Johnny Mayberry
Golden Boy
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2002
- Posts
- 6,460
niteshade said:
Wow, it is shocking to see a Dom in action, isn't it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
niteshade said:
AnelizeDarkEyes said:JM, are you giving our new folk lessons again?
*grin*
~anelize
Johnny Mayberry said:Wow, it is shocking to see a Dom in action, isn't it?
AnelizeDarkEyes said:JM, are you giving our new folk lessons again?
*grin*
~anelize
Johnny Mayberry said:Actually, I was trying to make a point: how submissive is a sub actually being if name-calling is a hard limit?
Amen!niteshade said:
Maybe it is different for other women, but for me, and a majority of the women I know, there is something particularly foul about being called a "cunt." That is the single most disrespectful word to describe a woman that I can think of. When I hear that word, or have it applied to me, it is akin to abuse. I do not know why I feel this way, or why a particular word might carry so much meaning in a certain region (I am assuming here from other's comments that the word cunt does not have such profound meanings in other areas of the country). I simply know that is how I feel.
So, do I feel that I am not being submissive by saying that I refuse to be called a cunt by a person that I have feelings for? Perhaps so, but then I would have to say that I am not being submissive by refusing to entertain the notion of putting up with physical abuse, or any other action that causes me pain.
As I understood it, a hard limit is a prohibition against an action that the sub (or Dom for that matter) feels would be repugnant or harmful for them, or an action that one feels to be totally unacceptable. Being treated as if I have no innate worth, and am worthy of no respect, is just such an action, and is, as such, a hard limit. Then again, I never claimed to get off on humiliation, and He does not require it of me. If he did, I would not be with him.
Johnny Mayberry said:Actually, I was trying to make a point: how submissive is a sub actually being if name-calling is a hard limit?
FungiUg said:Limits can be damned strange at times.
Besides, if she's submissive, then she acknowledges she has limits... otherwise she'd be a slave.
I guess name calling seems a minor point to you (and frankly, to myself), but I've spoken to another person who had name calling as a limit as well, so it's not a surprise to me now.
Johnny Mayberry said:If it is a limit, it had better be for a DAMNED good reason, not just because the sub finds it distateful. For instance, childhood verbal abuse.
Otherwise, 'suck it up, whore!'
Johnny Mayberry said:If it is a limit, it had better be for a DAMNED good reason, not just because the sub finds it distateful. For instance, childhood verbal abuse.
Otherwise, 'suck it up, whore!'
Not a bit, you bastard!Johnny Mayberry said:WHORE!!
There, I said it...anyone feeling hurt yet?
Johnny Mayberry said:WHORE!!
.
There, I said it...anyone feeling hurt yet?
Arden said:It's all about what works for your relationship, isn't it? Nothing else matters in the grand scheme of things.
Johnny, does 'being used' have to include foul language? Are you saying that submitting to one's will has to include derogatory language to make it a true D/s relationship?
I love 'being used'
I suppose I see submission as being more cerebral and sexual. It's an individual thing. It makes no sense to judge other's relationships by your own standards. We're all different.
niteshade said:nope, for 2 reasons... you aren't my S/O, and it wasnt really the word whore I objected to anyway
Johnny Mayberry said:Ok, fine!
CU ...ok, I'll stop now.
I think it's stuck on your cock!FungiUg said:Bitch! You stole my punch line...
(Now, where did I leave that custard pie?)