A Master's Orders: become a slut

[Marquis]

I gotta tell you OSG, your master sounds like the fucking man.

 

[YourCaptor]

This still seems very unrealistic to me.

As far as STD’s, I suppose if you accept the risk. It’s a foreign concept to me as I am very cautious about STDs. Then theirs pregnancy, which I’m not sure I even want to bring up. Unless you have been sterilized.

You’re definitely living on the edge. You should consider yourself lucky that so little has gone wrong. I know girls that would never consider doing anything like this and have end up worse.

Give me sec for the culture shock to wear off. It’s rare someone puts this look on my face.

Right now I’m just glad you are kept safe in the house and are off the streets.

 

[WM1966]

Here is the Master's demand, of a consenting sub.

"Let me re-emphasize - your supreme mission in life - in order to satisfy your desire for pleasure- is to be submissive to the male. You must never refuse a man's request for sexual favors. In all things you are to please him unless it involves risk of personal injury." ...

"Never refuse to fuck a man or men whenever and where ever he or they so desire."

I'm willing to think that a master, in a suitable established relationship, may order sex with 1 or 5 others, on certain occasions. Limited slutdom. This 'general slutdom' seems different.

Query: Can this situation be described as bdsm, in the sense(s) advocated here--SSC-- allowing for diversity of ways of enacting it. or

Is it an odd power trip by the so-called 'master' ?

or maybe just a strange sexual arrangement that's neither fish nor fowl?

Anyone uneasy with such an order?

---
Pure
=====


Note: the situation is that of a story:

http://www.literotica.com/stories/showstory.php?id=51513

But let's pretend it's real.
Of course stories describe any number of startling events; we like our murder mysteries and, most of us, don't become murderers. My impression however, is that the material in many bdsm stories, at least the 'non-extreme' ones at literotica, is acted out. For bdsm, life imitates art.

A little creepy....I could not see your Master enjoying you serving random strangers unless He was there with you (My opinion only)

 

[kinkyknickers]

Being dominated is still initially the choice of a sub or bottom, and I have to say that if my Master told me I had to fuck everything in sight, then he wouldn't be my Master.

In my reality the rule, "protect the property", is still key, and I don't see how you can be protected from diseases or even some fucktard beating you to death if you have to fuck everyone that wants you and like it was said before, if word got around then you'd be fair game for anything with a dick and a heartbeat.

I like the fact that my man is possesive of his girls. If he hand picked someone to fuck me (and whilst it hasn't happened, it has been discussed) then I would trust his judgement, he has fine taste in all things fuckable.... even if I do say so myself.

KK.

 

[YourCaptor]

You know, the concept that some people here are already owned is still new to me. I think some of my caretaker self slipped through is that last posts… my mistake.

I have thought more about your public use though, and I think I am just too conservative for this little notion. My belief simply won’t allow me to agree with it.

I think I view it as stealing. For example if I had some chips and someone asked for some, if I like them I would give them some, or even offer some. However if I put the chips down and walked away, if someone was to take some then, I would be very, very upset.

However, OSG, you are worth much more then chips, and so I think the emotions ran a bit high. It took me a little time to get away from my extreme bias on this and look at the overall concept, in the end I made it though.

Conclusion: just fuck it, so I disagree with you master on one thing, there are still so many other rules of his that I like, and some that I even admire.

In the end it goes back to my belief on multiculturalism. Nobody is multicultural, so there's no point in pretending to be comfortable with everyones customs, the nicest thing one can do is respect customs. So that’s what I will do.

 

[Sir Victor]

Interesting comments!

 

[Sir Victor]

I have always enjoyed the idea of showing her off to others or even fucking her in front of others.

But it's definitely a look but don't touch when it comes to her and other guys. That ass is all Mine.

This is basically my perspective, I might let a good friend touch from time to time but she is mine, completely!

 

[Sir Victor]

Seems it was also a theme in "The Story of O" but it was some time ago when I last read it and I could be mistaken.

I just got done reading this book for the first time. In the Story of O she had to have sex with anyone wearing a certain ring. Also while in Roissy with any one there, but not with just any person walking down the street.

Ah, yes, thanks for the clarification.

What did you think of the book? I thought it was good in the sense of simply objectifying a slave, in a look at what I can do with my slave sort of way, but I prefer more of an emotional connection. Or was he just having her trained to sell her? Didn't she choose to die in the end? There were hot passages but all in all I was not too impressed with the book as a whole.

 

[ownedsubgal]

You know, the concept that some people here are already owned is still new to me. I think some of my caretaker self slipped through is that last posts… my mistake.

I have thought more about your public use though, and I think I am just too conservative for this little notion. My belief simply won’t allow me to agree with it.

I think I view it as stealing. For example if I had some chips and someone asked for some, if I like them I would give them some, or even offer some. However if I put the chips down and walked away, if someone was to take some then, I would be very, very upset.

However, OSG, you are worth much more then chips, and so I think the emotions ran a bit high. It took me a little time to get away from my extreme bias on this and look at the overall concept, in the end I made it though.

Conclusion: just fuck it, so I disagree with you master on one thing, there are still so many other rules of his that I like, and some that I even admire.

In the end it goes back to my belief on multiculturalism. Nobody is multicultural, so there's no point in pretending to be comfortable with everyones customs, the nicest thing one can do is respect customs. So that’s what I will do.

thanks YC. and i think we have the same views on "multiculturalism."

your chip analogy was a good one, but i'm going to stretch it a little here. if my Master was eating a bag of chips (his very favorite chips, kettle cooked with sea salt), and set them down, he would be highly pissed off if someone came around and walked off with his bag of chips. however if someone just really admired and craved the chips because they were just oh so yummy looking, and took a few off the top, he'd just take that as a compliment. he'd also recognize it as something that was likely to happen when he left the chips alone in the first place. if he wasn't in a sharing mood that day, that bag of chips would never leave his hands. make sense? i tried...lol

 

[Primalex]

I know girls that would never consider doing anything like this and have end up worse.

If you re-read this often enough, you will notice that you just made the argument why osg is doing fine.

You can be all innocent and get raped and killed and you can be a slut and get raped and killed. There is no appeal court you can complain about that the off-chance of something bad shouldn't have hit you. That 1% really should mean 0%. The question is: Who lives in danger? The innocent girl who believes Earth is Carebearland? Who thinks STDs happen to other people? Or the slut who has experienced how life really can be and is aware of the possible consequences of her actions?

 

[ownedsubgal]

I gotta tell you OSG, your master sounds like the fucking man.

He is the Man, but don't dare tell him that, his head's big enough already lol.

 

[myinnerslut]

as far as the std risks, i always have condoms on me, and i'm to encourage men to use them if they are using something other than my mouth. right now swallowing is not permitted of any man outside my Master's circle of Dom friends, but in the past i have been ordered to swallow the juices of any man. Daddy and i are both tested frequently, and in the nearly 8 yrs we've been together have never tested positive for any std or infection.

i too have a question, i hope you dont mind. do you use birth control? i know you encorage the use of condoms becuase youve mentioned it but if the man insists on not using one do yu use any protection?

 

[Primalex]

i too have a question, i hope you dont mind. do you use birth control? i know you encorage the use of condoms becuase youve mentioned it but if the man insists on not using one do yu use any protection?

Hopefully not. She should procreate all day and make little subs for the next generation, so they will lead a better life than we do.

 

[YourCaptor]

thanks YC. and i think we have the same views on "multiculturalism."

your chip analogy was a good one, but i'm going to stretch it a little here. if my Master was eating a bag of chips (his very favorite chips, kettle cooked with sea salt), and set them down, he would be highly pissed off if someone came around and walked off with his bag of chips. however if someone just really admired and craved the chips because they were just oh so yummy looking, and took a few off the top, he'd just take that as a compliment. he'd also recognize it as something that was likely to happen when he left the chips alone in the first place. if he wasn't in a sharing mood that day, that bag of chips would never leave his hands. make sense? i tried...lol

It makes perfect sense logically, but if I add myself into the equation it totally fails.

I am extremely possessive, yea, I know, can't help it though.

Interestingly enough though I am not very materialistic, only care about my loved ones.

 

[YourCaptor]

If you re-read this often enough, you will notice that you just made the argument why osg is doing fine.

You can be all innocent and get raped and killed and you can be a slut and get raped and killed. There is no appeal court you can complain about that the off-chance of something bad shouldn't have hit you. That 1% really should mean 0%. The question is: Who lives in danger? The innocent girl who believes Earth is Carebearland? Who thinks STDs happen to other people? Or the slut who has experienced how life really can be and is aware of the possible consequences of her actions?

The incidents I am thinking of had nothing to do with the ladys actions.

Plus, it doesn’t matter if you avoid the puddles or splash around in them, when your face gets pushed down into water you’re still gonna drown.

You play with fire you risk getting burnt.

 

[BeachGurl2]

Thank you for answering my questions so openly, OSG. It sounds to me like both you and your Master are happy with your relationship. No matter what anyone else says to you, that's all that matters. It's not what I would choose for myself, but I respect your choices. For me, the idea of be shared makes me question my worth to the person I'm with. (Just my opinion of how it works for me, NOT intending this to be how I see your situation, OSG.) If he's willing to allow others to have whatever they want of me, then I must not be very valuable to him. And while I am an exhibitionist, I also want to belong only to one. Not be shared with many.

 

[ownedsubgal]

myinnerslut: yes i am on the pill, though there was an incident when i was 22 and rather lax about taking it regularly when i did become pregnant. of course that's something we'd never wish to happen again, so i have been vigilant about b.c. since.

YC: believe it or not my Master is very possessive as well. it's the fact that i am his, his slave, his slut, his whore, etc., that makes him want to share me in the first place. also, that chip scenario would never go down, because he would be totally ticked off if someone took some of his potato chips, and he wouldn't share any if asked either. He doesn't share food, lol.

BeachGurl: being sexually shared is not something every submissive or slave can handle well, and i've also heard others express the issue of not feeling as valuable to their Owner if they were shared. it really all depends on the perspective of the individual Owner, are they the type to want to show off and exercise a valuable piece of property, or the type to keep that valuable piece of property in a glass cage, for others to see but never touch? my Master is the type who would never share a female he was not very proud of and who he did not feel had something special that others would enjoy and appreciate. so the fact that he wishes me to be used by many is a compliment to me, even if it can be a challenge at times.

it all really goes back to the first lesson he instilled in me when i became his property, which was simply "no resistance." no resistance means that he does not want a slave who will waiver, hesitate, refuse a man in any (real life) situation. it's extremely important to him that i recognize and accept my place and purpose as a servant to all men, that i sympathize with men who are in need, that i always do my best to please them in whatever manner. an act of resistance against a man would be akin to my rejecting my submissive nature, not to mention my Master's will. so i am to bend, kneel, acquiesce. never attempt to seduce or entice or encourage, that would be just as inappropriate. but simply be there as a willing and ready vessel.

 

[BeachGurl2]

BeachGurl: being sexually shared is not something every submissive or slave can handle well, and i've also heard others express the issue of not feeling as valuable to their Owner if they were shared. it really all depends on the perspective of the individual Owner, are they the type to want to show off and exercise a valuable piece of property, or the type to keep that valuable piece of property in a glass cage, for others to see but never touch? my Master is the type who would never share a female he was not very proud of and who he did not feel had something special that others would enjoy and appreciate. so the fact that he wishes me to be used by many is a compliment to me, even if it can be a challenge at times.

it all really goes back to the first lesson he instilled in me when i became his property, which was simply "no resistance." no resistance means that he does not want a slave who will waiver, hesitate, refuse a man in any (real life) situation. it's extremely important to him that i recognize and accept my place and purpose as a servant to all men, that i sympathize with men who are in need, that i always do my best to please them in whatever manner. an act of resistance against a man would be akin to my rejecting my submissive nature, not to mention my Master's will. so i am to bend, kneel, acquiesce. never attempt to seduce or entice or encourage, that would be just as inappropriate. but simply be there as a willing and ready vessel.

And I think that's the crux of it for me. I don't consider 'no sharing' to be a limit, either hard or soft. It isn't something that I think of in terms of 'I'd never do that'. I think it would fully depend on the dynamics of the relationship, the trust, the committment, etc. At the same time, when I think of it in those terms, I always think of it as a possibility of being shared on his terms, in controlled situations, with very specific people only. I don't believe that I could ever consider the thought of being available to the whim of all men at all times. And I do understand that it isn't quite that extreme in that you are rarely on your own with it, and in many ways your Master 'controls' it. But it would still scare me on many levels.

 

[Homburg]

it all really goes back to the first lesson he instilled in me when i became his property, which was simply "no resistance." no resistance means that he does not want a slave who will waiver, hesitate, refuse a man in any (real life) situation. it's extremely important to him that i recognize and accept my place and purpose as a servant to all men, that i sympathize with men who are in need, that i always do my best to please them in whatever manner. an act of resistance against a man would be akin to my rejecting my submissive nature, not to mention my Master's will. so i am to bend, kneel, acquiesce. never attempt to seduce or entice or encourage, that would be just as inappropriate. but simply be there as a willing and ready vessel.

While this is not my thing, I can really appreciate the commitment. I can understand the logic he is applying too.

 

[YourCaptor]

YC: believe it or not my Master is very possessive as well. it's the fact that i am his, his slave, his slut, his whore, etc., that makes him want to share me in the first place. also, that chip scenario would never go down, because he would be totally ticked off if someone took some of his potato chips, and he wouldn't share any if asked either. He doesn't share food, lol.

Ha ha, your master sounds like he would fit in around here perfectly.

Too bad you folks are all the way over in DC, would love to meet you.

I've only been to DC once before, if I find myself their again I'll let you know.

 

[taniaaust1]

being sexually shared is not something every submissive or slave can handle well, and i've also heard others express the issue of not feeling as valuable to their Owner if they were shared. it really all depends on the perspective of the individual Owner, are they the type to want to show off and exercise a valuable piece of property, or the type to keep that valuable piece of property in a glass cage, for others to see but never touch?

nods, ive had Masters who to it was seen as a great honour to be shared.
It's like showing Others ones worth esp if its sharing with someone, ones own Dom highly respects.
(some Doms also get off on thier slaves having sex with others, my current Dom loves sluts!!! ... and some may allow it as it could be something to sub loves to have to do.. serving others too).

im rarely shared thou, thou it does happen at times... i personally dont really like being shared, (at times i've felt sick about it afterwards), so im glad it isnt expected of me too much.
(If wanted of me.. i do it thou. i had sex with someone only a few weeks ago as i thought it was an expectation of my Dom for me to fully serve the other. He'd told the other He could play with me and then informed me what He'd told the other. i assume cause He was pleased with the work the other was doing for Him. im like a gift to be given to others at times).

if i was asked to serve all.. umm i dont think i could handle that thou, i just wouldnt know what to do if put in that spot. im glad you can handle that SSG.

everyone in the scene is different, handle things differently with different expectations. im so glad SSG posted her post.

 

[Primalex]

You play with fire you risk getting burnt.

And the consequence is then "No barbecue and grilling any more"?

 

[YourCaptor]

And the consequence is then "No barbecue and grilling any more"?

No, but getting burnt is very painful and will leave you scarred.

Whether you are the grill master or the innocent bystander, when you catch fire its a bad thing.

 

[ataxia.girl]

it all really goes back to the first lesson he instilled in me when i became his property, which was simply "no resistance." no resistance means that he does not want a slave who will waiver, hesitate, refuse a man in any (real life) situation. it's extremely important to him that i recognize and accept my place and purpose as a servant to all men, that i sympathize with men who are in need, that i always do my best to please them in whatever manner. an act of resistance against a man would be akin to my rejecting my submissive nature, not to mention my Master's will. so i am to bend, kneel, acquiesce. never attempt to seduce or entice or encourage, that would be just as inappropriate. but simply be there as a willing and ready vessel.

i do not know why but i find this very beautiful.

i have been derided myself for being somewhat like this though the RL part of it is new and i do not have a protector really, the ones i have had more "put up" with this trait or desire i have rather than encourage. i had an online Master\Daddy who found, unlocked and nutured this little secret in me that i am now finding is not only difficult to lock back up again but that very few Dominants appreciate and want. Maybe they just want it to be their idea, i don't know. Anyway, i am working very hard at going back to very resistant so someone can have fun "training" me again because that's what they seem to want.

Its very confusing for a little girl i must say.

 

[YourCaptor]

i do not know why but i find this very beautiful.

i have been derided myself for being somewhat like this though the RL part of it is new and i do not have a protector really, the ones i have had more "put up" with this trait or desire i have rather than encourage. i had an online Master\Daddy who found, unlocked and nutured this little secret in me that i am now finding is not only difficult to lock back up again but that very few Dominants appreciate and want. Maybe they just want it to be their idea, i don't know. Anyway, i am working very hard at going back to very resistant so someone can have fun "training" me again because that's what they seem to want.

Its very confusing for a little girl i must say.

Don't believe the hype, some of us wish their was no training involved at all. Don't hide anything, show the world who you are and someone will recognize your rare beauty.