ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 46,383
You sniffed that he's a psychologist...that's as "specific" as you got. It's true, but not really germane to his argument, which was multi-layered: That even if it's happening, we don't know what to do about it, so the trillions proposed to remedy it may be ineffective or even worsen the problem, and that those same resources, applied elsewhere, like in child development and nutrition, might be better investments toward the same goal.
You ignored all that in favor of your usual empty snark.
It was incredibly specific...I don't care about anything he says on the topic. So the high lev or the "details"....not relevant to me. It's obvious that your echo chamber thinks it is relevant to you