Republican Leadership Is A Threat To America

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1819868451365855489

https://twitter.com/x/status/1819943894815301817

 

[SmokingFap]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1820902376955408430

 

[JaySecrets]

You have the audacity to call Conservative news and information sources "unreliable" and "propaganda", then promote the revisionist lines of BS this pathetic, dishonest commentator puts out? You really are unhinged! Seriously, this guy is off his rocker and does nothing but push Dem approved party talking points, couching them in video clips cherrypicked and out of any semblance of context. I really do pity you for the ignorance you live in. The most pathetic, I think, is when he blasts the Supreme Court Justice for going on Fox News and simply talking about how successful the current configuration of the court has been, not based on ideological decisions, but on the court's ability to compromise and come to unanimous and nearly unanimous decisions 40% of the time. Those are, in fact, extraordinary numbers. He made no political or ideological statement. Not one. Yet your liberal propagandist called it a stunt and called Fox News the State Run Media! Have you LOOKED at the beliefs, worldviews, and positions of "The State" these days? They are as antithetical to Conservatism as oil is to water, and they loathe Trump, Scott, Vance, Carson, Walker, Elder, Haley, and any other person who dares express any sort of actual patriotism or Conservatism. I have never heard such a line of pure crap in my life as was spewed from that man's mouth. If THIS is your "authoritative source", you are worse off and further gone than I thought.

 

[SmokingFap]

You have the audacity to call Conservative news and information sources "unreliable" and "propaganda", then promote the revisionist lines of BS this pathetic, dishonest commentator puts out? You really are unhinged! Seriously, this guy is off his rocker and does nothing but push Dem approved party talking points, couching them in video clips cherrypicked and out of any semblance of context. I really do pity you for the ignorance you live in. The most pathetic, I think, is when he blasts the Supreme Court Justice for going on Fox News and simply talking about how successful the current configuration of the court has been, not based on ideological decisions, but on the court's ability to compromise and come to unanimous and nearly unanimous decisions 40% of the time. Those are, in fact, extraordinary numbers. He made no political or ideological statement. Not one. Yet your liberal propagandist called it a stunt and called Fox News the State Run Media! Have you LOOKED at the beliefs, worldviews, and positions of "The State" these days? They are as antithetical to Conservatism as oil is to water, and they loathe Trump, Scott, Vance, Carson, Walker, Elder, Haley, and any other person who dares express any sort of actual patriotism or Conservatism. I have never heard such a line of pure crap in my life as was spewed from that man's mouth. If THIS is your "authoritative source", you are worse off and further gone than I thought.

I posted a video clip without comment. I didn't call anything "authoritative". Take a laxative, or try masturbating. You're like Helen Keller when she stubbed her toe. You're so upset, you scream and scream until your fingers are blue.

 

[butters]

Georgia’s state board of elections adopted new rules for local election boards that permit them to withhold the certification of a vote in the face of unspecified discrepancies – a Republican-led move that could cause uncertainty and confusion after future election days.

The five-person board passed the measure in a 3-2 vote. The three board members who voted for it – Dr Janice Johnson, Rick Jeffares and Janelle King – were praised by name three days ago by Donald Trump at an Atlanta campaign rally.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=fe2841ffe2194aafad3772c842b03434&ei=107

 

[JaySecrets]

I posted a video clip without comment. I didn't call anything "authoritative". Take a laxative, or try masturbating. You're like Helen Keller when she stubbed her toe. You're so upset, you scream and scream until your fingers are blue.

I know your side considers this moron authoritative. I know because his videos have been posted more than once as "authoritative" evidence against my position or for your position in debates on here. The guy is nothing more than a shill who vomits out the latest party line. I didn't like it when Rush occasionally did it on an issue on the Republican side (though he didn't do it too often), I don't like it when Hannidy does it, or Fox News... It is insulting and dishonest no matter who does it. Your guy, though, takes the cake.

 

[adrina]

I know your side considers this moron authoritative. I know because his videos have been posted more than once as "authoritative" evidence against my position or for your position in debates on here. The guy is nothing more than a shill who vomits out the latest party line. I didn't like it when Rush occasionally did it on an issue on the Republican side (though he didn't do it too often), I don't like it when Hannidy does it, or Fox News... It is insulting and dishonest no matter who does it. Your guy, though, takes the cake.

You seem to be a bit hot about it. The reality is that MTN has been picking up the slack where MSM has and is failing. They've got a lot of good commentators and a lot of knowledge on that team.

What is ironic is you talking about anyone vomiting out anything given your posting style. Not to be rude, but you post some of the craziest long winded bullshit. You don't have a lot of standing to criticize anyone for what they put out there to consume.

 

[JaySecrets]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...&cvid=fe2841ffe2194aafad3772c842b03434&ei=107

Not really sure what the issue is here. Aside from the dystopian tones MSNBC puts on the story, much like a movie soundtrack turning a simple walk down the hall simply by changing the music, there is nothing wrong being done. The county is simply saying that there shouldn't be discrepancies in voting numbers, and so they shouldn't be certifying votes until any discrepancies are resolved. The only ones who would object to that are people who are cheating.

 

[SmokingFap]

I know your side considers this moron authoritative. I know because his videos have been posted more than once as "authoritative" evidence against my position or for your position in debates on here. The guy is nothing more than a shill who vomits out the latest party line. I didn't like it when Rush occasionally did it on an issue on the Republican side (though he didn't do it too often), I don't like it when Hannidy does it, or Fox News... It is insulting and dishonest no matter who does it. Your guy, though, takes the cake.

I don't particularly care for Ben as a political commentator, but he does a good job of assembling news clips, which are informative. I enjoyed the compilations of Trump and his idiot followers that his people put together. But Ben's not my guy. I much prefer Michael Popock on that channel. But they're both legitimate lawyers, Popock moreso, which is 100% more than most of the conservative commentators can say. So fuck right off.

 

[SmokingFap]

Not really sure what the issue is here. Aside from the dystopian tones MSNBC puts on the story, much like a movie soundtrack turning a simple walk down the hall simply by changing the music, there is nothing wrong being done. The county is simply saying that there shouldn't be discrepancies in voting numbers, and so they shouldn't be certifying votes until any discrepancies are resolved. The only ones who would object to that are people who are cheating.

The Republicans will define what a discrepancy is, and they will use the law to change the results of an election unilaterally. Which means the Republicans, as always, are the ones who are cheating. But of course you don't see anything wrong with that.

 

[SmokingFap]

I know your side considers this moron authoritative. I know because his videos have been posted more than once as "authoritative" evidence against my position or for your position in debates on here. The guy is nothing more than a shill who vomits out the latest party line. I didn't like it when Rush occasionally did it on an issue on the Republican side (though he didn't do it too often), I don't like it when Hannidy does it, or Fox News... It is insulting and dishonest no matter who does it. Your guy, though, takes the cake.

THIS guy (not MY guy) didn't get bludgeoned with a $700 million-plus lawsuit for spreading lies. Rudy, Mike Pillow, Sydney Powell, and other Trump acolytes owe or will owe millions and millions of dollars for lying for servile, delusional political reasons. I would posit that all of them take the cake.

 

[adrina]

I don't particularly care for Ben as a political commentator, but he does a good job of assembling news clips, which are informative. I enjoyed the compilations of Trump and his idiot followers that his people put together. But Ben's not my guy. I much prefer Michael Popock on that channel. But they're both legitimate lawyers, Popock moreso, which is 100% more than most of the conservative commentators can say. So fuck right off.

What's interesting to me is the opinion of them toeing the party line. They commit to two principles: pro-democracy and anti-trump. The most annoying thing about Ben is that he talks too slow. He can get a bit repetitive and loves giving Trump a bad time. I often listen to him at 1.5 speed. Heh. It is of note that he broadcasts messages and posts from anti-trump republicans and conservatives.

 

[SmokingFap]

What's interesting to me is the opinion of them toeing the party line. They commit to two principles: pro-democracy and anti-trump. The most annoying thing about Ben is that he talks too slow. He can get a bit repetitive and loves giving Trump a bad time. I often listen to him at 1.5 speed. Heh. It is of note that he broadcasts messages and posts from anti-trump republicans and conservatives.

He seems to pad the runtime of his videos, even unintentionally. I hated when he was talking about Trump's legal cases. He kept saying "Judge Aileen Cannon" and "Special Prosecutor Jack Smith" and "former president Donald Trump". He never switches to just last names, when everybody knows exactly who he's talking about. Super annoying. Like I said, I don't like him as a commentator, but he and his channel do post informative content. They are very good at breaking down and explaining the applicable laws in legal cases they cover. Kind of like Legal Eagle, but with a much more political (and obviously partisan) bent.

 

[Pad_Foot]

‘rump is not into Manifesto 2025??
Why is his Schedule F enactment still up in his website ?
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.go...e-order-creating-schedule-f-excepted-service/

 

[JaySecrets]

The Republicans will define what a discrepancy is, and they will use the law to change the results of an election unilaterally. Which means the Republicans, as always, are the ones who are cheating. But of course you don't see anything wrong with that.

As though Dems defining discrepancy is going to be an honest move. If your side made a similar move you would be celebrating it. You cannot show ONE example of Republicans cheating. Dems have been caught in the act and not penalized, and had the cases buried by Dem Governors, lawmakers, and AG's all across the country. Republicans in Fulton County are not seeking to cheat. Cheating would be what the Dems did in the last election. Republicans are trying to spare the Republic another dishonest election by making sure fake ballots (you know, "mail in" ballots that somehow arrived en mass without ever having been mailed, ballots from dead people, more ballots than the entire population of the county, that sort of thing) aren't canceling out legit votes. Thank God for a few honest leaders who are willing to stand under fire and oppose lying cheaters like those you follow.

 

[JaySecrets]

I don't particularly care for Ben as a political commentator, but he does a good job of assembling news clips, which are informative. I enjoyed the compilations of Trump and his idiot followers that his people put together. But Ben's not my guy. I much prefer Michael Popock on that channel. But they're both legitimate lawyers, Popock moreso, which is 100% more than most of the conservative commentators can say. So fuck right off.

if you bothered to actually peek outside your bubble, you would find that when Conservative media is making a legal point, they call on very accomplished law experts and lawyers, even some prominent Dem lawyers, to argue the case. Take a couple day's viewing time and go through all the legal argument segments from Fox, NewsMax, Sky, and whatever other conservative source that comes to mind when it comes to these interviews. The sheer number and density of amount of lawyers and qualifications they carry, as well as the worldview variety, will quickly give the lie to your claim.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Thank God for a few honest leaders who are willing to stand under fire and oppose lying cheaters

What are their names?

if you can invoke God for their existence, surely you can tell us who they are?

 

[SmokingFap]

if you bothered to actually peek outside your bubble, you would find that when Conservative media is making a legal point, they call on very accomplished law experts and lawyers, even some prominent Dem lawyers, to argue the case. Take a couple day's viewing time and go through all the legal argument segments from Fox, NewsMax, Sky, and whatever other conservative source that comes to mind when it comes to these interviews. The sheer number and density of amount of lawyers and qualifications they carry, as well as the worldview variety, will quickly give the lie to your claim.

I was talking about conservative COMMENTATORS in specific. I actually used to watch Fox quite a bit, if only to see what the enemy was saying. Fox does occasionally have a reputable lawyer on there, but if they're not towing the Trump line, they get belittled and disregarded. However, from any legal analyst on any network or YouTube channel, I'm looking for a lawyer or legal expert to break down the specific laws, not tell me whether something should or shouldn't be done. I look for information, not guidance on how to think about the information.

 

[SmokingFap]

As though Dems defining discrepancy is going to be an honest move. If your side made a similar move you would be celebrating it.

No, I wouldn't. Because there has never been widespread voter fraud or election fraud, other than what Trump and his cronies tried to pull off. Minor "discrepancies" have and always will exist, and they are efficiently dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Usually on BOTH sides.

You cannot show ONE example of Republicans cheating.

You're joking, right? Google's really easy to use, you know.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...l-voted-illegally-nine-judge-rules-rcna145563

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/republicans-voter-fraud-convictions-2024-rcna146434

https://iowastartingline.com/2023/11/21/iowa-republican-activist-found-guilty-of-voter-fraud/

Like Captain America said, I can do this all day.

Dems have been caught in the act and not penalized, and had the cases buried by Dem Governors, lawmakers, and AG's all across the country.

Citation needed. Facts don't care about your feelings.

Republicans in Fulton County are not seeking to cheat.

Right. It's only the Democrats. Just ask Rudy Giuliani. How much does he still owe Ruby and Shay?

Cheating would be what the Dems did in the last election.

Prove it, or shut the fuck up.

Republicans are trying to spare the Republic another dishonest election by making sure fake ballots (you know, "mail in" ballots that somehow arrived en mass without ever having been mailed, ballots from dead people, more ballots than the entire population of the county, that sort of thing) aren't canceling out legit votes.

Most of what you listed is a bunch of delusional MAGA conspiracy theories. ESPECIALLY THE CRAP ABOUT MORE BALLOTS THAN POPULATION. And most of the actual fraud was committed by Republicans (as in several cases of them voting for their dead parents) who claimed they were countering imagined Democrat fraud.

Thank God for a few honest leaders who are willing to stand under fire and oppose lying cheaters like those you follow.

Your whole post, and life, apparently, is just a bunch of anti-reality bullshit.

 

[dkovic77]

‘rump is not into Manifesto 2025??
Why is his Schedule F enactment still up in his website ?
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.go...e-order-creating-schedule-f-excepted-service/

But he SAID it… and that makes it true. Everything the Orange Jesus says is 148% true!

Wait a decimal error.. 1.48%

He’s been far off on things, more than usual…. Maybe some decline there…

 

[Pad_Foot]

Wait a decimal error.. 1.48% true

The kernel of truth wrapped in shit
“We told the truth!”

 

[dkovic77]

The kernel of truth wrapped in shit
“We told the truth!”

The bulk of the criminal in chief’s followers aren’t interested in truth though….if they were he wouldn’t be their nominee.

So either they are THAT stupid…. Or just that….

 

[SmokingFap]

The bulk of the criminal in chief’s followers aren’t interested in truth though….if they were he wouldn’t be their nominee.

So either they are THAT stupid…. Or just that….

Deplorable?

 

[dkovic77]

Deplorable?

Weirdo…?