NemoAlia
Voracious
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2001
- Posts
- 1,434
Hey, Netzach - what's "florentine?"Netzach said:I almost shit a brick when he asked me to teach him to florentine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey, Netzach - what's "florentine?"Netzach said:I almost shit a brick when he asked me to teach him to florentine.
NemoAlia said:Hey, Netzach - what's "florentine?"
Shadowsdream said:How often in your BDSM world do Y/you encounter the Formal Dominant?
What denotes a formal Dominant to Y/you?
catalina_francisco said:In my experience, limited though it may be, there is a vast difference between the formal Dominant who commands attention through what is usually a curious mix of intellect, knowing, and a comfort with who they are, and the arrogant Dominant who often demands attention through a mix of ego, snobbery, and often loud and/or showy behaviour. The latter I have found is usually fuelled by insecurity, inexperience, and a need to be seen as superior, whereas the former IMO are fed by a peace with their own skin, experience through observation, listening, and learning...not least of all about themselves, and an ability to not really be dependent on whether those around them see them as Dominant or not as their validation is in the loyalty of those they command and befriend.
For me, this was one of the main qualities I sought as it helped me feel secure in submitting my life to them, knowing it would be respected and owned. The egocentric dominants, though they at first may appear to be in control, over time prove to be out of control and far too focused on what looks good instead of what is good, for their submissive and those around them. In other words, it was about number one first, second, last, and always, and though most Dominants will profess to come first, the formal Dominant does so with a level of responsibility toward those who place their trust in their hands.
Catalina
s'lara said:i think there is something to be said for formality. To me, a formal Dominant is someone who likes the rituals/pageantry often associated with BDSM and has enough presence of self to create and implement His/Her own practices according to Their standards.
i do believe formality should be balanced with a healthy dose of informality as it instills a sense of relaxed comfort outside of the rigid demands. Although i found comfort inside of those constrictions, a Dominant, who is willing to laugh at themselves, and keep a realistic viewpoint of the relationship, has greater appeal in my book.
lara
Shadowsdream said:...There is always hope if the seed of desire is genuine.
ethereal~minx said:I love this~ makes you think deeply about your truest intentions
no matter who you are~~
I admire you Shadowsdream.
so to sum it up, i think i had a crush on a guy over 40 years older than me.
Netzach said:If that's not what academia's good for I don't know what is.
In my world of formal Dominance, though, the girl would scurry ahead to get the door. Heh.
AvaAdore said:i think it depends on the girl
*looks at shadowsdream*
Shadowsdream said:guns?