icanhelp1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
- Posts
- 17,200
What’s your source for all this info?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What’s your source for all this info?
The thing is Chioe, your assuming Zelensky is in "charge" he is most definitely not, Zelensky is similar to a lawyer he's just the front/bag/mouthpiece for nato. He does as he is instructed. Nothing more, nothing less.No such thing as a decapitation first strike. Russia still has nuclear capable subs and ICBM's and there's no way Biden OR Trump OR Harris would order a first strike with nukes. Iran and the Mullah's might be that crazy but even with them, I would doubt it.
And no way Zelensky would allow Ukrainian F16's to do anything like that. As for sheepdipped pilots, there'd be enough volunteers if they were allowed to go, for sure. But Jake Sullivan would be VERY unlikely to permit that. And you don't need to be in country to help with planning these days.
Has Putin de-nazified Ukraine yet?
Has he reduced or eliminated Nazis from Ukraine in any measureable amount?
Does he have an ETA on mission success of de-nazifying Ukraine?
Has he even discussed progress of his end goal, which was stated as de-nazification of Ukraine?
Answer to all the above is no.
What’s your source for all this info?
This is the other bizarre fantasy from Putin knob slobbers--who cares if Zelensky is corrupt, a puppet, what ever whatever (spoiler alert: he's not)? All that matter is that orcs are getting slaughtered, and the z-dawg is doing a tremendous job at that. Sad that so many Ukrainians are dying, but keep your eye on the ball. For generations hence, the epic realpoitik statesmanship of Biden will be studied--duping a would-be superpower into punching themselves in the head so hard and so long they fall straight into failed state status. And doing it with mothballed inventory! Utterly remarkable.The thing is Chioe, your assuming Zelensky is in "charge" he is most definitely not, Zelensky is similar to a lawyer he's just the front/bag/mouthpiece for nato. He does as he is instructed.
I stopped tracking when Lui-dupes, or whatever his his name was, stopped posting. I don’t trust any American sources, everything US sources posit usual has a political slant to it. I don’t need someone’s political opinion, just the facts.This very often
https://x.com/NOELreports
Been following his twitter feed pretty much since the war started. Quite reliable and consistent and without any fake info. He checks his sources. There's a few feeds that are good but can be a bit sensational, but Noel reports is one of the better ones.
Azov are useful too
https://x.com/Azovsouth
KhersonCat
https://x.com/bayraktar_1love
Euromaidan Press
https://x.com/EuromaidanPress
Quite a few others that are interesting but a bit more sensational sometimes and can be less reliable. If you're interested, I can drop a list here with links later when I have time. I don't use the Russian Telegram channels at all unless they are thru one of the feeds I follow - the Ru Telegram stuff is totally unreliable and really needs a much more knowledgeable assessment than I can do myself.
It's fascinating to watch at times. Back in the first year, a lot of info came from Ukrainian accounts. You could actually see when the Ukrainians were doing something because all the accounts would go dark on whatever it was - Kherson was a classic example of that where the govt asked everyone not to talk about it and overnight, zippo. They are very conscious about OpSec with good reason - release a photo and instant geolocationing, and then the artillery or missiles - you can see it right now in Kursk with a couple of the Russian reporters making that basic mistake. So there's far less immediate info available now. Take Kursk, the Ukrainian OpSec is insanely tight. It's so hard to figure out what's going on and that's good. If we can't, the Russians likely can't either.I stopped tracking when Lui-dupes, or whatever his his name was, stopped posting. I don’t trust any American sources, everything US sources posit usual has a political slant to it. I don’t need someone’s political opinion, just the facts.
Thanks for sharing that with me!
Go to the Military Summary channel on YouTube for even handed daily reports on battlefield conditions in Ukraine.It's fascinating to watch at times. Back in the first year, a lot of info came from Ukrainian accounts. You could actually see when the Ukrainians were doing something because all the accounts would go dark on whatever it was - Kherson was a classic example of that where the govt asked everyone not to talk about it and overnight, zippo. They are very conscious about OpSec with good reason - release a photo and instant geolocationing, and then the artillery or missiles - you can see it right now in Kursk with a couple of the Russian reporters making that basic mistake. So there's far less immediate info available now. Take Kursk, the Ukrainian OpSec is insanely tight. It's so hard to figure out what's going on and that's good. If we can't, the Russians likely can't either.
As for twitter, there's so much crap that flies around, I just follow the ones I trust now, some of them are more opinion than fact but as long as the label it, thats fine.
Here's a few more. These ones are pretty good but I don't take their word for it - but quite good extrapolations and some good background
Trent Telenko is pretty good. Some speculation and opinion as well as analysis
https://x.com/TrentTelenko
https://x.com/Osinttechnical
Images, video clips and snippets - good source
https://x.com/noclador
Thomas Theiner - good source of opinion and analysis
https://x.com/WarintheFuture
Australian General Mick Ryan is ALWAYS worth reading
https://x.com/JimmySecUK
Jimmy Rushton is Kyiv based - good background and analysis
https://x.com/IAPonomarenko
Illia Ponomarenko is a Ukrainian reporter and worth tracking. Not day to day stuff, but his articles are good and he's a great source for Ukrainian opinions
I can't possibly agree more, very well stated.....I have been extremely impressed with ChloeTzang. I am therefore mystified by her support for the war in Ukraine. Those of us who are old enough to remember when the Berlin wall fell are unable to understand why America's insane government is so eager to not just revive the cold war but provoke a nuclear war.
A little remembered factor is that when German reunification was pending, there was considerably consternation about Germany remaining in NATO. President Eisenhower would have resolved the issue by disbanding NATO. Eisenhower had stated that if US troops remained in Europe a decade after NATO was established, then NATO would have been a failure. President George H W Bush understood the issues extremely well. G H W Bush negotiated a peaceful resolution by assuring the Soviet Union that NATO would not expand "one inch Eastwards" beyond Germany.
Just a few years later President Clinton who had zero foreign policy or military expertise much less experience, was invoking the insane "duty to protect" doctrine as a pretext to bomb ethnic Slavs into the stoneage so that the Jihadists of Bosnia could impose Sharia law on them. This became the pretext to relentlessly expand NATO Eastward, bringing American nuclear missiles closer and closer to Moscow. Now America is supplying Zelenski, the comedian who is most famous for playing the piano with his penis, with nuclear capable, F-16 fighter bombers!
Putin is crushing this incursion into Russia as I write. When he is finished, he will have absolutely overwhelming political support to utterly destroy Ukraine. There will be no negotiated settlement. Recognizing the autonomy of the ethnic Russian, Russian speaking populations of Crimea and the Donbass will be insufficient as a concession. Russia will insist on not only controlling Ukraine but Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania, but annexing portions of Poland to regain a contiguous connection to Kalingrad.
If people on this forum had brains, they'd be digging fallout shelters.
I’ve been watching the videos, makes your eyes glaze over. It’s hard to get a sense of who’s winning and who’s losing. I’ll keep viewing, maybe they’ll show a general strategy in this assault in Russia.Go to the Military Summary channel on YouTube for even handed daily reports on battlefield conditions in Ukraine.
Troops are being moved there from offensive fronts in Ukraine. The strategy appears to be to put Russian troops into defensive mode so Ukranians can go on offense. It is shifting the dynamics, though unclear whether it's working as much as they'd like.I’ve been watching the videos, makes your eyes glaze over. It’s hard to get a sense of who’s winning and who’s losing. I’ll keep viewing, maybe they’ll show a general strategy in this assault in Russia.
It goes into boring detail but I find it provides fair balance of activity on the field for both sides. It also shows the hopelessness of the Ukrainian effort along the line of contact. His accent drives me crazy as well, but it is what it is. You'll get more truth there than you will in our media. You come to realize as well that this war is small unit warfare because large infantry and armored formations are easily seen and targeted. The map has changed little in three years.I’ve been watching the videos, makes your eyes glaze over. It’s hard to get a sense of who’s winning and who’s losing. I’ll keep viewing, maybe they’ll show a general strategy in this assault in Russia.
It seems to show the complexities of drone warfare. Ya can’t win a land battle with highly expensive armor and artillery without air superiority and stealth. I still think Ukraine is taking one hell of a risk of overstretching their logistical capabilities on a ruse.It goes into boring detail but I find it provides fair balance of activity on the field for both sides. It also shows the hopelessness of the Ukrainian effort along the line of contact. His accent drives me crazy as well, but it is what it is. You'll get more truth there than you will in our media. You come to realize as well that this war is small unit warfare because large infantry and armored formations are easily seen and targeted. The map has changed little in three years.
Interesting! I can’t even begin to understand a path forward or a battle plan. Ukraine can only win this war with total involvement by NATO forces. Russia needs to suffer from constant massive overhead bombings raids and a valid threat to Moscow itself.. The Ukrainian forces just don’t have the logistical capacity to probe, sustain and keep territory.. unlike what I was led to believe earlier, they don’t have an air force worth a shit and they don’t have the time to train them on newer stuff. How many Russian mothers have lost sons in this Putin testosterone crisis. In Iraq towns like Fallujah our military surrounded the town denying terrorist reinforcements then sent in door kickers in bloody CQC but when our troops cleaned house we owned the town, we took heavy losses even with overwhelming military superiority. This Ukraine war is like two hammers pounding each other mercilessly, where one hammer holds all the cards. IMHOI found this fascinating - something I didn't realize. Ukrainian troops moving thru Kursk Oblast, and finding the locals are actually Ukrainian and speak Ukrainian. And listen to the old lady calling out Slava Ukraini! Very moving. Hold a referendum here and these people would probably opt to be part of Ukraine. Kursk and other border regions were part of the People's Republic of Ukraine till they were stolen by the Bolsheviks in the 1921 war and after the reconquest and occupation of Ukraine. If you look at the map below, these are all ethnically Ukrainian areas, including the Kuban. These are the borders proposed in 1919, there are variations of these. But Kursk and Bilhorod are 100% Ukrainian territory. Perhaps it's time to rethink whether the Kerch bridge should be destroyed.
View attachment 2376398
Very well said.Kursk citizens claim that many Russian volunteers are switching to the Ukrainian side. They are fed up with their government not caring about people unless they're from Moscow or St. Petersburg.Some Russian soldiers were killed, some were captured, and some started fighting against Russian forces. That does NOT look good for the Kremlin's rat.
Very well said.
The battle lines are as arbitrary and nebulous as the battle lines in the American civil war. Almost all involved are ethnic Slavs. I would have been extremely content to encourage Ukraine and ALL of the former Warsaw Pact to remain neutral. I also would have had America withdraw from NATO. (This is from a former Cold Warrior who used to do nuclear targeting studies.). Finland, Sweden and Austria are prime examples of how this could work. This would have established a true NEUTRAL ZONE that would provide BOTH sides with over a thousand miles of strategic depth. (This is unlike the Star Trek neutral zone with the Romulans that appears to be just a border that can be so easily crossed as a result of a minor navigational error.).....