non-erotic stories

do you write about people you know online or IRL?
It has happened a few times, but I don't like to make it the rule.

how do you think of titles?
This sudden interest in titles really is interesting. What made you change your mind?

I usually try to find an expression that will be arousing, for one, maybe something intriguing or exotic, and at the same time it will have to be something about the core of whatever I'm choosing the title for. I'm not aware of the chemical and electrical processes envolved in my cerebral activity at that time, but I could try to find out...

is there any subject that is taboo that you wont write about- homicide, cannibalism, etc.?
No.
 
Lauren.Hynde said:


is there any subject that is taboo that you wont write about- homicide, cannibalism, etc.?
No.
really? Then why are you offended by the subject matter I chose?
Contradicting yourself again LH.
 
Oh dear, you must be getting confused again...

When did I say that I was offended by the subject matters you chose? Quote me, please, I must have been sleep-typing again...

And while you're at it, you might want to point out when did I contradict myself. It doesn't happen that often and I'd like to print it out and post it over my bed.
 
Lauren.Hynde said:
Oh dear, you must be getting confused again...

When did I say that I was offended by the subject matters you chose? Quote me, please, I must have been sleep-typing again...

And while you're at it, you might want to point out when did I contradict myself. It doesn't happen that often and I'd like to print it out and post it over my bed.
you stated I was "making threats" against people. I consider it material for a story, not something to take personally. You were offended were you not?
So, eating crow tonight?
 
You really need to quote me on that. C'mon, I know you can find at least one thing I said to substantiate that... Can you imagine what you'd look like if you couldn't?

:)

I'm going to take a quick shower but be back in 30 minutes. Please promise you're not going anywhere and start making sense any time soon...
 
Any luck yet?

And by the way, I guess we're all still glued to our seats waiting for those articles from the Constitutions to be posted.

Any minute now...
 
Lauren.Hynde said:


Please promise you're not going anywhere and start making sense any time soon...
boring.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you can 'few adjustments' to throw it into the bin and start a new one, this time with a plot, characters and voice, I agree with you.

It doesn't matter what you say, because up till now you have never said a single thing which you didn't contradict a second later. That's the difference between you and me. That's why you can't find anything to nitpick about me. That's why I have every write to criticize your writings. And that, my friend, is why you'll never earn any respect as a person, let alone a writer, be it from me or anyone else.

Oh, that's right. I forgot you don't need any of that. You only write for yourself.
 
Lauren.Hynde said:
And that, my friend, is why you'll never earn any respect as a person, let alone a writer, be it from me or anyone else.

Oh, that's right. I forgot you don't need any of that. You only write for yourself.
lol, you keep thinking that. Respect from people here? I dont think you people know what that word means. You haven't displayed it. Yes, I will continue writing because at least some people appreciate my work. I have yet to see you point out some of my contradictions
I have earned respect by my peers and teachers from college.
But of course, they dont matter because they aren't published :rolleyes:
 
The only logical explanaition for that is you can't read.

The biggest contradiction of them all is you're still here posting. I thought we weren't worthy of reading your work and you wouldn't be posting anything else. You've been saying that several times a day since April 12th...
 
FYI

You asked for legal proof, so, in case you're really interested, this is a recent landmark case:

Jake Baker had fantasies about torturing, raping and murdering a female student at the University of Michigan. He sent his story to alt.sex.stories giving the name of the classmate. He was arrested and held without bail, but a US District Count Judge dismissed the case against Baker ruling that he was protected by the First Amendment. Baker's case was tackled as a speech issue and although he had sick fantasies they did not involve immediate danger or any criminal activity. As far as I know, this was the end of it (the Appeals Court didn't even take up the appeal). See U.S. v. Baker, 890 F. Supp. 1375 (1995).

Simple fantasy stories do not constitute threats (unless there are clear indications that the author plans/intends to act that way in reality). Thus, they tend to be protected under the 1st Amendment. Although, one might have to go through a lot to finally make that point with lots of prosecutors and courts.

hs

PS It also seems that Mr DeSade is not quite as sure about himself as he wants to appear, given all the constant sanitizing of his posts.
 
Re: FYI

hiddenself said:
You asked for legal proof, so, in case you're really interested, this is a recent landmark case:

Jake Baker had fantasies about torturing, raping and murdering a female student at the University of Michigan. He sent his story to alt.sex.stories giving the name of the classmate. He was arrested and held without bail, but a US District Count Judge dismissed the case against Baker ruling that he was protected by the First Amendment.

Simple fantasy stories do not constitute threats (unless there are clear indications that the author plans/intends to act that way in reality). Thus, they tend to be protected under the 1st Amendment.
PS It also seems that Mr DeSade is not quite as sure about himself as he wants to appear, given all the constant sanitizing of his posts.
excuse you? I am very sure of myself and writing abilities. Sanitizing my posts? LOL, yeah ok. But thanks for posting that article.
One more time, I did not threaten ANYone. Deal with that fact.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top