KC has been thinking too much again

sunfox said:


Not to put too fine a point upon it, but if someone lays a hand on my child sexually until she's old enough to deal with it herself, I'll be in jail for a very long time when I'm done with them... and there won't be enough left of the perpetrator to fill a Hefty bag.

See, with me there wouldn't be much of a question of jailtime. I would probably trigger extremely hard, lose all sense of reality and tear the guy apart.

I hate rapists too, real ones. If I ever got into prison I'd probably start killing people and never get out. But rape fantasy/roleplay turns me on. I guess I'm a sick perverted fuck.
 
ownedsubgal said:
just wanted to say, there is a difference between a pedophile and a child molester. one does not necessarily equate to the other.

Just had to point this out for reiteration.


Also, the research shows that true pedophiles --- those who are exlusively sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children --- are not able to be "cured". They know it is wrong to sexually desire children and they can modify their behavior through counseling programs and medication but they cannot eliminate the desire to have sex with children or change it into a desire to have sex with adults.

-B
 
You were raped by women?

I think there was a thread on this, I'll have to dig it up, because that makes no sense to me.
 
I think the consent issue works poorly with animals. Most of the beastiality material I've stumbled upon has the homosapien receiving.
 
Besides, we treat animals as commodities in every other way. The reason we dont fuck them is so we don't disrespect ourselves, not them.
 
I tend to agree. There are plenty of people who abuse their animals who would never consider having sex with them and it has nothing to do with concern for the animal.

Unless you tie them down or drug them or something there comes a point when a dog WILL bite you if it's displeased. It's the whole you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink, thing. Your dog doesn't think he's been misused because he got to chew your dirty underwear.

It's grody, but is it morally repellant? Depends on the act and the distress of the animal. I wouldn't personally engage in any such acts with my pet but that's because it creeps me out not because I automatically assume that a dog would end up in therapy because it got to do something that dogs are generally inclined to do which is lick smelly stuff.




-B
 
bridgeburner said:
I tend to agree. There are plenty of people who abuse their animals who would never consider having sex with them and it has nothing to do with concern for the animal.

Unless you tie them down or drug them or something there comes a point when a dog WILL bite you if it's displeased. It's the whole you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink, thing. Your dog doesn't think he's been misused because he got to chew your dirty underwear.

It's grody, but is it morally repellant? Depends on the act and the distress of the animal. I wouldn't personally engage in any such acts with my pet but that's because it creeps me out not because I automatically assume that a dog would end up in therapy because it got to do something that dogs are generally inclined to do which is lick smelly stuff.




-B
lets gross ya out some more. ppl train dogs from puppies to do stuff and not to scratch etc. while doing it. i see having any sexual relations with an animal as wrong because that animal functions on instinct, they dont really think about what they are doing. so to me its wrong to misuse an animal that way.


BTW thanks for making this a very interesting thread everyone. :)
 
graceanne said,

//BDSM does not equal perversion. Just cause someone's into BDSM does not make them a child abuser and life destroyer. //

Somehow I thought SM was perversion, as much as liking to lick boots. The pervert though--perhaps you mean this-- is not necessarily a pervert-criminal (law breaker), depending on her choice of partners, venue, consequences, etc.
 
Pure said:
graceanne said,

//BDSM does not equal perversion. Just cause someone's into BDSM does not make them a child abuser and life destroyer. //

Somehow I thought SM was perversion, as much as liking to lick boots. The pervert though--perhaps you mean this-- is not necessarily a pervert-criminal (law breaker), depending on her choice of partners, venue, consequences, etc.

I think probably pervert is one of those words that mean different things to different people. I have a friend who thinks giving blow jobs is perverted. Frankly, I'm sure you could find someone who thinks anything but the missionary position is perverted.
 
graceanne said:
I think probably pervert is one of those words that mean different things to different people. I have a friend who thinks giving blow jobs is perverted. Frankly, I'm sure you could find someone who thinks anything but the missionary position is perverted.
i proudly tell my friends and family that i'm a pervert. pervert is a term of affection i use to people i like and respect :D

sicko is an insult :mad:
xx
 
dolf said:
i proudly tell my friends and family that i'm a pervert. pervert is a term of affection i use to people i like and respect :D

sicko is an insult :mad:
xx

Perv!
 
Back
Top