Can you explain how Trump can be re-elected?

[Lance_Castro]

And you voted for a loser three times.

After 21 naked selfie years of declaring unilateral victories in brief anon ad hom exchanges with men online, does demanding to see their proofs still give you a boner?

 

[UltraChad]

Pretty much

Another one who has no idea why they lost...... keep the smug all the way up sister. MAGA 2028 is counting on it.

Now get out there and shame those fukin' white people and god damn males!!!

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

A loser who beat the team you support 2 out of 3 times.

I’m not the one who initially called him a loser.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

After 21 naked selfie years of declaring unilateral victories in brief anon ad hom exchanges with men online, does demanding to see their proofs still give you a boner?

Living rent free in your head while you follow me around the board obsessing about my penis while embarrassing yourself is all the entertainment I need.

 

[Lance_Castro]

Living rent free in your head while you follow me around the board obsessing about my penis while embarrassing yourself is all the entertainment I need.

So, as I suggested, it’s about you wanting to feel attractive to homosexuals.

Makes sense.

Does your wife know?

Is it like a JFK thing, you only let them suck you?

 

[ChinoMoreno]

Funny line even if factually wrong.

Some Trump supporters merely loathed Kamala as vapid and counter-productive to the common weal.

"If wrong" but I'm not wrong.

And trump supporters didn't lose the election for Kamala. Weird take.

 

[HisArpy]

Another one who has no idea why they lost...... keep the smug all the way up sister. MAGA 2028 is counting on it.

Now get out there and shame those fukin' white people and god damn males!!!

She doesn't understand that she's in the group of those with an IQ under 100, read at a sixth grade level and is one of the racists, etc. who thought Kamala was going to win.

Because joy or something.

 

[AceDesSpades]

I am mad at you because I thought for sure she was going to win, just not like her peeps did...

 

[UltraChad]

She doesn't understand that she's in the group of those with an IQ under 100, read at a sixth grade level and is one of the racists, etc. who thought Kamala was going to win.

Because joy or something.

Can't have an army of literal race socialist unironically calling anyone who doesn't agree with them Nazis without them.

That's PROGRESS!!!

 

[AceDesSpades]

The Obamas Get Their Comeuppance

The one person who knew that the Joe Biden presidency was something other than “Obama’s third term” was Barack Obama. If Obama had any illusions about his control over events, he was rudely disabused of them on July 21, 2024. This was the Sunday on which Biden dropped out of the presidential race and endorsed Kamala Harris.

The announcements caught Obama flatfooted. Biden had not consulted with his former boss either on his decision to drop out nor on his decision to endorse Harris. At 12:46 p.m. EDT, Biden posted on X his intention to withdraw.

The endorsement of Harris, also on X, came at 1:13 p.m. The media have expressed no curiosity about the 27-minute gap. If pressure had been brought on Biden to endorse Harris, the Obamas weren’t the ones bringing it.

The Clintons are another story. At 2:10 p.m., Bill and Hillary posted a joint statement on X, declaring, “We are honored to join the President in endorsing Vice President Harris and will do whatever we can to support her.” At 2:34 p.m. Alex Soros, scion of the Soros evil empire and fiancé of Hillary intimate Huma Abedin, posted on X, “It’s time for us all to unite around Kamala Harris and beat Donald Trump.” By day’s end, just about every prominent Democrat had hopped on the Harris bandwagon.

Every prominent Democrat except the Obamas.

Jack Cashill


So much blame to go around and so much delicious intrigue...


https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/11/the_obamas_get_their_comeuppance.html

 

[Lance_Castro]

Interesting stuff.

I’m guessing Obama didnt really want Biden as his VP pick in the first place. Wonder who he really wanted?

Noteworthy Aside: Trump beat 2 girls to be President, but couldn’t beat a man.

Story of his life i guess! Ha!

 

[RobDownSouth]

AJ has been takin' an extended post-election victory lap, because his Hover-round mobility aid can go up to twenty four hours on a single charge.

 

[Rightguide]

Y

As a non-american person, I just don't get it....
And I've spoken to many European or non-american and they don't understand either.
How a man with so little respect for women or anyone different than him, not to mention his law troubles, can be re-elected?
Please explain to me in a respectful way

You've been lied to on a daily basis by the Democrat Party and its propagandists in the legacy media about Donald Trump and who he is. It's really that simple. The American majority has seen through their lies and misrepresentations.

 

[ll74]

Y

You've been lied to on a daily basis by the Democrat Party and its propagandists in the legacy media about Donald Trump and who he is. It's really that simple. The American majority has seen through their lies and misrepresentations.

*Democratic party

 

[Rightguide]

I notice that you never question the value of economic leftism as I define it.

When it has no value in a free society there isn't much to question except the awareness of its supporters.

 

[Rightguide]

*Democratic party

^^^
Married to BSG.

 

[ll74]

^^^
Married to BSG.

It's not the Republic party either.

 

[Rightguide]

Listen up nOOb;

There's more search engines than just Googly eyes out there.

Here's just one: https://resulthunter.com/

 

[ll74]

Here's just one: https://resulthunter.com/

The best way to present your perspective is with direct links for information.

But you can also just tell people to "Google it" and then complain that they didn't find what you wanted them to ....that's a good productive discussion

 

[Rightguide]

The best way to present your perspective is with direct links for information.

But you can also just tell people to "Google it" and then complain that they didn't find what you wanted them to ....that's a good productive discussion

Give me a direct link to the words of Senator Jacob M. Howard without using a search engine. He was the author of the 14th Amendment and was explaining on the Senate floor the meaning of its clause that says "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." I'll wait.

 

[icanhelp1]

Y

You've been lied to on a daily basis by the Democrat Party and its propagandists in the legacy media about Donald Trump and who he is. It's really that simple. The American majority has seen through their lies and misrepresentations.

Meka and Joe met with Trump at M-R-Lago???

 

[ll74]

Give me a direct link to the words of Senator Jacob M. Howard, Cong. Globe, 39th Congress, 1st Session, p. 2890 (1866) without using a search engine. He was the author of the 14th Amendment and was explaining on the Senate floor the meaning of its clause that says "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." I'll wait.

Are you that daft? Me providing it to you may require search engines.....but what I'm providing to you allows you to see the content that I have found instead of relying on YOU to find the same content.

The issue isn't that there are search engines that are used. The issue is that providing the content is easy and does not rely on what search engine you use. If I give you an exceprt and article and a direct link to that article, you are seeing what I am seeing and can make conclusions based on the content.

If I tell you to Google it - I'm expecting you to find the same content/perspective on the topic....which is absolutely dependent on the algorithm of the search engine.

Bottom line - provide content/information rather than telling others to find it themselves. If you don't, you don't want a discussion.

 

[Rightguide]

Meka and Joe met with Trump at M-R-Lago???

They spent eight years broadcasting their absolute hate for and lies about Donald Trump. Him allowing them into his residence is a measure of his towering character and testimony to their lack thereof.

 

[Rightguide]

Are you that daft? Me providing it to you may require search engines.....but what I'm providing to you allows you to see the content that I have found instead of relying on YOU to find the same content.

The issue isn't that there are search engines that are used. The issue is that providing the content is easy and does not rely on what search engine you use. If I give you an exceprt and article and a direct link to that article, you are seeing what I am seeing and can make conclusions based on the content.

If I tell you to Google it - I'm expecting you to find the same content/perspective on the topic....which is absolutely dependent on the algorithm of the search engine.

Bottom line - provide content/information rather than telling others to find it themselves. If you don't, you don't want a discussion.

Took me ten seconds to destroy your whole belief system when it comes to birthright citizenship:

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers. It will not include persons born in the United States who are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, such as the Indians who are members of tribes."
— Senator Jacob M. Howard, Cong. Globe, 39th Congress, 1st Session, p. 2890 (1866)

 

[ll74]

Took me ten seconds to destroy your whole belief system when it comes to birthright citizenship:

Yes, I get that you believe that.

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers. It will not include persons born in the United States who are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, such as the Indians who are members of tribes."
— Senator Jacob M. Howard, Cong. Globe, 39th Congress, 1st Session, p. 2890 (1866)

That doesn't "destroy" my perspective on the topic.

But keep trying