Republican Leadership Is A Threat To America

Trump wasn't possible because of the 'swamp', he invented the 'swamp'.
Trump did not invent political corruption in Washington DC and financial stich-ups/censorships in places like Wall Street and Silicon Valley. Those things are a reality, even though he's a narcissist that wants to enrich himself. Before social media started to be heavily censored, they first targeted open figures of the far right, the sort of people that the majority would just say "They deserve it", but next the censors came for anyone who expresses their opinions that don't chime with media brainwashing, resulting in "fact checking" all over the place.

He's a pure salesman, of the worst sort. He invents a problem, sells you the only possible solution (his).
Absolutely, but the "problems he invents" have a grain of truth in them. The biggest lies must be shrouded in truth. Democrats either act like there is no problem at all, or they downplay/ignore it and act like there is no possible solution, giving Trump the opportunity to come along and say "I have the solution". Democrats then attack Trump with arms of the law, thereby playing into the perception of him being a "political outsider" being witch-hunted.

If Bernie Sanders had been Trump's opponent in 2016, this wouldn't have happened. Sanders would have challenged Trump on policies, talking about the billionaire class, and kept personal attacks as few in number as possible. Instead, Trump's opponent was Hillary Clinton, who alienated the "blue wall" and has a long history of warmongering, which Trump exploited, while the attempted "end of Trump's political career" Access Hollywood leak backfired when he faced it down and bought women allegedly abused by Bill Clinton into public.
 
Trump did not invent political corruption...
Trump is absolutely the most corrupt politician in American history. He is only running again so that he can try to pardon himself for his crimes that his own attorneys are admitting to. If you cannot see that, you are a mark.

The only thing he has achieved (apart from the benefit to his own bank balance) is confirmation of the principle that you have the right to lie and he as a politician has the right to lie to you. His own lawyers have stood up in court and said this and it is now accepted and enshrined for ever more.

Oh yes, plus he built an extra fifteen miles of border wall, some of which blew over in the first storm.

Do you tithe to his defense fund?
 
ITs kinda scary that if Sarah Palin ran out and asked if I missed her yet I'd embrace her so hard! Christ back when they were wacky, but okay she was dumb but I never thought of her as dangeorus.
 
Do you tithe to his defense fund?
Er, no. How stupid do you think I am? I've got bills to pay and kids to feed.

ITs kinda scary that if Sarah Palin ran out and asked if I missed her yet I'd embrace her so hard! Christ back when they were wacky, but okay she was dumb but I never thought of her as dangeorus.
Less "dangerous" perhaps, but they worried me more, with all that religious nonsense while deferring to the system.
 
trumpers hate women and trans in positions of middle management in the military but they want a doughy ball of rotting flesh to be their c.i.c.

1692048357956.jpg
 
I'm not so sure that would have disqualified Dumbya, actually. He had a long list of incredibly callous remarks to his credit, but the media mostly let it slide because he said them with that adorable smirk.
I was staggered that so many people voted for Dubya in 2004 considering the unfolding and ongoing Iraq disaster at the time. He had a near 12 million increase in his votal total compared to 2000, which is crazy. It's still the only presidential election from 1992 onwards where the Republican candidate won the popular vote, even though John Kerry came closer to victory in 2004 than people remember (had Kerry won Ohio, he'd have won the election).
 
this conservative wisconsin supreme court judge, under fire for editing her own wiki page claiming it distorted her record and she'd been 'forced' to do it. a case of it's okay for them to act immorally or illegally when we choose to do so:

She changed her entry to say the press had "misleadingly suggested" that she compared stay-at-home Covid-19 lockdown orders to the forced internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII. Previously, the page had simply stated that Bradley had compared the two events.
the text she added, under an anonymous username they traced back to her email account since it was so easily decoded, came mid-sentence in what was already there and has since been restored to its original text:

wrote in a concurring opinion to the decision that overturned Secretary Palm's orders that 'Although headlines may sensationalize the invocation of cases such as Korematsu, the point of citing them is not to draw comparisons between the circumstances of people horrifically interned by their government during a war and those of people subjected to isolation orders during a pandemic.
We mention cases like Korematsu in order to test the limits of government authority, to remind the state that urging courts to approve the exercise of extraordinary power during times of emergency may lead to extraordinary abuses of its citizens.'

"The media misleadingly suggested she


her actual words at the 2020 event:

"I'll direct your attention to another time in history, the Korematsu decision [the decision to intern Japanese-Americans],where the court said the need for action was great and time was short and that justified, and I'm quoting, 'assembling together and placing under guard all those of Japanese ancestry in assembly centers' during World War II.
"Could the secretary [of the Wisconsin Department of Health Services] . . . order people out of their homes into centers where they are properly socially distanced in order to combat the pandemic? . . . The point of my question is, what are the limits, constitutional or statutory?"
draw your own conclusions, folks

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...1&cvid=8df61af60ed24d72a7557e0a5b23c873&ei=71
 
I was staggered that so many people voted for Dubya in 2004 considering the unfolding and ongoing Iraq disaster at the time. He had a near 12 million increase in his votal total compared to 2000, which is crazy. It's still the only presidential election from 1992 onwards where the Republican candidate won the popular vote, even though John Kerry came closer to victory in 2004 than people remember (had Kerry won Ohio, he'd have won the election).
9/11 was very kind to him. Unless you believe it was an inside job it seemed like he was doing a good job.
 
"Consensus is the opposite of leadership" - Nikki Hailey

👀
 
9/11 was very kind to him. Unless you believe it was an inside job it seemed like he was doing a good job.
He joked about it. At least twice, if you include his WMD’s more so.

Kept reading his damn book after he said he watched the first plane hit. Oh? Really?? How!!??
 
Back
Top