If you don't want Trump tainted with Project 2025, help out a little!

"Project 2025" is just the new democrat/leftist boogeyman that they invented to justify their fainting couches and demanding anyone on the Right 'prove' isn't real.

No different than the religious zealots that assert everyone believes in god and others have to prove god doesn't exist.
It's how those same religious zealots plan to take over this country, but luckily for you, you'll be safe in Canada.
 
They actually SUPPORT this evil shit, in some cases wholeheartedly. Believe it or not, there are people who WANT to live in a dictatorship, where the government owns people's bodies, minds and souls and civil rights and liberties do not exist. Just ask the incel calling himself "Chloe" above. He's obviously into it.
Then why is TRUMP running away from it?!
 
Then why is TRUMP running away from it?!
He's deluded enough to hope for more swing voters to back him in order to win, but also cognizant enough to know that he can't win without them and that they don't like the same kind of shit that many of the MAGAs like.
 
Ultimately, though, he's basically a racketeer, the head of a criminal organization, yes, a gangster, a boss of an organized crime syndicate. Yes, that's right....we should hit him with every available clause of the RICO statutes.
 
Project 2025 is the Republican Platform until the GOP takes steps to definitely, publicly, unambiguously repudiate it. Failing that, if you vote Republican in 2026 or 2028, you are voting for Project 2025.

It would help if some RWs on this board would start explaining what provisions of P2025 they reject, and why.

Project 2025. Tell us what parts you don't like. Tell us why No True Conservative would back this or that.
HEY–Zeus

It's usually Roars-Without-Masculinity who posts crap fifteen minutes before it's debunked...
 
Ultimately, though, he's basically a racketeer, the head of a criminal organization, yes, a gangster, a boss of an organized crime syndicate. Yes, that's right....we should hit him with every available clause of the RICO statutes.
A regular Hillary Clinton

Democrats loved Capone when he was handing out the goodies...
You could rely on him unlike the government.
 
They actually SUPPORT this evil shit, in some cases wholeheartedly. Believe it or not, there are people who WANT to live in a dictatorship, where the government owns people's bodies, minds and souls and civil rights and liberties do not exist. Just ask the incel calling himself "Chloe" above. He's obviously into it.
Your civil rights are protected by the bill of rights, it's boilerplate....project 2025 is obviously a psy op that was intended for you gullible libs to swallow... kinda in the fashion of "Q"....
 

Literal Neo-Nazi Leader Endorses Trump


In a long statement on Telegram, Hood described Trump as providing a small step forward to his goal of "ultimate victory," and insisted that casting a ballot for Trump provides a no-regrets way for race separatists to act - "even if it means just one less Somalian in Maine, one less Haitian in Ohio, and one more foot of wall built." He added, "It costs you nothing."

Hood writes that the neo-Nazis' long-term goals are not achievable quickly. "In the meantime though, It is our responsibility to think clearly and do whatever we can to preserve and improve what we can in these times," he writes. "Because of this, I am advocating for all Nationalists in New Hampshire, New Jersey, Maine, Virginia, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, Nevada, North Carolina, and Michigan to vote for Donald Trump."
 
Your civil rights are protected by the bill of rights, it's boilerplate....project 2025 is obviously a psy op that was intended for you gullible libs to swallow... kinda in the fashion of "Q"....
RWs did NOT invent Qanon as a psy op to troll liberals. WTF are you even talking about?
 
Last edited:
Let’s see how many people from the Heritage Foundation or contributors to the Project 2025 document will have positions in the Trump administration in January. I haven’t heard any names yet.
 
Let’s see how many people from the Heritage Foundation or contributors to the Project 2025 document will have positions in the Trump administration in January. I haven’t heard any names yet.


🙄

BabyBoobs forgets that once the architects of “Project 2025” were outed, and their connection to DonOld was becoming a political liability, they acknowledged they would have to go covert and operate from the shadows (like most puppet masters do.)

😑

👉 BabyBoobs 🤣

🇺🇸

Side note:

The proof is in the policies.

😑

👉 BabyBoobs 🤣

🇺🇸
 
🙄

BabyBoobs forgets that once the architects of “Project 2025” were outed, and their connection to DonOld was becoming a political liability, they acknowledged they would have to go covert and operate from the shadows (like most puppet masters do.)

😑

👉 BabyBoobs 🤣

🇺🇸

Side note:

The proof is in the policies.

😑

👉 BabyBoobs 🤣

🇺🇸
Ding ding! You are correct. The answer is zero. Good job Loser. 🙌
 
Well, I hope they were only blowing smoke about this bit:

Department of Education[edit]​

The people behind Project 2025 consider the Department of Education "a convenient one-stop shop for the woke education cartel…"[25]:285 Lindsey M. Burke, author of the chapter on the Department of Education, wants it to be abolished,[25]:319 and want control of education "returned" to the states.[25]:319-362 Severino wants to eliminate the federally-funded Head Start preschool program based on the false claims that it is ineffective and "fraught with scandal".[25]:482[84][25]:326

This chapter includes a section on "parental rights", which focuses on the rights of parents to cover up child abuse effectively, force transgender and queer children to present as cisgender, and prevent their children from being taught whatever the Heritage Foundation thinks critical race theory is. This section also states that "Federal lawmakers should not allow public school employees to keep secrets about a child from that child’s parents."[25]:346 How this would be accomplished is unclear.

Ultimately, Severino advocates for reducing the Department of Education to "a statistics-gathering agency that disseminates information to the states."[25]:325 This would mean no federal funding of education, and no enforcement of sex- and gender-based anti-discriminatory policies such as is currently mandated under Title IX.
Wikipedia
[25]:331[20]
 
Also this:

Department of Labor[edit]​

Jonathan Berry wrote the chapter on the Department of Labor,[25]:581-617 filling it with frequent references to Christian nationalist rhetoric (e.g., "The Judeo-Christian tradition, stretching back to Genesis, has always recognized fruitful work as integral to human dignity, as service to God, neighbor, and family.")[25]:581 Berry wants Congress to clarify Title VII of the Civil Act of 1964 such that "religious organization exemptions to make it more explicit that those employers may make employment decisions based on religion regardless of nondiscrimination laws."[25]:586 This would essentially eviscerate the act, removing the right of any person to utilize services that are open to the public.
 
And I sure hope they were only kidding about this:

Department of Energy[edit]​

See the main article on this topic: Climate change

[TR]
[TD]“”If the American people elect a conservative president, his administration will have to eradicate climate change references from absolutely everywhere.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]—Bethany Kozma, former deputy chief of staff at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in the Trump administration in a previously-secret Project 2025 training video[85][/TD]

McNamee as Federal Energy Regulations Commissioner during the Trump administration
Bernard McNamee wrote the section "Department of Energy and Related Commissions".[25]:363-416 Project 2025's plan on climate can essentially be considered as a massive "fuck you" to the Earth's biosphere and every single effort done by anyone to reduce climate change over the last 50 years, as the plan recommends increasing usage of more natural gas (such as methane), convince allied nations to use more fossil fuels, and shuttering the loans program office at the Department of Energy. They also intend to reverse the 2009 EPA finding on carbon dioxide affecting human health. McNamee was previously an advisor at several fossil fuel companies, so this shouldn't come off as exactly surprising. Pretty much making the climate worse for everyone to "own da libs."[86]
[/TR]
 
And then there's this:

Department of Commerce[edit]​


Thomas F. Gilman wrote the chapter on the Department of Commerce.[25]:663-689 Gilman advocated for the elimination of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), while claiming that AccuWeather is more reliable than those of the National Weather Service (NWS is part of NOAA).[25]:675 Gilman cited AccuWeather itself for this claim but the citation leads to an Accuweather PR release[87] The link to the full report from the PR release just redirect to the main AccuWeather website, and no archive of the full report seems to exist. Not coincidentally, Accuweather's CEO, Barry Myers, was appointed by Trump to lead the NWS in 2017 despite lacking any relevant academic qualifications.[88] Despite the claims of being most accurate, AccuWeather depends heavily on NWS data, and independent sources have reported on the inaccuracy of AccuWeather forecasts.[89][90][91]
 
Before the election, the rapist claimed that he'd never read it but didn't agree with many of the contents.

That's all you need to know really.
 
Project 2025 is the Republican Platform until the GOP takes steps to definitely, publicly, unambiguously repudiate it. Failing that, if you vote Republican in 2026 or 2028, you are voting for Project 2025.

It would help if some RWs on this board would start explaining what provisions of P2025 they reject, and why.

Project 2025. Tell us what parts you don't like. Tell us why No True Conservative would back this or that.

Why would we repudiate our own platform because commies big mad??

Doesn't make any sense.
 
Back
Top