JMohegan
.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Posts
- 8,226
What we've been told is that the OP "met with them a couple of times with no play involved and then once with only vanialla play allowed. As they wanted to take it slow."I understand where you're coming from and I agree that 'abuse' is a very strong word. However, based on the evidence at hand, the 'dom' couple in question have set a hard task for the OP and then pissed on her effort and dismissed her. The timeframe is a factor but its not an excuse IMHO. It was the OP's first foray into BDSM and it was a very difficult task for her on a personal level. As dominant parties in a dynamic, they should have worked with that and accepted she was making an effort or cut her loose on good terms because she didn't reach their target within their timeframe.
Reading the OP, they abused their position of trust, capitalized on the OP's lack of BDSM experienced and caused her emotional/psychological harm as a result. That's abuse however you cut it.
I accept there are 2 sides to every story but here on the forum we can only ever work with what we're told. The OP sounded sincere to me.
The OP "was summoned to go see them this afternoon," but "was dismissed and told not to come back until I was more feminine looking."
A 30-something year old woman's feelings got hurt, by people whom she barely knew. This happens, and it sucks, but it doesn't mean that the ones who hurt her feelings committed abuse.
I understand that people here want to protect her, and feel compassion for her distress. But it seems to me that helping her to take responsibility for her own mistakes, and learn from them, is kinder in the long run than exaggerating any wrong committed by the couple who caused offense.