incest

[rexfelis]

Incest

I am not saying it's right or wrong, but I was pointing out that it sounded like rationalization because many times people will rationalize things they want to do but feel guilty about.

At the least, that seems to me to be worth thinking about in and of itself. Whenever I find myself rationalizing something, I stop and take a look at it.

 

[Guest]

Just a thought...

If there are indeed any women interested ( any age is ok) in having a family LOVE relationship, maybe we can work something out? If you like it as much as i do and would like to make it HAPPEN, email me, lets get the LOVE back in the Family.

Maybe you should try the personals?

 

[Guest]

I fooled around with my cousin almost daily for about 4 years, from the time we were around 12 to 16. We were curious about sex, but neither one of us had any boyfriends, so we would play with each other.. usually one of us would play the role of a male, and use our finger(s) as a dick. We're both in our 30's now, married, and since we stopped we've only had a few chances to re-create that fun.

 

[Laci]

I have had some innocent fun when I was younger with an older cousin of mine but as far as it went the only way I could be help accountable id if my sisters brother in law counts.

 

[Guest]

One time my sister came home from the gym, she was wearing very short spandex shorts and a sports bra. I was watching TV in my sweats with no underwear. She came over and sat on my lap and started chatting. I got excited and got an erection which she noticed. She giggled and said "need help with something?" I apologized, but she replied "Don't worry about, I'll fix it." She started to dry hump me right there, moving her but around on my crotch (over my pants of course.) She then said, YOu are really excited!" As she was gyrating on me she told me I can touch her breasts. This made me real nervous so I grabbed her breasts over her sports bra. She then took y hand and put them under it, and took her bra off. Man were her breasts oh so soft She started dry humping me in a good rhythm and told me to tellher when I was gonna cum, which didnt take too long, about 3 minutes into it I came shot my load inside my sweatpants. It was really intense. Is that incest at all? I don't think so because our genitals never touched.

 

[rexfelis]

Sounds like incest to me... sexual contact between blood relatives.

Or at least incestuous intent.

 

[Guest]

once and for all

i looked up the word incest, and it says its "sexual intercourse between 2 people so closely related that its illegal to marry" so anything else isn't

 

[rexfelis]

Re: once and for all

i looked up the word incest, and it says its "sexual intercourse between 2 people so closely related that its illegal to marry" so anything else isn't

Did you look up the word "intercourse"? Because there was sexual intercourse between the two, even if it wasn't standard sexual intercourse.

 

[Guest]

Re: Re: once and for all

Did you look up the word "intercourse"? Because there was sexual intercourse between the two, even if it wasn't standard sexual intercourse.

Sorry, but no. In order for it to be intercourse it MUST include penetration. There was nothing close to penetration.

 

[rexfelis]

Re: Re: Re: once and for all

Sorry, but no. In order for it to be intercourse it MUST include penetration. There was nothing close to penetration.

Well we can tell that YOU are a typical man. LOL!!!

According to your definition, Bill Clinton did not have sexual relations with that woman! LOL

Webster's Unabridged Dictionary defines "Intercourse" in the sexual sense thusly:

"The sexual joining of two individuals; coitus; copulation."

Now, granted, there was not coitus or copulation, since there was no flesh-on-flesh contact. However, there *was* a sexual joining of two individuals.

And now it ocurrs to me to wonder why in hell I am arguing this, since I could care less...

 

[Young Knave]

Re: Re: Re: Re: once and for all

Well we can tell that YOU are a typical man. LOL!!!

According to your definition, Bill Clinton did not have sexual relations with that woman! LOL

Webster's Unabridged Dictionary defines "Intercourse" in the sexual sense thusly:

"The sexual joining of two individuals; coitus; copulation."

Now, granted, there was not coitus or copulation, since there was no flesh-on-flesh contact. However, there *was* a sexual joining of two individuals.

And now it ocurrs to me to wonder why in hell I am arguing this, since I could care less...

I've got to go with unregistered on this one. According to your definition, making out would qualify as "intercourse". Which is pretty much what this dude did with his sister.

Intercourse is a specific term refering to a particular sexual act. I think that's pretty clear from the definition you yourself gave. It's obvious what the writer meant by "sexual joining" there. Notice how the terms coitus, copulation followed it, just in case it wasn't clear enough?

 

[petrel]

Children play games.

Adults know better.

i agree; kids will play around its naturall exploration; adults shoudl realise that there are alot of issues aorund incest
1 potential for pregnancy and recessive genes
2 potential damage emotionally etc to either party
3 potential for abuse

none of the above have to happen and as i believe i said on an earlier thread on this topic incest is a good part society enforced morality. if you choose as two adults to get into a relationship and you happen to be blood related then its up to you to decide how much risk there is of any of the above
If you are fantasising - please go ahead i mean its hardly as if its an unknown fantasy!!

 

[rexfelis]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: once and for all

I've got to go with unregistered on this one. According to your definition, making out would qualify as "intercourse". Which is pretty much what this dude did with his sister.

Intercourse is a specific term refering to a particular sexual act. I think that's pretty clear from the definition you yourself gave. It's obvious what the writer meant by "sexual joining" there. Notice how the terms coitus, copulation followed it, just in case it wasn't clear enough?

That is primarily why I stated that I did not know why I was arguing this topic...

 

[Young Knave]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: once and for all

I'm agreeing with unregistered here, actually. Intercourse has always specifically meant penetration (ie coitus, copulation). It does not include copping a feel, or rubbing up against each other with clothes on, or making out.

According to your interpretation of the definition, these things would qualify as intercourse. I've never heard the word used in such a way however.

That is primarily why I stated that I did not know why I was arguing this topic...

 

[rexfelis]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: once and for all

I'm agreeing with unregistered here, actually. Intercourse has always specifically meant penetration (ie coitus, copulation). It does not include copping a feel, or rubbing up against each other with clothes on, or making out.

According to your interpretation of the definition, these things would qualify as intercourse. I've never heard the word used in such a way however.

Not that it's on topic, but "intercourse" did not aquire a sexual; connotation until around the middle ages, if I recall correctly. Before that, it meant conversation. It still caries this definition, though it is mostly knows by it's sexual meaning.

 

[Robert Felle]

Actually, the source I'm using, the American Heritage Dictionary, only says "Sexual RELATIONS between persons who are so closely related that their marriage is illegal or forbidden by custom."

Besides which, even if it specifically refers to coitus, I would consider that "in the spirit of the law," any truly carnal interaction between close relations could be considered a degree of incest. I dunno where that rubric would start, but it would definitely include feeling of the breasts, if not dry-humping as well.

 

[Robert Felle]

Although I should point out, my "spirit of the law" argument is stronger on a conception of incest as being taboo because it messes w/ family roles, rather than because over generations it can cause birth defects.

 

[Guest]

I am a mom who fell in love with my son and have a beautiful healthy daughter by him. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it or her. I want to do it again and again.

 

[rexfelis]

Keep in mind, I did not define incest as bad, I just said that what they did would be incestuous.

 

[Robert Felle]

I should point out that although I am not recognizing a universal standard of incest as being bad; but it does not change the fact that incest is defined specifically by what a given society finds unacceptable.

I am a mom who fell in love with my son and have a beautiful healthy daughter by him. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it or her. I want to do it again and again.

It's beautiful that you have a healthy daughter to love, ma'am, and if you and your son are both happy then more power to you.

 

[dallas45daddy]

Incest

While I have never indulged in incest, the act of it certainly turns me on...esp f/d and m/s incest stories. I think just having the fantasy of something that taboo is the reason for my turn-on.

Though it might be fun to "adopt" a family (not necessarily real family) to roleplay for fun... as long as everyone is of legal age and concenting. Anyone ever done that?

If any Dallas ladies are interested, feel free to email me at dallas45daddy@yahoo.com.

 

[mongo]

Their are a lot of things ,I dont know but what I do know if the best things in life dont make sence

 

[Guest]

Their are a lot of things ,I dont know but what I do know if the best things in life dont make sence

 

[Guest]

My lesbian daughter is a massage therapist. While giving me a massage last week, her hand brushed against my clit twice. I'm sure I saw her sile when she noticed my nipples get hard. Does this mean she is interested in going further with me? I'm interested in exploring this further. How would I go about asking her.

 

[Guest]

Uh huh, sure.