Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
trying to relate 'abject' to this forum, it obviously relates to some fetishes as well as degradation (insofar at that's anything the bottom undergoes).
but here are a couple points, often made by roscoe and others: these areas of SM are not in the newly polished image of "it's all healthy' and 'let's all love our bodies' and 'we deeply respect one another.' further the issue of motives, comes up; some of these are not 'nice', e.g. the motive to hurt, to degrade,etc.
secondly a powerful part of the concept is its biological roots; we're wired so that some things are repellant, e.g. the universal taboos around dead bodies. so it's not a matter of reaching some sublime or jaded level where one says, yes i ate my partner's shit yesterday and it was no big deal.
as Kristeva says, the 'retching' reaction marks our encounters with some things.*
that's heavy play if one partner is made or induced to swallow something --like a quart of warm, salty piss--to the point of retching. at that point the partner can be as jaded and debonair as they like, hunched over the toilet or a pan on the floor, but they have become an abject figure. and they know that, despite the bravado.
some of this may affect the issue of 'avant garde.' artists try to push the limits, and in the last fifty years come up some powerful stuff, like bodies[replicas] on meat hooks. so in one sense, one may not be able to go further with abjection to the level of meat, then shit. Sobibor may not be surpassed; maybe one never 'surpasses' the abjected person's going up the smokestack. but the psychology of these topics, is not, and perhaps never is exhausted.
---
*it's true that people like morticians, routinely deal with dead bodies. but my guess is that that 'professionalism' is a kind of role play, distancing, automatism, etc. were that calm guy to wake up to a rotting corpse next to him, he'd freak as much as anyone else.
but here are a couple points, often made by roscoe and others: these areas of SM are not in the newly polished image of "it's all healthy' and 'let's all love our bodies' and 'we deeply respect one another.' further the issue of motives, comes up; some of these are not 'nice', e.g. the motive to hurt, to degrade,etc.
secondly a powerful part of the concept is its biological roots; we're wired so that some things are repellant, e.g. the universal taboos around dead bodies. so it's not a matter of reaching some sublime or jaded level where one says, yes i ate my partner's shit yesterday and it was no big deal.
as Kristeva says, the 'retching' reaction marks our encounters with some things.*
that's heavy play if one partner is made or induced to swallow something --like a quart of warm, salty piss--to the point of retching. at that point the partner can be as jaded and debonair as they like, hunched over the toilet or a pan on the floor, but they have become an abject figure. and they know that, despite the bravado.
some of this may affect the issue of 'avant garde.' artists try to push the limits, and in the last fifty years come up some powerful stuff, like bodies[replicas] on meat hooks. so in one sense, one may not be able to go further with abjection to the level of meat, then shit. Sobibor may not be surpassed; maybe one never 'surpasses' the abjected person's going up the smokestack. but the psychology of these topics, is not, and perhaps never is exhausted.
---
*it's true that people like morticians, routinely deal with dead bodies. but my guess is that that 'professionalism' is a kind of role play, distancing, automatism, etc. were that calm guy to wake up to a rotting corpse next to him, he'd freak as much as anyone else.
Last edited: