Rybka
Nit pick; pearl too!
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2002
- Posts
- 2,449
All things being equal, I prefer rhymed and metered verse, but normally things are not equal. It is harder to write good original rhyming poetry for two basic reasons.
1. Rhyme/metre requires structure and is thus more restrictive in what and how something can be said.
2. Since rhymed verse is restrictive, its smaller universe of options has been more fully used already. Thus novel/creative and non trite/cliché options are far smaller than the choices available for free verse.
Contrary to Bogusbrig's assertion:
Just my opinion
1. Rhyme/metre requires structure and is thus more restrictive in what and how something can be said.
2. Since rhymed verse is restrictive, its smaller universe of options has been more fully used already. Thus novel/creative and non trite/cliché options are far smaller than the choices available for free verse.
Contrary to Bogusbrig's assertion:
I tend to feel that artists/poets who reject traditional 'forms' (e.g. rhyme and metre) do so from 'lack of creative ability' and the inability to find something new to say or paint in a traditional way.bogusbrig said:. . .
Though to use an analogy. Traditional structured verse is like academic painting and one of the reasons artists rebeled against it was because they found it curtailed their creativity with arbitary rules that had no solid foundation. You now find that painters with good technical skill and no creativity still paint in an academic way while the really interesting painters have to tackle the white elephant of creative freedom and anything goes. Psychologically it's far more difficult.
And so is free verse!
. . .
Stick to tradition and be boring. I'm not saying there isn't a place for it now and again but it is only one option now. Thankfully.
Just my opinion