Cocksucking . . . overrated?

[clark_kent]

Definitely NOT overrated!!!

I love it! Everything about it.

I crave it!
I need it!
I want it!
And, I've been told I'm quite good at it. (hence the Gold medal )

a gold medal blowjob is great!

 

[AnitaMann]

a gold medal blowjob is great!

Heh heh - So I've been told!

 

[clark_kent]

Heh heh - So I've been told!

now how do i know for sure that it is gold medal worthy?!!

 

[twister947]

It is not possible to overrate a good BJ. Sadly, the average blowjob is just.......average.

 

[mrtomthumb]

I love the enthusiasm from some of the ladies here...

I like to give more than receive in that department..

I had one woman who just blew my mind as well as my dick..she was incredible and loved to suck dick!

so I know how great it can be...

when its just mediocre I can do without it..

 

[sterculius]

My most intense orgasms have been at the end of a glorious blowjob!!! And I have even climaxed myself while I was sucking cock!!

 

[SharingofR]

I love giving oral. Makes me so wet and I certainly have gotten off during as well.

 

[GuiltyAsCharged]

OK, who else thinks all this cock sucking is over rated?

Women, how about it? I have only had one woman look me in the eye with a devilish grin and proclaim "I do love to suck dick." I got off with her hands, though. For me hand jobs are preferable. Much more stimulating and erotic, taking more time or speeding things up, it's all good.

How many just get off from the power of knowing it is what their partner craves?

Me? I can take it or leave it. I'd rather be spending time gettin all swelled up inside a tight horny thrusting vagina. Maybe because it's fat, I keep getting teeth marks.

Could be I'm bored, sitting around with nothing to do while my whore bounces up and down on the pleasure pole. Maybe I need something in my mouth?

...like my own dick. Nothing would be finer than sucking my own dick. Not that I can do it. But in my dreams there are two of me and each one knows just how to please the other.

But these girls and guys with no finesse, no artwork, no creativity; they're just wanting to get it over with. No fun. Mean it or leave it.

And these porn guys. What actors. They don't like bj's either, but is humiliating someone hot?

Why do YOU love sucking? What makes you keep searching for that perfect suck?

Fist off, stop picking up chicks at the convent.

Second, how do you know porn actors don't like blow jobs?

Thirdly, I suspect your experience is severely limited.

 

[none2_none2]

Fist off, stop picking up chicks at the convent.

Second, how do you know porn actors don't like blow jobs?

Thirdly, I suspect your experience is severely limited.

I'm sorry, but I have to agree with the original poster that blow jobs are way over rated. Being that I'm primarily gay, I've lost track years ago of the number of guys that swear blow jobs are the ultimate sex and only a man knows how to please another man. I'm guessing it could have been in the hundreds.

Male cocksuckers are a dime a dozen, and most of them suck at it (pun intended). You have the Hoovers who feel that oral sex is about turning your cock black and blue. You have the vampires who fall into two subcategories -- those that like to scrape you and those that aren't aware they are doing it. You also have the weak jaw'ed syndrome guys whose jaws tire out within 15-30 minutes of sex. You have the cheaters that think if they can just dribble their lips on your head that their calloused hands can jack you off and make up for lousy oral skills. Plus the majority of cock suckers cannot stay down on you for more than a fraction of a second before they start wheezing and gasping for air.

I'll take a clean ass any day over a mouth. An ass has no teeth. An ass has no gag reflex. An ass doesn't have lungs to fill. An ass can let you stay deep as long as you want. Plus when fucking guys you sometimes can get real proof that they are enjoying it as banging a prostate can sometimes cause them to start to pre-cum and some even experience an orgasm without touching themselves. Cock suckers can fake whether they are enjoying the encounter or not. Io suppose if I had a heart condition then maybe fucking would be to strenuous. However, I trust that I will not be in that condition until I'm ready for a nursing home. Anal sex inside a man takes a lot more trust from him and for some they are afraid for their masculinity as well as their health. So I can understand why it isn't as easy to get. I can understand how some women might prefer oral over vaginal sex to skip the whole pregnancy risk. Nevertheless, to me comparing oral to anal is like comparing Underwood Deviled Ham to steak.

 

[Fmature2play]

As far as I know mine have not been complained about.

 

[ClassyGirl]

I guess i'll be the girl to say that I don't enjoy the act of giving a blowjob that much. It pleases me knowing that i'm giving him a lot of pleasure, and that's why I do it, but that's about it. It pleases me to please him. It doesn't just please me. If you know what I mean. I can't even imagine what it must be like for a girl to love giving blowjobs so much that she can cum from them. That must be fantastic. I dunno, i've only given head to one guy, and personally the smell and taste of it all turns me off. I have to be in a very specific, naughty mood to really want to give him head. The only part I like about it is making him feel good. Maybe i'll enjoy it more with other guys! Hopefully.

According to him, though, I give great ones.

 

[GuiltyAsCharged]

I'm sorry, but I have to agree with the original poster that blow jobs are way over rated. Being that I'm primarily gay, I've lost track years ago of the number of guys that swear blow jobs are the ultimate sex and only a man knows how to please another man. I'm guessing it could have been in the hundreds.

Male cocksuckers are a dime a dozen, and most of them suck at it (pun intended). You have the Hoovers who feel that oral sex is about turning your cock black and blue. You have the vampires who fall into two subcategories -- those that like to scrape you and those that aren't aware they are doing it. You also have the weak jaw'ed syndrome guys whose jaws tire out within 15-30 minutes of sex. You have the cheaters that think if they can just dribble their lips on your head that their calloused hands can jack you off and make up for lousy oral skills. Plus the majority of cock suckers cannot stay down on you for more than a fraction of a second before they start wheezing and gasping for air.

I'll take a clean ass any day over a mouth. An ass has no teeth. An ass has no gag reflex. An ass doesn't have lungs to fill. An ass can let you stay deep as long as you want. Plus when fucking guys you sometimes can get real proof that they are enjoying it as banging a prostate can sometimes cause them to start to pre-cum and some even experience an orgasm without touching themselves. Cock suckers can fake whether they are enjoying the encounter or not. Io suppose if I had a heart condition then maybe fucking would be to strenuous. However, I trust that I will not be in that condition until I'm ready for a nursing home. Anal sex inside a man takes a lot more trust from him and for some they are afraid for their masculinity as well as their health. So I can understand why it isn't as easy to get. I can understand how some women might prefer oral over vaginal sex to skip the whole pregnancy risk. Nevertheless, to me comparing oral to anal is like comparing Underwood Deviled Ham to steak.

I never said I like blow jobs better than intercourse. I will take a hot, wet pussy over a blow job any day. However, I do love blow jobs and has some pretty spectacular ones. As far as anal, I like plugging a girls ass but Ill take pussy over the ass any day.

 

[none2_none2]

I never said I like blow jobs better than intercourse. I will take a hot, wet pussy over a blow job any day. However, I do love blow jobs and has some pretty spectacular ones. As far as anal, I like plugging a girls ass but Ill take pussy over the ass any day.

Did I ever say you preferred blow jobs? I was simply disagreeing with your comment that perhaps the original poster was either going for girls from convents or had every little experience with blow jobs.

I lost my virginity 30 years ago, and have had partners in the 100's. I, like the original poster, find blow jobs way over rated. According to many male cock suckers, blow jobs are suppose to be this wonderful thing. It is supposed to be even better from another guy based on the assumption that if you have the same equipment you know precisely what pleases you. It is a fallacy.

To be honest, I didn't get to fuck an ass for about three years after loosing my virginity because I was under another false assumption that in male to male sex, you had to be hung like a horse to fuck ass. The attitude from other guys were that big cocks glide, smaller ones poke.

During those three years, I had doubts as to whether I was gay because the sex was so unsatisfactory. I NEVER liked getting fucked. Going down on a guy was nothing I craved either. Neither mutual masturbation nor getting blown did anything for me. I guess you could say I had as much interest in playing with a penis as a lesbian would. Still I was strongly attracted to men's bodies (muscles, body hair, faces, and of course asses.) Anyway, finally about three years into sex, a very unattractive man let me fuck his ass. It was the first time that I had every enjoyed man on man sex. The tightness the warm sensations, it was like fireworks went off big time. While I won't say every anal experience I have had since then was an out-of-body experience, it is way better than oral sex has ever been.

Obviously, being primarily gay, I don't have a lot of experience with vagina's. I have nothing against them. I will say that they seemed a lot looser than a man's tight asshole. If I had been fertile, I very well might have married as the biggest plus to vaginal sex is the possibility of having kids. However, it wasn't in the cards for me. If I was single and tomorrow there was a global convention for all gay men, bisexual men, and supposed straight-but-love-cock men AND they all voted to never again get fucked, I would seriously have to consider going straight as a life limited to oral sex and mutual masturbation even with someone I find very attractive would be as boring as hell. I'd be climbing the walls every day desperately wanting to fuck.

 

[NiggerSayWhat]

Did I ever say you preferred blow jobs? I was simply disagreeing with your comment that perhaps the original poster was either going for girls from convents or had every little experience with blow jobs.

I lost my virginity 30 years ago, and have had partners in the 100's. I, like the original poster, find blow jobs way over rated. According to many male cock suckers, blow jobs are suppose to be this wonderful thing. It is supposed to be even better from another guy based on the assumption that if you have the same equipment you know precisely what pleases you. It is a fallacy.

To be honest, I didn't get to fuck an ass for about three years after loosing my virginity because I was under another false assumption that in male to male sex, you had to be hung like a horse to fuck ass. The attitude from other guys were that big cocks glide, smaller ones poke.

During those three years, I had doubts as to whether I was gay because the sex was so unsatisfactory. I NEVER liked getting fucked. Going down on a guy was nothing I craved either. Neither mutual masturbation nor getting blown did anything for me. I guess you could say I had as much interest in playing with a penis as a lesbian would. Still I was strongly attracted to men's bodies (muscles, body hair, faces, and of course asses.) Anyway, finally about three years into sex, a very unattractive man let me fuck his ass. It was the first time that I had every enjoyed man on man sex. The tightness the warm sensations, it was like fireworks went off big time. While I won't say every anal experience I have had since then was an out-of-body experience, it is way better than oral sex has ever been.

Obviously, being primarily gay, I don't have a lot of experience with vagina's. I have nothing against them. I will say that they seemed a lot looser than a man's tight asshole. If I had been fertile, I very well might have married as the biggest plus to vaginal sex is the possibility of having kids. However, it wasn't in the cards for me. If I was single and tomorrow there was a global convention for all gay men, bisexual men, and supposed straight-but-love-cock men AND they all voted to never again get fucked, I would seriously have to consider going straight as a life limited to oral sex and mutual masturbation even with someone I find very attractive would be as boring as hell. I'd be climbing the walls every day desperately wanting to fuck.

IN the 100's you say.

See that's a problem right there. Fuckers like you anonymously engaging in sex at the old glory hole or in mens bathrooms.

Anybody wants to know why AIDs plague the gay community just look at your morality.

 

[EllieB58]

deleted

 

[none2_none2]

IN the 100's you say.

See that's a problem right there. Fuckers like you anonymously engaging in sex at the old glory hole or in mens bathrooms.

Anybody wants to know why AIDs plague the gay community just look at your morality.

If you want to preach on a morality forum, perhaps you need to post at church.com. Sorry to burst your bubble, but I don't have AIDS. I also never have sex with people like you that have a higher rate of diseases.

 

[GuiltyAsCharged]

If you want to preach on a morality forum, perhaps you need to post at church.com. Sorry to burst your bubble, but I don't have AIDS. I also never have sex with people like you that have a higher rate of diseases.

As obnoxious as that poster is he is supported by reports and years ago I watched a program on HBO that touched this subject.

It talked about gay men who hang at adult bookstores and suck off guy after guy in a glory holes and the amount of STDs that he was being treated for. I think this represents only a small percentage of gay men. This report is what police use to target Adult Bookstores and force them to close off the Glory Holes for "public Health" reasons.

I personally don't care what anybody's orientation is. I formally owned two adult books stores and I never cared WTF they did in the back as long as they fed the machines and not harass customers.

 

[none2_none2]

As obnoxious as that poster is he is supported by reports and years ago I watched a program on HBO that touched this subject.

It talked about gay men who hang at adult bookstores and suck off guy after guy in a glory holes and the amount of STDs that he was being treated for. I think this represents only a small percentage of gay men. This report is what police use to target Adult Bookstores and force them to close off the Glory Holes for "public Health" reasons.

I personally don't care what anybody's orientation is. I formally owned two adult books stores and I never cared WTF they did in the back as long as they fed the machines and not harass customers.

Do you really think that gay men are the only group capable of having lots multiple partners? My dad was 100% straight when he was alive, and I lost count years ago of all the women he had sex with. I would have called them hookers, but sometimes he figure out a way to not pay up. Plenty of his buddies in the military were the same way. The only thing really limiting their partner count was the fact that female partners typically won't put out just because you are horny. Either they want to date you or they at least want money in the case of hookers. So a guy only has so much time to date or so much money to spend.

Also keep in mind that in the history of man on man sex, there is no social sanction of it. I'm not getting on the pity pot, but pointing out the obvious. While things are a bit more lax now, in general you keep such thoughts and actions out of public view. You aren't going to see some society page or wedding pages in newspapers announcing man on man relationships.You aren't just going to go up to some guy you find attractive and ask him to go out on a date.
If a guy asks a girl out and she says no, odds are he moves on. Same holds if a girl asks a guy out. On the other hand, if a guy asks another guy out, if the guy isn't gay, the guy could get physically violent.

Thus man on man sex is typically hidden and found in non-conventional avenues. I'm not on the prowl anymore as I've been in a monogamous relationship now for over 8.5 years. Unlike some gay men, I know the meaning of monogamy. Some gay men DO want special treatment based on their own stupid concept that men are incapable of being monogamous and thus two men have to be free to get sex wherever/whenever/with whomever they want. The real fact is that humans come with brains. Guys can be sluts or can be faithful. The same holds true for girls. Now the fact that heterosexuality can lead to off-spring is probably helps with settling down with straights as opposed to homosexual sex, but again how faithful one behaves is still a choice, not something you must do based on gender or sexual preference.


Note, my partner and I are not monogamous because of the fear of AIDS, but frankly I simply couldn't see how someone can tell any other human being how much they are loved, but need sex on the side. So I put my money where my mouth was. That being said, I'm not going to lie and say that the other 21.5 years I was some kind of priest waiting for that special someone. It would have been great to settle down years ago, but it wasn't in the cards. Two people have to want to settle down to make it possible. That really didn't happen until my current partner.

Case in point, I remember one f-buddy years ago that I was quite fond of. He got on my case for having other partners when in fact I was just one of many guys on his "rotation" list. I asked him why he was concerned about my activities when he himself had multiple partners. His answer was that he was "monogamous with ALL his partners and that his "partners were faithful as they were all married guys". He was a kind guy, and great in bed, but obviously stupid in regards to the English language.

 

[NiggerSayWhat]

Do you really think that gay men are the only group capable of having lots multiple partners? My dad was 100% straight when he was alive, and I lost count years ago of all the women he had sex with. I would have called them hookers, but sometimes he figure out a way to not pay up. Plenty of his buddies in the military were the same way. The only thing really limiting their partner count was the fact that female partners typically won't put out just because you are horny. Either they want to date you or they at least want money in the case of hookers. So a guy only has so much time to date or so much money to spend.

Also keep in mind that in the history of man on man sex, there is no social sanction of it. I'm not getting on the pity pot, but pointing out the obvious. While things are a bit more lax now, in general you keep such thoughts and actions out of public view. You aren't going to see some society page or wedding pages in newspapers announcing man on man relationships.You aren't just going to go up to some guy you find attractive and ask him to go out on a date.
If a guy asks a girl out and she says no, odds are he moves on. Same holds if a girl asks a guy out. On the other hand, if a guy asks another guy out, if the guy isn't gay, the guy could get physically violent.

Thus man on man sex is typically hidden and found in non-conventional avenues. I'm not on the prowl anymore as I've been in a monogamous relationship now for over 8.5 years. Unlike some gay men, I know the meaning of monogamy. Some gay men DO want special treatment based on their own stupid concept that men are incapable of being monogamous and thus two men have to be free to get sex wherever/whenever/with whomever they want. The real fact is that humans come with brains. Guys can be sluts or can be faithful. The same holds true for girls. Now the fact that heterosexuality can lead to off-spring is probably helps with settling down with straights as opposed to homosexual sex, but again how faithful one behaves is still a choice, not something you must do based on gender or sexual preference.


Note, my partner and I are not monogamous because of the fear of AIDS, but frankly I simply couldn't see how someone can tell any other human being how much they are loved, but need sex on the side. So I put my money where my mouth was. That being said, I'm not going to lie and say that the other 21.5 years I was some kind of priest waiting for that special someone. It would have been great to settle down years ago, but it wasn't in the cards. Two people have to want to settle down to make it possible. That really didn't happen until my current partner.

Case in point, I remember one f-buddy years ago that I was quite fond of. He got on my case for having other partners when in fact I was just one of many guys on his "rotation" list. I asked him why he was concerned about my activities when he himself had multiple partners. His answer was that he was "monogamous with ALL his partners and that his "partners were faithful as they were all married guys". He was a kind guy, and great in bed, but obviously stupid in regards to the English language.

Got news for you asshole the heterosexual man does not have over 100 partners regardless of what the bullshitters say on this site about themselves. If you think that is true you are sorely out of touch. Your brand of bullshit is contrary to human sexuality studies.

Studies show that the Nation average for straight men is 7 women in his lifetime. For straight women the average is 4 men. While gay men average well over 100 on the average.


"Prior to the AIDS epidemic, a 1978 study found that 75 percent of white, gay males claimed to have had more than 100 lifetime male sex partners: 15 percent claimed 100-249 sex partners; 17 percent claimed 250-499; 15 percent claimed 500- 999; and 28 percent claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners. Levels of promiscuity subsequently declined, but some observers are concerned that promiscuity is again approaching the levels of the 1970s. The medical consequence of this promiscuity is that gays have a greatly increased likelihood of contracting HIV/AIDS, syphilis and other STDs."

So in conclusion you are a postulating windbag with no sense of self respect and morals whose excessive promiscuity puts us all at risk.

 

[none2_none2]

Got news for you asshole the heterosexual man does not have over 100 partners regardless of what the bullshitters say on this site about themselves. If you think that is true you are sorely out of touch. Your brand of bullshit is contrary to human sexuality studies.

Studies show that the Nation average for straight men is 7 women in his lifetime. For straight women the average is 4 men. While gay men average well over 100 on the average.


"Prior to the AIDS epidemic, a 1978 study found that 75 percent of white, gay males claimed to have had more than 100 lifetime male sex partners: 15 percent claimed 100-249 sex partners; 17 percent claimed 250-499; 15 percent claimed 500- 999; and 28 percent claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners. Levels of promiscuity subsequently declined, but some observers are concerned that promiscuity is again approaching the levels of the 1970s. The medical consequence of this promiscuity is that gays have a greatly increased likelihood of contracting HIV/AIDS, syphilis and other STDs."

So in conclusion you are a postulating windbag with no sense of self respect and morals whose excessive promiscuity puts us all at risk.

Your ignorance is astounding and pathetic. Studies are only as good as their sample base that they have to begin with. Did you ever hear of the science and math behind sampling and statistics. Maybe you need to go to school and get an education. Just how do you think they find gay men to sample? Do you think men that engage in man on man sex are only found in certain zip codes?

You obviously know very little about the gay world except what you choose to know to reinforce your own bigoted viewpoint. At least you don't have to feel alone, there are plenty of other pea-sized brain people with big mouths that have nothing better than to than to condemn others to boost their own egos.

If you are at such high risk for getting AIDS, then maybe you need to clean up your own act so that you don't live in fear. If you fear you can get AIDS from a water fountain or dirty toilet seat, or just breathing in the same room with someone that has engaged in same sex with more partners than you have had, then perhaps you need to find a rock to crawl under and wait until they are all out of your breathing range.

In the mean time I'm sure we are all waiting for you to publish your own study on the sex lives of the average heterosexual man since you seem to have an obsession with them. I'm sure it will be a best seller.

 

[NiggerSayWhat]

Your ignorance is astounding and pathetic. Studies are only as good as their sample base that they have to begin with. Did you ever hear of the science and math behind sampling and statistics. Maybe you need to go to school and get an education. Just how do you think they find gay men to sample? Do you think men that engage in man on man sex are only found in certain zip codes?

You obviously know very little about the gay world except what you choose to know to reinforce your own bigoted viewpoint. At least you don't have to feel alone, there are plenty of other pea-sized brain people with big mouths that have nothing better than to than to condemn others to boost their own egos.

If you are at such high risk for getting AIDS, then maybe you need to clean up your own act so that you don't live in fear. If you fear you can get AIDS from a water fountain or dirty toilet seat, or just breathing in the same room with someone that has engaged in same sex with more partners than you have had, then perhaps you need to find a rock to crawl under and wait until they are all out of your breathing range.

In the mean time I'm sure we are all waiting for you to publish your own study on the sex lives of the average heterosexual man since you seem to have an obsession with them. I'm sure it will be a best seller.

My ignorance?

You may not like it and you can kick and scream and insult all you like but my statement is based from several legitimate medical studies that can be easily Googled. Your own statements of having "100's" of sexual partners support the studies. I owned two adult book stores and I am very aware of the hundreds of gay men that frequented my stores who sat in a booth blowing every guy that came in. I have no hate against gay men as I am for gay rights and gay marriage. I am only reporting data that is readily available.

Sure not all gay men are disgustingly promiscuous spending the day on their knees blowing every anonymous cock put in their face at a glory hole and that is not what the studies say.

 

[none2_none2]

My ignorance?

You may not like it and you can kick and scream and insult all you like but my statement is based from several legitimate medical studies that can be easily Googled. Your own statements of having "100's" of sexual partners support the studies. I owned two adult book stores and I am very aware of the hundreds of gay men that frequented my stores who sat in a booth blowing every guy that came in. I have no hate against gay men as I am for gay rights and gay marriage. I am only reporting data that is readily available.

Sure not all gay men are disgustingly promiscuous spending the day on their knees blowing every anonymous cock put in their face at a glory hole and that is not what the studies say.

Well isn't that special. It is like the drug pusher condemning the largest drug users who made them the most amount of their money. Of course your hands are 100% innocent of any part of this activity just like the bar tender who keeps selling drinks to an alcoholic.

You can quote all the statistics you want, but I don't consider a Google degree a replacement for real life experiences. I don't kick and scream, I simply won't let you off the hook for nonsense.
Some researchers may very well try their best to get a random sampling of gays. However, who they get are only going to be people who are willing to admit that they are gay or at least participate in man on man sexual activities. One of the most revered studies on sexuality was the Kinsley report. Now even their findings are questioned because their sampling tended to have more people with a prison past, people in the sex trade, and people who had no problems talking about taboo subjects. Thus the results could very well have been skewed. Kinsley was the most in depth study of sexuality ever done, and yet even its results were considered flawed. That says something about the reliability of research on very private topics such as sexuality.

Yes, when I was on the prowl I went places including bookstores, but I rarely put my dick through a glory hole. If you would have even bothered to read what I said before going on a rampage, you would have known that I mentioned that plenty of male cock suckers brag about how good they are at pleasing cock since they have one. How could I have had those conversations through a glory hole? Most people cannot talk through a glory hole, or if they do it is mainly "stick it through". It would take too many coins and it would be hard to hear over the sounds of the videos to carry on a dialog. During my wild years most of my encounters were in parks where one could easily have a conversation before and after sex.

You are also very naive if you think that there aren't slutty straight guys. It isn't just some high school dudes trying to sound like a stud by making stories up. First of all many of the guys getting blow jobs aren't gay, they just want to get off and a male cock sucker is fast, free, and no strings attached. My dad and all his single friends in the military fooled around as often as possible. One night he even brought home two 16 year olds. So in one night alone, he was already a third of the way to this average of seven that you want to hold as some holy grail for heterosexual conquests. My dad was stationed at Clark USAFB most of the time when I was living with him. Not too many miles away was Subic Bay for the navy. Some antibiotic-resistant strains of gonorrhea were traced back to the female sex workers in Subic Bay and their male US Navy partners.

You can throw tantrums all you want, but it shows how immature and volatile you are to go on a rage over something when you don't even know all the facts. You never even bothered to find out whether I practiced safe sex or not. You never bothered to consider that it was past behavior and not present behavior. You never bothered to consider that I do NOT have AIDS. You never bothered to consider that my activities were not totally anonymous. The worst part is your disingenuous attitude about promiscuity. If it really bothered you, you would have sent them home and not yelling about their behavior after the fact as you deposited their money in your bank account.

 

[NiggerSayWhat]

Well isn't that special. It is like the drug pusher condemning the largest drug users who made them the most amount of their money. Of course your hands are 100% innocent of any part of this activity just like the bar tender who keeps selling drinks to an alcoholic.

You can quote all the statistics you want, but I don't consider a Google degree a replacement for real life experiences. I don't kick and scream, I simply won't let you off the hook for nonsense.
Some researchers may very well try their best to get a random sampling of gays. However, who they get are only going to be people who are willing to admit that they are gay or at least participate in man on man sexual activities. One of the most revered studies on sexuality was the Kinsley report. Now even their findings are questioned because their sampling tended to have more people with a prison past, people in the sex trade, and people who had no problems talking about taboo subjects. Thus the results could very well have been skewed. Kinsley was the most in depth study of sexuality ever done, and yet even its results were considered flawed. That says something about the reliability of research on very private topics such as sexuality.

Yes, when I was on the prowl I went places including bookstores, but I rarely put my dick through a glory hole. If you would have even bothered to read what I said before going on a rampage, you would have known that I mentioned that plenty of male cock suckers brag about how good they are at pleasing cock since they have one. How could I have had those conversations through a glory hole? Most people cannot talk through a glory hole, or if they do it is mainly "stick it through". It would take too many coins and it would be hard to hear over the sounds of the videos to carry on a dialog. During my wild years most of my encounters were in parks where one could easily have a conversation before and after sex.

You are also very naive if you think that there aren't slutty straight guys. It isn't just some high school dudes trying to sound like a stud by making stories up. First of all many of the guys getting blow jobs aren't gay, they just want to get off and a male cock sucker is fast, free, and no strings attached. My dad and all his single friends in the military fooled around as often as possible. One night he even brought home two 16 year olds. So in one night alone, he was already a third of the way to this average of seven that you want to hold as some holy grail for heterosexual conquests. My dad was stationed at Clark USAFB most of the time when I was living with him. Not too many miles away was Subic Bay for the navy. Some antibiotic-resistant strains of gonorrhea were traced back to the female sex workers in Subic Bay and their male US Navy partners.

You can throw tantrums all you want, but it shows how immature and volatile you are to go on a rage over something when you don't even know all the facts. You never even bothered to find out whether I practiced safe sex or not. You never bothered to consider that it was past behavior and not present behavior. You never bothered to consider that I do NOT have AIDS. You never bothered to consider that my activities were not totally anonymous. The worst part is your disingenuous attitude about promiscuity. If it really bothered you, you would have sent them home and not yelling about their behavior after the fact as you deposited their money in your bank account.

Ya know you are taking this way to personal. This was never an attack on you till you deflected it upon yourself.

Your whole issue and rant is not what anybody has to say but the fact they don't agree with you. You must be insufferable to be around.

One report I can see my way to shrug off. When multiple reports by different studies come away with similar conclusions that tends to have more credence then your personal biased opinions.

 

[Rolando2]

I like sucking cock! Here,there,everywhere!!

 

[rosco rathbone]

I pity the man who has never been on the receiving end of a toe-curling, eyes-back-in-the-head-rolling, speaking in tongues, clutching the sheets, balls turned inside out, blowjob.

There's nothing like it in the world of sex.