Republican Leadership Is A Threat To America

During the midterm primary elections, at least 10 counties — including four in Pennsylvania — refused to certify accurate election results. After the general election, counties in Arizona and Pennsylvania refused to certify election results that saw Democratic candidates for governor, U.S. Senate and Congress prevail.

Once again, my legal team was forced to bring litigation to protect against election subversion. We sued Cochise County, Arizona and Luzerne County, Pennsylvania and won as they ultimately certified their results. Democracy was protected for at least one more election cycle.

The Fight To Certify Elections Has Already Begun

Most importantly, for undecided voters, I hope that it sharpens the stake of this election. I hope it causes them to ask why, if the GOP is so sure it offers the best choice for America, it is committed to depriving its citizens of fair election results.
 

Deplorable to the end. Which is likely to literally come for her next week in her Missouri primary.
I don't agree with her language, but look at the language YOUR SIDE uses when they are pissed. The language you have used to describe black conservatives, gay conservatives, Christians, and any number of people YOU disagree with, even on this site, her language is mild in comparison. Condemn the language YOUR side uses if you are going to condemn hers.

Second, the SUBSTANCE of what she says isn't wrong. Are you telling me that you would be okay, if Mike Tyson or some heavyweight male boxer suddenly identified as a woman, and now was allowed to compete in women's boxing? Or some major NBA star, suddenly identifying as a woman, is allowed in women's basketball, or NFL player suddenly allowed in women's football? If you support that, you are insane. That would end (and has ended) with serious injury and even hospitalization of women who trained their entire life to master their sports.

Look, there are physical differences between men and women beyond that of genitalia. There is a different muscle structure, a different center of balance. Men are usually more physically muscular than women. There are exceptions, but exceptions don't disprove the rule, they prove it BECAUSE they are, by definition, exceptions to the rule.

In the military, there are lower PT standards for women than for men, because biological women are built differently than men. I'm sorry if that offends you, but that's just biology. To quote your people, follow the science.

And THAT is why she is so pissed. Biological women are being beat up badly by biological men in sports, all under the name of equality. Once upon a time, that would have been understood as the abuse that it is. Now that physical abuse of women is celebrated. It's sickening to anyone with any inkling of respect for women and womanhood.

Don't like what I just said, make the scientific and biological case against it. But don't make some touchy feely emotional argument that uses emotions and feelings to bypass facts.
 
https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...on-north-carolina-abortion-stance-shift-2024/

Mark Robinson, North Carolina GOP gubernatorial candidate, previous stance on abortion:

in 2019 where he said abortions are not “about protecting the lives of mothers,” but rather the procedure is “about killing the child because you weren’t responsible to keep your skirt down.”

In the past, the GOP official regularly said abortion was “murder” and “genocide,” comparing the anti-abortion movement to the efforts to end slavery, CNN reported.

and now:
Robinson added that he is also backing the state’s 12-week abortion law because it “provides common sense exceptions,” including protecting the life of the mother or in case of rape or incest.
which sounds better, but some NC churches are speaking out against his current positioning as untrustworthy, given all his history of vile rhetoric against immigrants, abortions, democrats and more

could his sudden change of tone come from
a) the gop knows the more extreme voice against abortion will lose them votes
or
b) someone came up with the receipts about this personal story and his team needed him to get out in front of it? sounds pretty much as if it was his wife's decision more than his given that virulent comment about 'killing the child because you weren’t responsible to keep your skirt down' and it's something he's never forgiven her for.

“Thirty years ago, my wife and I made a very difficult decision. We had an abortion,” he said in the advertisement shared online.
he said the medical procedure was a “solid pain” between him and his wife that they “never spoke” about.

It’s something that stays with me forever,” Yolanda Hill, his wife, said as they held hands in the video.

 
Are you really this dumb or just contrarian?
YOUR presidential nominee, after the second presidential election cycle in a row where competition was kept off ballots in order to make sure the anointed candidate won, left even those voters lied to. Your nominee was not voted on by the people, she was selected in back room deals. Meantime, like Trump or hate him, he was chosen by the people, and that in spite of certain Democrat states keeping him off the ballot. The Republicans have a candidate chosen by the people. The Democrats have a candidate selected by the party elite, then the people are being told to just accept and line up behind her. But you have the audacity to claim that it is the Dems who are all about election integrity and Democracy, and the Republicans who are the party of ignoring the will of the people. You really are out your minds.
 
https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...on-north-carolina-abortion-stance-shift-2024/

Mark Robinson, North Carolina GOP gubernatorial candidate, previous stance on abortion:





and now:

which sounds better, but some NC churches are speaking out against his current positioning as untrustworthy, given all his history of vile rhetoric against immigrants, abortions, democrats and more

could his sudden change of tone come from
a) the gop knows the more extreme voice against abortion will lose them votes
or
b) someone came up with the receipts about this personal story and his team needed him to get out in front of it? sounds pretty much as if it was his wife's decision more than his given that virulent comment about 'killing the child because you weren’t responsible to keep your skirt down' and it's something he's never forgiven her for.
Again, whether or not you like what he said, abortion is killing a baby. Period. The fact that he knows the guilt and pain of having been through it doesn't negate the truth of what he said. The loudest and most vehement voices against abortion are those of former abortion providers and women who have themselves had abortions. They learned first hand the vile murder of innocent lives abortion it. And, yes, the pro-life movement IS in fact today's abolitionist or anti-genicide movement. Whether or not you recognize that fact doesn't make it less true.
 
Why jay? Why?
What are you doin here ruining a safe haven thread with your lies? Did the gatekeepers BS finally run outta steam?
I ain't gonna rehash abortion with you - at this point that subject is a jerking off source for your pseudo christianity.
YOUR presidential nominee never attended a debate - cheating voters, repubs and independents, out of hearing him make a legit case for his campaign against other repubs. He installed his, gimme a sec while I check my notes, daughter in law as the head of the RNC and she instantly declared it's trumpism or else. A "Yay! :nana:" for democracy for sure. All this occurred while he was on trial and saying that he would, maybe, yes, kinda, take the stand and make the case of his innocence. He didn't. Never was gonna. I'm guessing your brand of religious beliefs is more ok with the selling of bibles than the placing hands for truth and oath touching thing.
YOUR candidate bet that the conservative voter didn't need to do anything during the campaign except send him more kizash and he was goddamn right! How embarrassingly low an esteem you and your elk have capitulated to being! We are now in the general election and you're anger/disappointment REALLY is that the rest of America is not as stupid and accepting of lies and criminal behavior as you and your fake christianity are.
 
Last edited:
YOUR presidential nominee, after the second presidential election cycle in a row where competition was kept off ballots in order to make sure the anointed candidate won, left even those voters lied to. Your nominee was not voted on by the people, she was selected in back room deals. Meantime, like Trump or hate him, he was chosen by the people, and that in spite of certain Democrat states keeping him off the ballot. The Republicans have a candidate chosen by the people. The Democrats have a candidate selected by the party elite, then the people are being told to just accept and line up behind her. But you have the audacity to claim that it is the Dems who are all about election integrity and Democracy, and the Republicans who are the party of ignoring the will of the people. You really are out your minds.
This entire post shows your ignorance. Primaries and party nominations are not any type of official election. The parties get to determine their own rules for nominating their own candidates. As it turns out, Democrats don't really have rules for how they choose their candidate. The Republicans happen to have a rule that requires them to follow the primary voters. Primaries are not regulated, there are no national or state rules regarding how candidates are chosen. For neither party is it the will of the people...it's basically a poll of registered party members. States defer to the parties to tell them who the candidate is.

So...what that means is if you're a registered Republican, you can choose your candidate. If you're a registered Democrat, you have entrusted party leadership to choose the candidate. Your opinion of how the Democrats operate, since I'm pretty sure you're not a registered Democrat, is none of your fucking business.

Regarding states trying to keep Trump off the ballot, maybe if he hadn't participated in insurrection, we wouldn't have had to have this conversation. In the end he's on the ballot, so your boy can lose those states anyway. Ohio tried to keep the Democrat nominee off the ballot as well. It's all part of the game and really doesn't have any impact because everywhere that potentially was going to happen, the candidate potentially being left off the ballot will never win those states.
 
YOUR presidential nominee, after the second presidential election cycle in a row where competition was kept off ballots in order to make sure the anointed candidate won, left even those voters lied to. Your nominee was not voted on by the people, she was selected in back room deals. Meantime, like Trump or hate him, he was chosen by the people, and that in spite of certain Democrat states keeping him off the ballot. The Republicans have a candidate chosen by the people. The Democrats have a candidate selected by the party elite, then the people are being told to just accept and line up behind her. But you have the audacity to claim that it is the Dems who are all about election integrity and Democracy, and the Republicans who are the party of ignoring the will of the people. You really are out your minds.
Harris raised more money in a month than Trump has on hand. Record breaking volunteers have signed up, record breaking voter registrations, she literally broke zoom during one of her many zoooms for Harris that were started by black women.

The people have spoken, sporto.
 
Last edited:
Why jay? Why?
What are you doin here ruining a safe haven thread with your lies? Did the gatekeepers BS finally run outta steam?
I ain't gonna rehash abortion with you - at this point that subject is a jerking off source for your pseudo christianity.
YOUR presidential nominee never attended a debate - cheating voters, repubs and independents, out of hearing him make a legit case for his campaign against other repubs. He installed his, gimme a sec while I check my notes, daughter in law as the head of the RNC and she instantly declared it's trumpism or else. A "Yay! :nana:" for democracy for sure. All this occurred while he was on trial and saying that he would, maybe, yes, kinda, take the stand and make the case of his innocence. He didn't. Never was gonna. I'm guessing your brand of religious beliefs is more ok with the selling of bibles than the placing hands for truth and oath touching thing.
YOUR candidate bet that the conservative voter didn't need to do anything during the campaign except send him more kizash and he was goddamn right! How embarrassingly low an esteem you and your elk have capitulated to being! We are now in the general election and you're anger/disappointment REALLY is that the rest of America is not as stupid and accepting of lies and criminal behavior as you and your fake christianity are.
Every statement you are citing was lifted completely out of its context. Meantime everything I said about what your party has done is what they DID.

Oh, and any decent lawyer will tell you that, no matter how innocent you are, the worst thing you can do is take the stand. Any opposing lawyer will rip you apart and twist any statements to make you look guilty. Taking the stand on your own defense is any opposing lawyer's wet dream.
 
This entire post shows your ignorance. Primaries and party nominations are not any type of official election. The parties get to determine their own rules for nominating their own candidates. As it turns out, Democrats don't really have rules for how they choose their candidate. The Republicans happen to have a rule that requires them to follow the primary voters. Primaries are not regulated, there are no national or state rules regarding how candidates are chosen. For neither party is it the will of the people...it's basically a poll of registered party members. States defer to the parties to tell them who the candidate is.

So...what that means is if you're a registered Republican, you can choose your candidate. If you're a registered Democrat, you have entrusted party leadership to choose the candidate. Your opinion of how the Democrats operate, since I'm pretty sure you're not a registered Democrat, is none of your fucking business.

Regarding states trying to keep Trump off the ballot, maybe if he hadn't participated in insurrection, we wouldn't have had to have this conversation. In the end he's on the ballot, so your boy can lose those states anyway. Ohio tried to keep the Democrat nominee off the ballot as well. It's all part of the game and really doesn't have any impact because everywhere that potentially was going to happen, the candidate potentially being left off the ballot will never win those states.
Everything you just said only proves that you trust party elites more than voters. That is the most anti-democratic thing you could possibly have said. But then your party is losing voters because of it. You just admitted that Republicans trust the voters Dems trust the party dictators. Way to prove your point.
 
Harris raised more money in a month than Trump has on hand. Record breaking volunteers have signed up, record breaking voter registrations, she literally broke zoom during one of her many zoooms for Harris that were started by black women.

The people have spoken, sporto.
Hmmm... Whites all getting together to advise a black woman who wasn't touting her backness, but rather her Indian heritage until it became politically advantageous. And that woman claiming to be African American when there is nothing African about her heritage.... But yeah... Do please continue.
 
Harris raised more money in a month than Trump has on hand. Record breaking volunteers have signed up, record breaking voter registrations, she literally broke zoom during one of her many zoooms for Harris that were started by black women.

The people have spoken, sporto.
By the way, Harris has never won even one national election on her own merit. And the people who did vote for her on state level have very often voiced their regret. Yes indeed, the people have spoken. They don't like or want her.
 
Hmmm... Whites all getting together to advise a black woman who wasn't touting her backness, but rather her Indian heritage until it became politically advantageous. And that woman claiming to be African American when there is nothing African about her heritage.... But yeah... Do please continue.
All of this is utter nonsense.

Have yourself a grand day!
 
Every statement you are citing was lifted completely out of its context. Meantime everything I said about what your party has done is what they DID.

Oh, and any decent lawyer will tell you that, no matter how innocent you are, the worst thing you can do is take the stand. Any opposing lawyer will rip you apart and twist any statements to make you look guilty. Taking the stand on your own defense is any opposing lawyer's wet dream.
What did I say that was out of context? What???

I've given you credit in the past for being intelligent. Misguided? Yes! A christian fraud? Yes! But still a member of intelligence. Don't insult mine and others watching now by taking out of context what I wrote. I know, you know, taking the stand is ill advised. The ass known as trump knows it too, but that's not what he was saying to the public or the media. Try again, please.
 
All of this is utter nonsense.

Have yourself a grand day!
Is it though? "White Women for Harris", "White Men for Harris". Had Trump done a stunt like that you would have openly condemned him as that action being racist as hell.

As for the rest, prove me wrong.
 
What did I say that was out of context? What???

I've given you credit in the past for being intelligent. Misguided? Yes! A christian fraud? Yes! But still a member of intelligence. Don't insult mine and others watching now by taking out of context what I wrote. I know, you know, taking the stand is ill advised. The ass known as trump knows it too, but that's not what he was saying to the public or the media. Try again, please.
Trump, in an overly grandiose, and admittedly flawed statement, said he would fix America's issues so completely that there would be no need to vote BECAUSE no one would be able to or willing to undo the prosperity. It wasn't a promise to eliminate elections. The context was clear. You side has done your typical hypocrite hair on fire reaction over the statement.

As for hiring in his daughter, he's hiring the people he can trust. Do you really blame him? And with the globalist sellouts running so much of the RNC, her statement is a direct response to that.

Do we really want to start quoting Dems?
 
Back
Top