New Jersey stands tall against the book banning lunatics

[Politruk]

Most American tv content features more gay intimacy than straight intimacy.

Never seen two guys kiss on TV. Not even on Will and Grace. Matt, the gay dude on Melrose Place, was the only one of the cast who never got a makeout scene with hot guitar licks.

 

[UltraChad]

A thing which does not happen outside your head.

You're right it happens on the evening news.

 

[ll74]

It’s grooming and not appropriate.

Oooh.... fun .....moving goal posts

Grooming of course is seeing that same sex couples are intimate. Seeing opposite sex couples being intimate is fine. Because society, obviously defined by the right, is only acceptable their way.

If a minority is shown in a minority of books, is that acceptable? Asking from 1950.

 

[lessOHmo]

Now in Maryland

 

[Politruk]

It’s grooming and not appropriate.

Promoting minority groups as the dominant groups in society is grooming.

There is no such thing as grooming, you idiot.

 

[Politruk]

You're right it happens on the evening news.

Not there either.

 

[UltraChad]

Not there either.

Yup, there.

People are aware of what you and the other (D)egenerates are trying to do with their kids.

 

[Politruk]

Yup, there.

People are aware of what you and the other (D)egenerates are trying to do with their kids.

You've never posted a link to such an instance. If you ever do, it will turn out that the book in question is only objectionable to RW cranks, and the police were only called to stop one of those from disrupting the school board meeting.

 

[Politruk]

Never seen two guys kiss on TV. Not even on Will and Grace. Matt, the gay dude on Melrose Place, was the only one of the cast who never got a makeout scene with hot guitar licks.

Of course, I don't watch daytime TV. Is there gay action in the soap operas?

 

[Rightguide]

In other words, never.

Like the man said it happens all the time:

 

[ll74]

Lol

 

[Rightguide]

Lol

Like you, he steps in it every time he turns around.

 

[ll74]

Like you, he steps in it every time he turns around.

Wtf are you talking about?

 

[Rightguide]

Wtf are you talking about?

You need to become more cognizant of reality.

 

[ll74]

You need to become more cognizant of reality.

That doesn't answer the question

 

[Politruk]

Like the man said it happens all the time:

That is about Lucky, by Alice Sebold, which definitely belongs in school libraries. I can safely assume the rest are similar.

 

[UltraChad]

You've never posted a link to such an instance. If you ever do, it will turn out that the book in question is only objectionable to RW cranks, and the police were only called to stop one of those from disrupting the school board meeting.

You already ignore all facts and the most authoritative and reputable sources on the planet when they don't suit your narrative.

I could link a thousand instances in 2024 on film and 20 studies from the top 20 universities on the planet conducted by over 1,000 leading researchers including all the content itself where everyone could blatantly see how pornographic it was and you would just ignore it and persist in your woketard narrative.

You'd just link u a random tardwiki article where some E-rando gives you the confirmation bias you're looking for and declare that the end all be all fact source.

Why would I post any more evidence or cite any sources for you?? It's absolutely pointless.

 

[Politruk]

You already ignore all facts and the most authoritative and reputable sources on the planet when they don't suit your narrative.

I could link a thousand instances in 2024 on film and 20 studies from the top 20 universities on the planet conducted by over 1,000 leading researchers including all the content itself where everyone could blatantly see how pornographic it was and you would just ignore it and persist in your woketard narrative.

You'd just link u a random tardwiki article where some E-rando gives you the confirmation bias you're looking for and declare that the end all be all fact source.

Why would I post any more evidence or cite any sources for you?? It's absolutely pointless.

See post #91.

 

[UltraChad]

See post #91.

Thanks for demonstrating my point perfectly.

You just dismiss reality to support pornography for kids in public schools. You're a legit woketard ideologue.

 

[Politruk]

Thanks for demonstrating my point perfectly.

You just dismiss reality to support pornography for kids in public schools. You're a legit woketard ideologue.

Lucky ain't pornography.

 

[UltraChad]

Lucky ain't pornography.

It is, and you support it just like all the other Pampers Pirates.

 

[Politruk]

It is, and you support it just like all the other Pampers Pirates.

And pedophilia has no relevance to any of this. Nobody is defending school-library material because they want to groom students to be their sex partners.

 

[Politruk]

You've never posted a link to such an instance. If you ever do, it will turn out that the book in question is only objectionable to RW cranks, and the police were only called to stop one of those from disrupting the school board meeting.

And that is exactly how it turned out.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Yes, books featuring graphic butt fucking and other deviant behavior are the defensive bulwark against creeping fascism in Rob's mind.

Those are NOT the type of books being banned- AND YOU KNOW IT.

Stupid argument is... stupid.

What you (and the Fahrenheit 451 crowd) call "Graphic butt fucking" is merely books featuring gay or lesbian characters, with no description of sex at all.

 

[Politruk]

Anyone who wants to stop kids from reading A Handmaid's Tale or Heather Has Two Mommies is extremely un-American. And we all know this is really about books like that and not pornography.