Sexy rating scale

midwestyankee said:
Nice tits. Wanna fuck?


Where's the belly ring?
you gnawed it out last night... remember? it got caught between your teeth and we had to take you to the ER?
 
Funny I have something similar, but for guys:

They all start with 10 points, then it goes downhill

Receding hairline: - 1
No visible "package" in front: - 2
Love handles: -1
Dirty or chewed fingernails: - 1
Wrinkled clothes: - 1
Dirty shoes: - 1
Wearing a baseball cap: - 1
Wearing a t-shirt with a logo on it: - 1
Short and/or flabby: - 2

:rolleyes:
 
TBKahuna123 said:
Women can't resist geek-appeal. I got a buddy that works at Best Buy, and when he walks into the bar wearing that polyester Geek Squad jacket...unbelievable. He has to beat the ladies back with a USB drive, they're so out of control. :cool:
Geeks are hot I tell ya.
 
sxylilslut said:
Funny I have something similar, but for guys:

They all start with 10 points, then it goes downhill

Receding hairline: - 1
No visible "package" in front: - 2
Love handles: -1
Dirty or chewed fingernails: - 1
Wrinkled clothes: - 1
Dirty shoes: - 1
Wearing a baseball cap: - 1
Wearing a t-shirt with a logo on it: - 1
Short and/or flabby: - 2

:rolleyes:

what about baldness? any points taken away for being bald? even if it is bald by choice?
 
DarkLover said:
Does anybody else do this?

In an attempt to quantify scientifically why some people (women specifically) are attractive, I have developed a rating scale that I use to give points when I size up a person. (Yeah, it might be an exercise in futility, but it's a fun game to play.)

A woman gets the following points for me for the following criteria:

Good hairstyle = 1 pt
Good hair color = 1 pt
Sexy outfit = 1 pt
Exposed/visible lingerie = 1 pt
Tattoos (I love them) = 1 pt
Belly piercing = 1 pt
Heels = 1 pt
MILF = 1 pt
Athletic body type = 1 pt
Prominent sexy feature (e.g. large breasts) = 1 pt
Long fingernails = 1 pt
Painted fingernails/toenails = 1 pt
Ankle bracelet = 1 pt
Toe rings = 1 pt

Then I subtract points for other things:
Unattractive face = -1 pt
Ugly clothing = -1 pt
Too old = -1 pt
etc.

So, anybody else do this? Yeah, I know it's shallow. No, I don't seriously evaluate women based on this scale. We're talking pure sexiness at first-sight here. (And, by the way, only once have I given a woman a 10)

Dark Lover


If you guys are doing all this advanced math in your heads, I can understand why you're tongue-tied when the woman in question smiles at you or says hello. :D
 
TBKahuna123 said:
Oooo, even Dr. Schleptaquim cringes at this idea. There are some things you just can't quantify, and sexy is one of em.

Sexy isn't visible lingerie or big tits, sexy is attitude. Sexy is attitude, sexy is an aura, it's something that just oozes from a woman in a combination of sensuality and pheremones. It is existential, it is undefinable, and it is certainly unquantifiable.


What he said ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
bks8 said:
what about baldness? any points taken away for being bald? even if it is bald by choice?
lol my post was more sarcastic than anything else; I will agree with other posters and say that sexiness is more a matter of attitude, and how one carries him/herself than a hardcore list of evaluation. If the guys carries his baldness well, then it will be sexy.
 
Scalywag said:
OK, it's time to fess up folks.

Will all those that posted on this thread implying that looks had nothing to do with sexyness, then posted in the "Strange Turn Ons" thread something regarding looks that turn you on, please raise your hand (or at least remove it from your genitals for a moment). :rolleyes:

Of course, I'm assuming those things turn you on because you find them to be sexy.
Yeah, but it's already been said that those things are so subjective.

I think my hubby is really hot (and I thought my ex was attractive as well, obviously), but I'm sure that other ladies would disagree. And that's fine, because I'm keeping my hubby to myself, anyway. He's hot to me, and that's what matters.
 
Scalywag said:
I think that's exactly the point. And although the point scale thing was kind of ridiculous, if not humorous, the question he posed was based on "sexyness at first sight". It seems to me the responses posted in the "strange turn ons" thread (which I realize you did not make a post) also fit "sexyness at first sight" theme of this thread.

Just seems to me some of the posts are contradictory. :)
People contradicting themselves on Lit? Blasphemy! :D
 
Scalywag said:
I think that's exactly the point. And although the point scale thing was kind of ridiculous, if not humorous, the question he posed was based on "sexyness at first sight". It seems to me the responses posted in the "strange turn ons" thread (which I realize you did not make a post) also fit "sexyness at first sight" theme of this thread.

Just seems to me some of the posts are contradictory. :)


Well if it is the ladies who have contradicted themselves, then that is not a contradiction at all. It's just that they have changed their minds! :D
 
Scalywag said:
:D


I guess I'm just kind of sticking up for the thread starter. People kind of jumped on him (ok, maybe indirectly, and not necessarily harsh either).

I just want some justice here!!!! :D

Thanks, Scalywag, but no harm has been done. It was just intended as a ridiculous, humorous thing to being with. Besides, even when I'm goofing around with the scale, there's no point to it--I'm married, after all, so it doesn't really matter if I find another woman sexy or not.

You all did realize it was just a gag, right?

Dark Lover
 
sxylilslut said:
lol my post was more sarcastic than anything else; I will agree with other posters and say that sexiness is more a matter of attitude, and how one carries him/herself than a hardcore list of evaluation. If the guys carries his baldness well, then it will be sexy.

i hear ya. very true. but check out my dilemma...i'm going bald sorta, hair is real thin and short. i think about just shaving it all off. i think i'll look good too. but i'm hesitant. if i send you a picture, will give me honest criticism?
 
See, I will argue that to a certain extent, shallowness is acceptable -- and in fact, to a degree, we all are.

Does that mean every woman wants a <insert hot celeb guy here>? No. Nor does every man want a <insert hot celeb girl here>. What it means is, we are all attracted, visually, to a certain thing.

So what's wrong with mentally determining if we're attracted to a person? Not a damn thing. Sure, points or lists are silly, but he said in the OP that it was a silly little game he played.

There isn't a single person on this thread, or on these boards, that has never once looked at a person and found them unattractive; only someone who can honestly say that can bitch about people judging someone else's attractiveness.

So what if women are judged based on their looks? There is someone out there who will find you hot, whether or not you are stereotypically hot, so what do you care if some random guy on the street that you'll never see again is deciding if -he- thinks you're hot?

I say, make your lists, and have fun with 'em! We're all hot to someone, so go out there and find the one you think is hot! :D
 
Back
Top