Straight-8
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2005
- Posts
- 397
Metric is easier to work with because it uses multiples of 10. You mention feet and inches. Before metrification some/most/all (?) survey work in Canada was done in feet and tenths of feet. Way to confuse the troops!Scalywag said:.I use metric quite often and found it much easier to use once I gathered a sense of the spatial aspects. I remember the first all metric project I worked on had column spacing of 9000 mm and I thought the building was some sort of monstrosity, until I realized that was only around 30ft.
I don't know how much publicity it got in the US but when Canada converted to metric we had a major screw up that ought to have ended tragically but squeeked by through the 'dumb luck' exemption. A large jet (747 if memory serves me) was flying from Montreal to Vancouver. It fueled in Montreal (where you'd think they had some familiarity with metric). They put 'X' litres instead of 'X' gallons. A litre is about the volume of a quart. While merrily flying along about 10,000 metres (~30,000 feet) over Manitoba they ran out of gas (doesn't it just spoil your day when that happens!). Don't ask me about the hydraulics and why they contiunued working, but they did. The pilots managed to glide the 747 from 10,000 metres onto a runway in a small town on the shore of Lake Manitoba: Gimli. That plane has always been known as the Gimli Glider since that day.