Annie's corner

[TANSTAAFL58]

Thank you.
Not sure how unique this is, but I guess not many people had orgasms while studying for their differential equations exams.

As for descriptions... It so much easier to describe the process of getting there than the result! I am not even sure if my description makes any sence for a man. It's a bit like describing shades of green to a blind - there is just no language for it. You either know or you don't.

Maybe that's the unique part: focusing on the orgasm rather than how you got there. It doesn't make complete sense, but it gives a flavour. Or a bass line. Or a brief glimpse.

Differential equations? Now that's sexy. (I couldn't solve one now to save my soul, but once upon a time...)

 

[AnnieLit]

Differential equations? Now that's sexy. (I couldn't solve one now to save my soul, but once upon a time...)

Math major, what can I say

 

[TANSTAAFL58]

Math major, what can I say

Engineer. So Calculus was invented by Issac Newton.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Thank you.
Not sure how unique this is, but I guess not many people had orgasms while studying for their differential equations exams.

 

[AnnieLit]

LOL!!

 

[Mei5ter]

Thank you.
Not sure how unique this is, but I guess not many people had orgasms while studying for their differential equations exams.

As for descriptions... It so much easier to describe the process of getting there than the result! I am not even sure if my description makes any sence for a man. It's a bit like describing shades of green to a blind - there is just no language for it. You either know or you don't.

I freely admit that I had absolutely no sexual reaction to dy by dx.

Trig equations though...

 

[AnnieLit]

I freely admit that I had absolutely no sexual reaction to dy by dx.

Trig equations though...

Different study partner?

 

[Mei5ter]

Different study partner?

We may be going off at a tangent, but isn’t mathturbation a solitary vice?

 

[AnnieLit]

We may be going off at a tangent, but isn’t mathturbation a solitary vice?

If both parts CAN be done with a partner, who is to say that combination can't...

For me the non-math part definitely was a solo thing, but then I had absolutely no idea what I was doing. It just felt good.

It was... very different time and place, where one could get married first, two years later find what an orgasm actually is, and then realise that she knew it all along, just did not associate it with sex.

 

[AnnieLit]

Jute ropes

.....

 

[AnnieLit]

Garter belts and panties

.....

 

[wrant]

Just have to be strategic about planning what your next moves are. Ease of access and keep your panties for later or have the be a loss leader for the main event. There are no easy answers, just choices.

 

[twister947]

I'm opposed to body armor.

 

[AnnieLit]

I'm opposed to body armor.

In general so am I, but once in a while it is fun to change things. I just never realized that there is more than one way to wear this particular "armor".

 

[base10]

I know that most of people that will read this never wore stockings in their lives, but I would think they did at least see a fair share of those in close proximity... So the question is: does anybody really wear garter belt OVER the panties?

When I just started wearing stockings it was not related to sex in any way, it was just the only way to wear anything nylon, as tights were available only in cotton. So it was for a family nights out - theater, Symphony hall, maybe somebody's birthday. Girls are not expected to go without bathroom breaks for 3-4 hours at a time, so I was taught that you first put on your belt, clip the stockings, and then pull on the panties. And when you need to go, you would not have to unclip anything, just pull the panties down and you are done. Somehow for the next 40 years I thought that was the ONLY way to do it.

And then today it suddenly clicked -- this is NOT the way it is shown in almost all the pictures! But how do women go from picture #1 to picture #2?? Everybody carries knifes and panties become single use items? They really take the time to undo every single clip and then put them carefully back? Not wear any panties to begin with?

Not to mention that how the hell do they go to the bathroom??? I guess nobody wears stockings on non sex related occasions anymore, so that is probably not an issue, but still, don't people go out dressed with an expectation of undressing later on? In that case they might need to wear stockings for quite a while and bathroom might become a necessity...

I just can't come up with a single even remotely practical scenario, where panties under the garter belt would make any sense.

Any thoughts?

There is a large difference between how wardrobe is put together for the sake of photography vs what’s practical for life. For the purpose of photography, I see how you would want everything to lay flat, one item not overlapping another. As for the practicalities of going to the bathroom and hopefully some lingerie aided sex later, wearing panties over the garter belt seems 100 times more practical. Who knows if I’m right here, but it makes sense to me.

 

[AnnieLit]

There is a large difference between how wardrobe is put together for the sake of photography vs what’s practical for life. For the purpose of photography, I see how you would want everything to lay flat, one item not overlapping another. As for the practicalities of going to the bathroom and hopefully some lingerie aided sex later, wearing panties over the garter belt seems 100 times more practical. Who knows if I’m right here, but it makes sense to me.

I know how photography works
What you saing would have been true if they did it mostly in porn (even there it shouldn't be 100% since there are enough not pro pictures where people just wouldn't think about it), but it is the same everywhere - every store photo is also done the same way!

I know! I need to check how they did it in old catalogs!

Yes. 1950s:

 

[base10]

I know how photography works
What you saing would have been true if they did it mostly in porn (even there it shouldn't be 100% since there are enough not pro pictures where people just wouldn't think about it), but it is the same everywhere - every store photo is also done the same way!

I know! I need to check how they did it in old catalogs!

Yes. 1950s:

Seems a deep dive regarding panties and stockings is an excellent idea

 

[AnnieLit]

Seems a deep dive regarding panties and stockings is an excellent idea

It's hilarious! Found a review article about 1950s lingerie. Somewhere closer to the end they get to more or less modern garter belts and include two pictures: one from a catalog, another one a photograph of real women. Find the difference

 

[TANSTAAFL58]

Not wear any panties to begin with.

Any thoughts?

It's hilarious! Found a review article about 1950s lingerie. Somewhere closer to the end they get to more or less modern garter belts and include two pictures: one from a catalog, another one a photograph of real women. Find the difference

You answered your own question, lol.

I studied the second pic in both posts very carefully. No further insights, I just like talking about it.

I'll let myself out...

But seriously folks, either no panties or panties over the garters is the only way this works. Maybe that's with the guy way back on page 1 isn't wearing any?

I'll remember that if I'm ever in this situation...

 

[Ginlover]

Could this have been the start of the phenomena of women going in groups to the bathroom? They needed assistance.
That or manufacturers didn’t want their garters covered in sales catalogs and people copied the photos.

 

[AnnieLit]

Could this have been the start of the phenomena of women going in groups to the bathroom? They needed assistance.
That or manufacturers didn’t want their garters covered in sales catalogs and people copied the photos.

Women going in groups is more of the "safety in the numbers" phenomena, has absolutely nothing to do with what one is wearing.

The second point is much more valid. But then I need to go even further back, since garters as we know them today started in late 50s, before that they were much bigger, more like corsets with straps. I am not sure if it was possible to wear anything on top of them...

 

[Ginlover]

The second point is much more valid. But then I need to go even further back, since garters as we know them today started in late 50s, before that they were much bigger, more like corsets with straps. I am not sure if it was possible to wear anything on top of them...

It’s like the chicken and egg. Corsets and garter straps came before panties.

https://www.napoleon.org/en/magazine/napoleonic-pleasures/womens-underwear-during-the-first-empire/

A long (long) time ago I worked in a care facility where a flamboyant French lady lived. She always wore the full style corsets with garter straps, right up until a few days before she passed away, From memory she didn’t own any panties at all.

 

[AnnieLit]

A long (long) time ago I worked in a care facility where a flamboyant French lady lived. She always wore the full style corsets with garter straps, right up until a few days before she passed away, From memory she didn’t own any panties at all.

Wow! The lady must have been one of a kind, because most women have rather weak pelvic floor muscles by that age and have to wear pads.

 

[AnnieLit]

Tease and self-control


https://cdn05.**********/uploads/photos/2018/12/181208/bdsmlr-181208-fx7YxDGcmp.jpg

Sit back, relax. Let's play a little game called "you are not allowed to cum". If you feel you are too close, let me know and I will stop for a minute, then go back to it.

Why would you want me to stop? Because if you don't, there will be a punishment... Let's see... I think, if you cum without permission, I will just continue stroking you. You always become so sensitive when you cum, but your hands are tied, there is not much you can do, if I decide not to stop, but stroke you to a second orgasm instead.

Don't worry, I will let you cum. Eventually. I am just not sure when. But you are a big boy, you can take it.

Don't you love the feel of my hand on your cock? My fingers on your balls? You are getting so hard, your balls are so heavy in my hand, so full.

Let me add a little lube. Oh, what is that? You are disappointed, that I let you go? That's OK, I will be back, just need to get lube from the other room. This will give you a chance to calm down a bit.

Here we are. Look at that! All that pre-cum dripping down! Looks like I wouldn't need any lube at all. But let's still use it, I want to try something different. How does that feel, when the palm of my hand pressing down and polishing your dark read glans?

Stop? Yes, I will stop. I will do even better than that. How about if I squeeze the very base of your cock. Just two fingers, no palm. Did this help? Can we go on? Good boy, always ready for mere.

Here we go again. And again. And again...

You are shaking... Is there something you need to tell me? Is it time for a break? No? Your begging is sweet, but it is not going to get you anywhere...

Stop that! No humping into my hand! I am driving, not you! Sit still!
Good boy, yes, just like that.

Poor baby, you are sweating all over. How does my tongue on yer nipple feel? Too much? You need me to stop?

No, I am not going to. You can come now. Yes, really. Go, baby! Give it to me! Let me suck it out of you, all to the last drop.

Thank you for this gift. Thank you for for being you, for trusting me, for giving yourself to me. Thank you, my love.

 

[TANSTAAFL58]

Great little scene. Hot AF. It was too short! I was very disappointed when I got to the end because it was over

Oh, unless that was just you being . Not fair!

Seriously: if you expanded that by about double, it would make an excellent Lit story

Thanks for sharing.