silverwhisper
just this guy, you know?
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2005
- Posts
- 11,319
pmann, you didn't actually read the salon article, did you? no, of course not. because you aren't some ignorant fucking corporate apologist. but i do wonder if you aren't being willfully ignorant. because there's no fucking way in hell you could have actually read it and remained as blase about what it had to say as that.
since i suspect you skipped it, here are a few choice quotations.
also...
and let's talk about the productivity guidelines. physical labor has hard limits to what can be accomplished. it isn't like sales or being an asset manager where a new client can completely skyrocket your quarter: there's only so much that can be done in such work. where do those increases end?
so let's sum up: amazon maltreats its employees & pays them shit. of course a warehouse job isn't gonna pay particularly well* but employees have a justifiable expection that their employer to comply with common sense comfort requirements, never mind the OSHA ones, to provide a safe work environment.
your focusing on the pay thing is a classic case of missing the forest for the trees.
or is this where you reveal yourself to be one of those ayn rand-worshipping morons?
ed
*i have worked for company that actually paid nearly double that for warehouse staff, but they're obviously the exception, not the norm. there are some real benefits to privately-held employers vs public ones.
since i suspect you skipped it, here are a few choice quotations.
the article quoth:
at the allentown warehouse, stephen dallal, also a “picker,” found that his output targets increased the longer he worked at the warehouse, doubling after six months. “it started with 75 pieces an hour, then 100 pieces an hour. then 150 pieces an hour. they just got faster and faster.” he too was written up for not meeting his targets and was fired.
also...
you ever been to allentown, PA? i went to college not far from there. there isn't a whole lot in the way of jobs out there. this isn't surprising: warehouses are invariably constructed in places meeting 2 criterion: a) cheap land, and b) easy access to the transportation infrastructure. summer in that part of pennsylvania can be pretty humid, too.the article quoth:
the series revealed the lengths amazon was prepared to go to keep costs down and output high and yielded a singular image of amazon’s ruthlessness—ambulances stationed on hot days at the amazon center to take employees suffering from heat stroke to the hospital. despite the summer weather, there was no air-conditioning in the depot, and amazon refused to let fresh air circulate by opening loading doors at either end of the depot—for fear of theft. inside the plant there was no slackening of the pace, even as temperatures rose to more than 100 degrees.
and let's talk about the productivity guidelines. physical labor has hard limits to what can be accomplished. it isn't like sales or being an asset manager where a new client can completely skyrocket your quarter: there's only so much that can be done in such work. where do those increases end?
so let's sum up: amazon maltreats its employees & pays them shit. of course a warehouse job isn't gonna pay particularly well* but employees have a justifiable expection that their employer to comply with common sense comfort requirements, never mind the OSHA ones, to provide a safe work environment.
your focusing on the pay thing is a classic case of missing the forest for the trees.
or is this where you reveal yourself to be one of those ayn rand-worshipping morons?
ed
*i have worked for company that actually paid nearly double that for warehouse staff, but they're obviously the exception, not the norm. there are some real benefits to privately-held employers vs public ones.
Last edited: