Quick vocab elucidation?

I'd be quite happy for yours to be renamed 'American' instead of English :)

Indeed, so would a lot of my redneck fellow countrymen. Only I think they'd call it Amurrican. And they'd probably rename English muffins to Freedom Muffins as well if they could. ;)
 
Yes you can suffer from dyslexia and have it affect your written language skills in an ideographic language. All languages involve some form of sequencing and dyslexia is an inability to decode and reproduce sequences.

Anyone can have a stutter but no stutter has ever affected the written word.

Dyslexia has a language barrier
Kid speaks English and Japanese like a native, is dyslexic in only one language.....
I googled "dyslexia japanese" and this came up...
 
Gosh.

Given that they were speaking English in England, long before it was in spoken in America, don't you think that maybe their version is actually correct, and has simply been bastardised for other audiences?

:devil: :cool: ;) :D
First is not always best. We Americans refined it. We got rid of those unnecessary letters. Over the years, it has saved us an awful lot of toner in our printers. And their computer keyboards...the U must wear out faster!

Oh...not meaning anything by it, but as for bastardizing the language...you misspelled that word in your post. :rolleyes: Oh, God! Y'all don't add letters to the language too, do ya? :eek:

Say, I vote for changing the name of our language here, in the states. Instead of the English language, we should call it the American language. Then they can have their extra letters and everybody will be happier.

I remember when I had a story editor who lived in one of those countries that added the U. It wasn't long before her dictionary invaded and infested mine. It was scary. When I'd do spell check in Word it would want to ADD the U to words!!!!!! :mad::eek:
 
I remember when I had a story editor who lived in one of those countries that added the U. It wasn't long before her dictionary invaded and infested mine. It was scary. When I'd do spell check in Word it would want to ADD the U to words!!!!!! :mad::eek:

Uhhh...dictionarial imperialism?
 
There was once a thread that voiced these kinds of literary mistakes such as their or there...a word Nazi of sorts. I can't find the thread. It was a great thread. It would deal with dominate and dominant.

Woo Hoo! I found it!

Language Nazis Unite!
 
Last edited:
There was once a thread that voiced these kind of literary mistakes such as their or there...a word Nazi of sorts. I can't find the thread. It was a great thread. It would deal with dominate and dominant.
Are you saying the forum is currently without a language nazi/sadist?! :devil:
I'll fill those shoes!
 
First is not always best. We Americans refined it. We got rid of those unnecessary letters. Over the years, it has saved us an awful lot of toner in our printers. And their computer keyboards...the U must wear out faster!

Does this mean you think textspeak should be the next stage in this evolution? gr8t 4 saving toner. ;)
 
You're welcome:)


Language has a life of its own and evolves accordingly.



However, back to the OP I agree that looking for a 'dominate' is just plain wrong:rolleyes::D

:D
Not all that evolves survives....although the movie Idiocracy comes to mind.
Fry makes a good point, a great point- language is fluid and more complex than any set of rules....but fer cryin' out loud, it's one thing to butcher it when you know all the highways and bi-ways and another to just plod through, disinterested by virtue of ignorance.
 
Last edited:
Are you saying the forum is currently without a language nazi/sadist?! :devil:
I'll fill those shoes!
Check my post, above. I found the old thread. You could use it as a reference tool. FungiUg is still here. :eek: He lives in New Zealand! That's where my editor was from! :eek:
 
:D
Not all that evolves survives....although the movie Idiocracy comes to mind.
Fry makes a good point, a great point- language is fluid and more complex than any set of rules....but fer cryin' out loud, it's one thing to butcher it when you know all the highways and bi-ways and another to just plod through, disinterested by virtue of ignorance.

Quite right:cool:



That would be 'by-ways' not bi-ways:p


Just sayin';)
 
Check my post, above. I found the old thread. You could use it as a reference tool. FungiUg is still here. :eek: He lives in New Zealand! That's where my editor was from! :eek:
Then, statistically speaking, it's more likely the editor was actually a sheep.
And, way to go, hiding the link in an edit! :D

Quite right:cool:



That would be 'by-ways' not bi-ways:p


Just sayin';)
Are you opposed to people having bi-ways? :D
*damn! busted!*
 
Not at all, I have some myself:devil:

The problem with picking up someone else's mistakes or ignorance is - it highlights your own even more so;)

Alright. I'll be sadist-masochist then. I can take a good correction....and I think I'm talking about grammar and usage....:D
 
Oh...not meaning anything by it, but as for bastardizing the language...you misspelled that word in your post. :rolleyes: Oh, God! Y'all don't add letters to the language too, do ya? :eek:

*coughs*

Did not.

What's with the taking out a perfectly good s and turning it into a z thing anyways?

:D

I mean, there's a reason z is tucked down in the bottom corner of the keyboard, because it isn't meant to be used much! lol

(Mind you, I used a German laptop at uni once, with the z and the y switched around, because they don't use y much, and Word's spell check had a fricking field day!)
 
Does this mean you think textspeak should be the next stage in this evolution? gr8t 4 saving toner. ;)

Actually, we shouldn't jest about that.

Textspeak is actually no longer marked down in Year 12 English exams here, so long as the point has been clearly expressed.

I weep.
 
*coughs*

Did not.

What's with the taking out a perfectly good s and turning it into a z thing anyways?

:D

I mean, there's a reason z is tucked down in the bottom corner of the keyboard, because it isn't meant to be used much! lol

(Mind you, I used a German laptop at uni once, with the z and the y switched around, because they don't use y much, and Word's spell check had a fricking field day!)
But QWERTY keyboards are meant to slow down typists, so as not to block type-writers. :confused:
 
Is that so bad?

Well, I guess it doesn't matter, really. If the language is evolving with walrus tusks and lizard wings, that is where it will go.

I don't particularly care for 1960s-70s concrete modern buildings, either, even though they were absolutely utilitarian and expressed the available technology.

Think of some words that you find beautiful, and type or write them out with textspeak equivalents. The textspeak is more economical, yes, without all the architectural detail. But not enobling or evocative. At least to me, it's not.

Actually, we shouldn't jest about that.

Textspeak is actually no longer marked down in Year 12 English exams here, so long as the point has been clearly expressed.

I weep.

I'd hate to have to read those papers. This makes my brain hurt.
 
Back
Top