be held to a different standard than a 17 year old, although both are minors. In many places, 16 is a cut off. Those between 16-18, while still minors, are considered to be more accountable for their actions than younger minors.

They just changed the law in Georgia, adding a "romeo and juliet" provision that turns this sort of felony into a misdemeanor when the age difference is less than 3 years.

I believe this applies to whites only, though.

 

[Beco]

They just changed the law in Georgia, adding a "romeo and juliet" provision that turns this sort of felony into a misdemeanor when the age difference is less than 3 years.

I believe this applies to whites only, though.

Thank g-d for White Privilege.....

 

[Que]

Be sort of amusing to paper Rob's neighborhood with his opinions about southerners.

 

[Queersetti]

Be sort of amusing to paper Rob's neighborhood with his opinions about southerners.

Where I live, "southerners" are people from Massachusetts.

 

[Que]

Where I live, "southerners" are people from Massachusetts.

Ayuh.

I lived in Rockland.

But long before that, I learned to talk 5 miles south of Mississippi.

I have lived everywhere, so I am now accent-less.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

The boy was only 17....still a minor no? At that age, one can get an erection even if a bunch of cops are watching you, waiting to take a photo.....

Never happened to me when the DI watched.