Silver_Arrow
Writer?
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2022
- Posts
- 737
Isn't this a contradiction?"Hurriedly moved away" feels like an understatement for a panic (which you use twice here). Overall, I think you're overdoing the adjectives and adverbs. At the same time, it feels very passive: where are the screams, the terrified parents calling for their children, that kind of thing?
A lot of what I write relies on describing outward expressions. It's how my mind pans through a scene I've written. Is it not appropriate to describe facial expressions?If you're writing close 3P, it seems odd to describe his outward expression. You're missing a comma after "furrowed" too. And it seems strange, in a panicked crowd, to have to search for threats; and "searching desperately" implies that he *wants* to find them.
see aboveIs Logan thinking that it's visible on his face too? Or otherwise aware of it? Because you're slipping out of close 3P. You have two "somethings" in close proximity. And you use a contraction here after having avoided them in the rest of the snippet.
I had to google what a pluperfect is. It's hard for my mind to think about when writing, words sort of just come out and I past vs present tense doesn't really come to mind.Referring directly to "you" (in "trying to eat you") comes across as a shortcut. "Eat every living person" or "anyone they encountered" would be more in keeping with the tone. And this seems like an experience, rather than something that's observed (as a witness). You don't need a pluperfect in "should have had to witness to", and the final "to" is superfluous.
(As with all the feedback posted here, please take it in the spirit of the thread: constructive criticism to help writers become more aware of how readers might perceive their work.)