you heard it here first-

[Wrong Element]

The special election just the past Tuesday points out that the people here are FED UP with the Demmie bullshit. The voters rejected the "woke" Democrat female replacement for Katie Hill in favor of the Republican Latino man by a margin of 52% to 46%. In California elections, where Democrats hold a 2 to 1 advantage, that's a blowout.

As for Harris, she touts herself as 'black" but couldn't even get 1% of the black vote. Her Statewide poll numbers at the time she dropped out of the race were at 8%. That's a dismal 8% in her OWN HOME STATE.

The voters rejected Harris and her progressive policies and ideologies. Nothing has changed from then to now and in fact, from the results of the recent special election, things look to have actually gotten worse for Democrats.

I didn't say anything about the special election here, in part because I didn't see any other posts about it but also because Trump said it was going to be fraudulent so why bother. But there are a lot of problems with extrapolating from a special election in one (traditionally Republican) congressional district to a general election in a whole state where a terribly unpopular president is at the top of the ticket.

Also, I would suggest not going up to any actual black person and telling them that they're only claiming to be black.

 

[schism666]

The special election just the past Tuesday points out that the people here are FED UP with the Demmie bullshit. The voters rejected the "woke" Democrat female replacement for Katie Hill in favor of the Republican Latino man by a margin of 52% to 46%. In California elections, where Democrats hold a 2 to 1 advantage, that's a blowout.

As for Harris, she touts herself as 'black" but couldn't even get 1% of the black vote. Her Statewide poll numbers at the time she dropped out of the race were at 8%. That's a dismal 8% in her OWN HOME STATE.

The voters rejected Harris and her progressive policies and ideologies. Nothing has changed from then to now and in fact, from the results of the recent special election, things look to have actually gotten worse for Democrats.

You're comparing a local election to state and national election. Don't do that.

This is a stupid argument even for you. Ignoring context and special circumstances seems to be your specialty.

If CA goes red in 2020 I’ll leave Lit forever. If blue, you go.

I didn't say anything about the special election here, in part because I didn't see any other posts about it but also because Trump said it was going to be fraudulent so why bother. But there are a lot of problems with extrapolating from a special election in one (traditionally Republican) congressional district to a general election in a whole state where a terribly unpopular president is at the top of the ticket.

Also, I would suggest not going up to any actual black person and telling them that they're only claiming to be black.

the derpiest of derps gotta derp. derp.

 

[Wrong Element]

Warren got more votes than any woman running and in my mind is the obvious choice... I would hate to have to listen to "Pocahontas" from trump for months. Wouldn't the right wing shit their Depends if it is Hitlery.

I think Warren would be the ideal veep; I just don't know if she's the best choice for actually winning the election, and that has to come first.

I've already predicted it's going to be Harris, and as I never tire of saying here, I called Tim Kaine way back in 2015.

But I don't think people should sleep on the chances of Tammy Duckworth. She was elected to the Senate the same year as Harris; she's "Midwestern" (suburban Chicago counts) in a year where that seems to be important; and while this is not shaping up as a foreign policy election, her war injuries set up a contrast with President Bone Spurs. Also, two of the other potential negatives with her were answered by the 2008 Republican ticket: she was born overseas as the child of an American military officer (McCain), and she has a preschool-age child (Palin).