NippleMuncher
Masticatus Nipplicanis
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2003
- Posts
- 4,103
Paula Deen porn!
Anybody got an ice pick, there is now an image lodged in my brain that needs removal!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Paula Deen porn!
Well, pmann is always wondering why I won't show him my girly pieces.
Paula Deen porn!
1 - Where do you draw the line between a plausible storyline and complete and total fantasy?
2 - Does the crossing of this line ruin the integrity of the story for you?
3 - Can you still enjoy a story that has pushed beyond your "bullshit" factor?
These questions are not to say that a story has to be a factual account, few are, it's just to try to find where other readers "bullshit" meter kicks in and they just can't continue reading the drivel on the page.
1. If it's a fantasy/sci fi genre, I'm willing to suspend quite a bit of belief to begin with. Remember the conversation we had about the fighting mountains in Hobbit 1?
2. If the story is based more in reality, I expect more authenticity. When all the hoopla was going on about 50 Shades, I picked up the first one to see what all the hubub was about. OMG - the dreck. Not because of the story line: I mean, while a bit out there, it's still plausible a college age miss catches the fancy of a wealthy young bachelor. What I couldn't reconcile was the fact that a supposedly modern, independent, well educated, intelligent woman could utter the words cock and dick, and yet still only have the temerity to refer to her twat as "down there." WTF?
3. I struggled through the remainder of the book because I don't like to leave things unfinished, but I did not particularly enjoy it, except to verbally shred it to those who wanted to extol it's virtues to me. *shrug*
1. If it's a fantasy/sci fi genre, I'm willing to suspend quite a bit of belief to begin with. Remember the conversation we had about the fighting mountains in Hobbit 1?
2. If the story is based more in reality, I expect more authenticity. When all the hoopla was going on about 50 Shades, I picked up the first one to see what all the hubub was about. OMG - the dreck. Not because of the story line: I mean, while a bit out there, it's still plausible a college age miss catches the fancy of a wealthy young bachelor. What I couldn't reconcile was the fact that a supposedly modern, independent, well educated, intelligent woman could utter the words cock and dick, and yet still only have the temerity to refer to her twat as "down there." WTF?
3. I struggled through the remainder of the book because I don't like to leave things unfinished, but I did not particularly enjoy it, except to verbally shred it to those who wanted to extol it's virtues to me. *shrug*
How much repression went on in that household, one must wonder, regarding the girly bits.
But 50 shades? Horrendous. The writing itself gave me gastrointestinal distress.
I do have a friend who is in her mid 50s, who is a well-educated professional woman who says dick with no problem but will NOT even refer to her snatch at all. It's like she's a barbie and she doesn't have one. (She does--I saw it when we vacationed together.) We've made a game of just trying to get her to say vagina. Couldn't do it. How much repression went on in that household, one must wonder, regarding the girly bits.
Paula Deen porn!
HOLY SHIT!!! Em, only you could find an image like that!
1. If it's a fantasy/sci fi genre, I'm willing to suspend quite a bit of belief to begin with. Remember the conversation we had about the fighting mountains in Hobbit 1?
...
1 - Where do you draw the line between a plausible storyline and complete and total fantasy?
2 - Does the crossing of this line ruin the integrity of the story for you?
3 - Can you still enjoy a story that has pushed beyond your "bullshit" factor?
These questions are not to say that a story has to be a factual account, few are, it's just to try to find where other readers "bullshit" meter kicks in and they just can't continue reading the drivel on the page.
*snip*
Question One; I have no qualms with pure fantasy. Blame Clifford, the red dog bigger than a house, who could also talk, from my childhood for that one. BUT~ it better be clear it's a fantasy from the go word AND should hang together with this alternate reality.
Question Two; It's not so much crossing a hard line drawn in the sand by me so much as a writer crossing the line they drew that will make me throw the "bullshit flag".
Oh, and Nipples? Stay away from my stories unless you're looking for examples of what not to do with yours. Just sayin'.
Clifford the Big Red Dog was real and no one will tell me otherwise! *putting fingers in ears* Lalalalalalalalalala
Clifford the Big Red Dog was real and no one will tell me otherwise! *putting fingers in ears* Lalalalalalalalalala
There's no way I'm reading badly written 7 parters. You're a better man than I.
Puckit, mate, you've just gone into a time-warp, resurrecting a four year old thread... .And just for the record, while I don't deny that the writing was bad, particularly as Acktion, I never wrote a seven-parter in any of my three iterations.
That is I never wrote a seven-parter...
Puckit, mate, you've just gone into a time-warp, resurrecting a four year old thread... .