Straight-8
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2005
- Posts
- 397
TBKahuna123 said:Since when was agreeing with infidelity a symbol of being openminded? That's just stupid. I'm sorry but in my opinion there's no justification for infidelity. If you are married you have made a promise, an oath to be faithful. Unless you and your partner have agreed to open up your marriage then you are breaking thair trust and your vows. There's no justification for that, period.That is a very high 'moral' position. One that many espouse and, I dare say, damn few live up to.
There is always the urge to preach to others about moral views. I'm trying to be practical. Like SEVERUS MAX says it's easy to say do without as long as it isn't you who is doing without. Unlike him I think her H's behaviour is malicious...at least 'wilful blindness'.
It may be a matter of interpretation. I read her as saying she's 'tried everything' (although she doesn't use that phrase) and now she has to make the tough choice. I tried to cover the 'other stuff' in my first three points. I still think she's in a no win on her options - it's which moral cesspool does she want to end up in? - or does she want to ignore conventional morality and respond to her needs?
".....Thus, our bawdiness,
Unpurged by epitaph, indulged at last,
Is equally converted into palms,
Squiggling like saxaphones. And palm for palm,
Madame, we are where we began. Allow,
Therefore, that in the planetary scene
Your disaffected flagellants, well-stuffed,
Smacking their muzzy bellies in parade,
Proud of such novelties of the sublime,
Such tink and tank and tunk-atunk-tunk,
May, merely may, madame, whip from themselves
A jovial hullabaloo among the spheres.
This will make widows wince. But fictive things
Wink as they will. Wink most when widows wince."