Anyone want to read some Fawcking stories?

I've read a few of the FAWC posts and, whilst agreeing the writing is generally good, can understand why readers are not turned on by a 13-part compendium which is something of a pot-luck supper.

By definition, Chain Stories is a somewhat introverted category. I have enjoyed many but the problem on Lit is surely what PL says. This is much more for the writers than the readers.

My feeling is that the Chain Stories category is usually followed by fans of the authors who are part of the chain, and by other authors (often AH regulars). Since the FAWC challenge has taken away the readily-available tag of telling the reader who wrote each story, we've understandably suffered from low readership as a result.

But this was just the first challenge. As more and more of them happen, I suspect the readership will grow. I hope so, at least.
 
Reposted from the FAWC thread in the AH:

The contributors to the first FAWC, and the stories they wrote, are:

alwayswantedto (The Phoenix)
BuckyDuckman (A Gloryhole Adventure -- Winner!)
D_Lynn (Exploring Exhibitionism)
johneb87 (The Manuscript)
MSTarot (My Lady)
NaokoSmith (Was It Real?)
RedMonkeyButt (Comfort Zone)
Saxon_Hart (Curse of "The Bitch")
slyc_willie (The Muses' Consortium)
sr71plt (The Dedicated Eroticist, Porn War, The Sisters Cranky and Ungeheurer)

Good job, everyone!
 
Looks up at the top of the page, two months away give or take, takes a deep breath and 'PUNTS!'


That's right folks those writers of Fawcking stories are at it again. In fact we've been giving it a good fawcking try for the last week. But... a few more readers and some good (or bad) comments would be really fawcking appreciated.

Want to read the anonymous work of some of the best the site has but not know who wrote fawcking what? Well, go to chain stories category and you will have come to the right fawcing place.

The stories are very good, the guessing is a lot of fun and the possibility of permanent damaged is fawcking minimal.

MST
 
Back
Top