~Haze~
Deviant
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Posts
- 2,598
Haze, how about re-reading the bolded and underlined portions of the chronologically-ordered posts quoted above?
While there are some indications of not-30s (or older) communicative style (e.g., "haha"), the general tenor (grammar, phrasing, spelling, construction) of her posts indicates to me an early- to mid-20s, literate person, and I think your estimation of her age and general experience are extremely judgmental and based on spurious reasoning.
Spurious reasoning? You don't know what my reasoning is because I never stated it. I just stated my conclusions. She pointing out a "mis-spelling" and something else (I don't remember what it was) as an excuse, but that doesn't mean that's what I used to draw my conclusions. I'm not a -"she said it, so it must be true" believer.
As far as her writing style..., I agree that she is very well written. I took that into consideration, but decided it's not quite convincing enough. I have two nieces, both in high school, both impressive writers, and both write better than 95% of the users on this board.
Sure, I was being a little facetious and dramatic when I said "15 year old virgin", but my point and my opinion remain unchanged.
Anyway... as far as I was concerned, after my first post, I was done with this thread and didn't plan on participating any further.
Then Syd asked a question about my meaning and I returned to clarify. I also wanted to say that I agree with her (or him). BDSM does not mean it is an unhealthy relationship. In my post "healthy relationship" meant an "age appropriate" relationship.
Now I'm not trying to convince anyone. I'm not asking other people agree with me and ignore her. Do what you like.
I just stated my opinion. I offered my advice (wait, take your time, and engage in a more 'age appropriate' relationship). Syd misunderstood the context/point of my post, asked a question about my meaning/intent and I clarified it. Simple as that.
