Angeline
Poet Chick
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
- Posts
- 27,173
Tzara said:Well, I probably could translate this, but I don't think I'm gawaine to try.
it's your chauce.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tzara said:Well, I probably could translate this, but I don't think I'm gawaine to try.
Angeline said:it's your chauce.
BooMerengue said:Her teeth hung over her lips
cheeks wide as womens hips
a lute she bore upon her back
her neck long and not great (lol)
her hair in a cluttered heap
she was broad in the shoulders
with breasts hanging like a whores
T'was shaped like a barrell
and to tell the foulness of the Lady
there is no tongue would tell it right
she sat on a horse who had seen better days
the gold and jewels she wore
were an unfitting sight
She was so foul a creature
Is that close? Doesn't matter- I had fun!
twelveoone said:Wow, you speake.....
BooMerengue said:Hey Ange!! *waves
Never read ol Chaucer- some say I should but ugh...
Hows you?
Angeline said:Not bad. How are you?
I'm hanging around being a football widow.
I have the prologue to the Canterbury Tales memorized in middle English thanks to my senior English teacher, Mr. Alito, uncle of the Supreme Court nominee. Small world, huh? I even saw an article about him (Samuel Alito) that quoted my high school Latin teacher who I thought was surely dead by now.
BTW, I shared this info with Tath, who I also told months ago that I knew this guy in Conan O'Brian's band because he dated one of my college roomates. Tath said "What are you like Forrest Gump?"
You should read The Miller's Tale. It's very funny.
From The Wedding of Sir Gawain and Dame RagnelleBooMerengue said:Nah, baby. I just read. If I could spell that badly I'd write you something bawdy!
Or perhaps some free verse poets are incapable of working within structure. Or don't have the ability or fortitude to try. Can you envision a rocket scientist stating that the laws of physics are too restrictive? Or an engineer deciding to ignore the laws of quantum mechanics when designing a bridge? Or a dietician unilaterally deciding that calories don't count? Or a senator ignoring a PAC? Give me a break.wildsweetone said:some free verse poets find rhyme to be too restricting, some simply aren't interested in form poetry.
.
Trolly said:Or perhaps some free verse poets are incapable of working within structure. ...
Trolly said:Or perhaps some free verse poets are incapable of working within structure. Or don't have the ability or fortitude to try. Can you envision a rocket scientist stating that the laws of physics are too restrictive? Or an engineer deciding to ignore the laws of quantum mechanics when designing a bridge? Or a dietician unilaterally deciding that calories don't count? Or a senator ignoring a PAC? Give me a break.
Trolly said:Or perhaps some free verse poets are incapable of working within structure. Or don't have the ability or fortitude to try. Can you envision a rocket scientist stating that the laws of physics are too restrictive? Or an engineer deciding to ignore the laws of quantum mechanics when designing a bridge? Or a dietician unilaterally deciding that calories don't count? Or a senator ignoring a PAC? Give me a break.
annaswirls said:um yes, you are confused
"rocket scientists" did have to state that the traditional Newtonian laws of physics were too restrictive as they do not hold up and well, sorry but quantum mechanics can pretty much be ignored in designing a bridge.
Actually the analogies are pretty bad here Trolly. BUT I love the idea of form being like Newtonian Physics and Free Verse falling into the realm of quantum mechanics. That I can get a feel for.
Trolly said:Holy Mackrel. Some free-form poets with intellect. My bad. Underestimated. Hmm. What else might I be wrong about? . . .
AH . . . Anna, reality may lie in the realm of string theory and quantum mechanics, but most of us still dwell in the world of Newtonian mechanics and even a pre-Copernican universe. For example, do you still talk of a 'sunset'? It doesn't you know, rather the earth revolves and thus the horizon comes up and over takes it.annaswirls said:um yes, you are confused
"rocket scientists" did have to state that the traditional Newtonian laws of physics were too restrictive as they do not hold up and well, sorry but quantum mechanics can pretty much be ignored in designing a bridge.
Actually the analogies are pretty bad here Trolly. BUT I love the idea of form being like Newtonian Physics and Free Verse falling into the realm of quantum mechanics. That I can get a feel for.
"Sunset" is actually a concept that is Einsteinian. All motion is relative. It is perfectly consistent to posit that we are still and the motion we perceive (sun, moon, planets, the solar system drifting through space) are around us. Just changes how you calculate things a bit.Rybka said:AH . . . Anna, reality may lie in the realm of string theory and quantum mechanics, but most of us still dwell in the world of Newtonian mechanics and even a pre-Copernican universe. For example, do you still talk of a 'sunset'? It doesn't you know, rather the earth revolves and thus the horizon comes up and over takes it.
Well... that perhaps Mackrel ain't holy.Trolly said:Holy Mackrel. Some free-form poets with intellect. My bad. Underestimated. Hmm. What else might I be wrong about? . . .
If that were true than why did we change our scientific view and our way of calculating things? Perhaps Occam's razor slashed again . . . and maybe society could use a shave?Tzara said:"Sunset" is actually a concept that is Einsteinian. All motion is relative. It is perfectly consistent to posit that we are still and the motion we perceive (sun, moon, planets, the solar system drifting through space) are around us. Just changes how you calculate things a bit.
Society always needs a shave. It's beard grows in fast and gray.Rybka said:If that were true than why did we change our scientific view and our way of calculating things? Perhaps Occam's razor slashed again . . . and maybe society could use a shave?
Perhaps some are.Trolly said:Or perhaps some free verse poets are incapable of working within structure. Or don't have the ability or fortitude to try.
Rybka said:AH . . . Anna, reality may lie in the realm of string theory and quantum mechanics, but most of us still dwell in the world of Newtonian mechanics and even a pre-Copernican universe. For example, do you still talk of a 'sunset'? It doesn't you know, rather the earth revolves and thus the horizon comes up and over takes it.
As I once wrote in a poem titled Sundowner . . .
"Have not you ever seen
the sea turn red wine plum
and all the splashing colors run
when with a flash of green
the spinning earth does come
and swallows up the liquid sun."
annaswirls said:To write free verse well, you must have more descipline than in form.
A classroom of 8th graders without a teacher, without formal rule-- think of the discipline needed to continue to work and learn.
An accapella singer without the assistance of instruments to help her stay on key, on track.
The abstract painter attempting to convey an image by its presence and not the shape that everyone else can see, measure, trace with fingers.
I agree often times free verse is an easy way out, but as 1201 said, there is form to free verse, and to quote a redwhiteandblue blooded countrywestern chap I do not know beyond the bumperstickers of the good ol' boys in town
"Free Verse isn't Free"
oh my, if I have bumper stickers made up, any y'all gonna order one?
I am copyrighting it here, so don't go tryin' to steal it.
Trolly said:Holy Mackrel. Some free-form poets with intellect. My bad. Underestimated. Hmm. What else might I be wrong about? . . .
Angeline said:Writing good poetry takes discipline. Names like "form" and "free verse" are arbitrary. We both love Wallace Stevens' blackbird poem, right? If that were a form, 'number poetry," would it be any less good? No. Good writing is just good, no matter what name or classification you assign to it.
Just trolling.wildsweetone said:Ishmael, i did a double take when i read your post. sorry, but are you joking or serious?