Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've read it . Suzi, you want to eat your cake and have it too. Oh, well, I'll let you. Let Pegasus be gentle with youSuzi said:Senna Jawa has a PM waiting for him......and I let my feelings be known.
Indeed, my decades of exposure to the differential and integral calculus, and to topology, tell me that this is so.Suzi said:If I may please offer....
"And thank you _Land for your continues activity."
I think continuous would fit best here...because it covers past, present and future.
Senna Jawa said:Indeed, my decades of exposure to the differential and integral calculus, and to topology, tell me that this is so.
Talking about decades, I was once invited to a veryu straight New Year party, except that the host was a homosexual. In the door to his apartment, and this is the first time we have met, he greets me with "Happy New Year!". But it was 1989/1990, so I responded with "Happy Decade", except that I unintentionally mispronounced "decade" as "decay(d)". He had risen his brow high in surprise. Things like this happen to me.
Regards,
My gosh! I thought that it was me in this and only in this only lonely case who was sarcastic. Suzi, you cut me into slices, and slices into pieces, and you turn pieces into powder, poof! I am gone!Suzi said:
and I am just falling back on my English class grammar and common sense! I do have some, even if I am just a lowly common amateur.....(sarcasm intended)
Senna Jawa said:My gosh! I thought that it was me in this and only in this only lonely case who was sarcastic. Suzi, you cut me into slices, and slices into pieces, and you turn pieces into powder, poof! I am gone!
Indeed, Du Fu (=Tu Fu) is, East of Pacific and West of Atlantic, a very obscure poet. He is recognized as the greatest Chinese poet ever (the Chinese history of his time was restored with the help of his poems), and the Chinese poetry of his time is the strongest of all, anywhere and at any time, but he sure is obscure, the poor thing. Joseph Brodsky (USA, but originally from the USSR) was the leading (while "underground") poet of the Evil Empire, where he was called by the authorities a parasite, and send to a concentration labor camp (gulag). He was awarded a Nobel Prize for his poetry, the poor obscure thing. The other Nobel Prizes for poetry in the past quarter of 20' century went to Czeslaw Milosz (USA, but from Poland), Jaroslav Seifert (Czechoslovakia) and Wislawa Szymborska (Poland). Zbigniew Herbert by many, including myself, is considered a still greater poet than Milosz and Szymborska, but the poor, obscured thing was never awarded a Nobel, he only won several other, prestigous, international poetry awards. Boleslaw Lesmian is recognized as one of the greatest Polish poets ever, still greater than Herbert and the two Nobel winners together; by those who understand poetry, Lesmian is considerd the greatest Polish poet. In fact, in his wonderful way, he is unique in the whole world literature. BTW, as a young man Lesmian wrote a few poems in Russian. Those poems are in every serious Russian antology (Russian poetry is powerful: Pushkin, Tutchev, Lermontov, Yesenin, Mandelstam, Blok--pronounced Bwok, Achmatova, Tsvetaeva, Mayakovski, Pasternak, Brodsky...).Angeline said:you know I think one of the best things you have done for this board is introduce us to obscure poets that you love. You feel about some of them, I think, the way I feel about Lester Young: that the more I listen, the more I find in the music.
Congratulations, Angeline!I have become popular as a poet in a short time, yes.
Fortunately, you are not terribly umcomfortable with all that. And don't you dare to edit that "m" in your post!!![...] I am often very umcomfortable with the attention.
Yeah, sure, Literotica here is a place to learn all kind of (bad)habits, (wrong) ideas, and feel great about it .[...] we are all learning. Me, you, Suzi, _Land, all of us here.
Opinions are divided on this issue. According to one of the sources (_Land on Literotica), I am she or ms . Everybody is entitled to her/his opinion on Literotica.Be well mr. sj
Pasternak was awarded Nobel prize too, already in 1958, mainly for his prose, but for poetry too. Soviets forced him though to relinquish the prize. Pasternak's health was weak, which in the combination with the persecution, had contributed to his premature death.Senna Jawa said:[...] Pushkin, Tutchev, Lermontov, Yesenin, Mandelstam, Blok--pronounced Bwok, Achmatova, Tsvetaeva, Mayakovski, Pasternak, Brodsky...
Nope. Take a step back. Remember that you are NOT writing for that moron, to get even. You are a poet and you want to write something that transcendents the lousy occasion.Angeline said:Now what do you make of this poem: can it be saved? I was really angry when I wrote it.
Blues for Mister Charlie
Senna Jawa said:
Red is a striking color, it raises your adrealin and your heart beat (for obvious, survival reason--red means blood, means--be ready). But I want to downplay it, I want to play it softly (like in music), I want to keep this sunset peaceful, to keep a quiet mood, a bit on the dark side. Also, literally-visually you are already getting an ascii preview of what the next lines say. "sun" is like a jewel in the crown (without saying anything like this).
Looking back at a good poem, it is unbelievable how much (brain) intensity goes into it, how many improbable occurences contribute harmoniously to its impact (locally & globally), it's quite miraculous. And scary.Numbers stand for the age. E.g. "I 16" stands for "I, who was 16 years old"). This was one of a very few of my poems which in the past got a grand praise.Now, that's an admirable poem that everybody must love, and for good reasons . It is obvious that my poems will never be liked as widely as Angeline's.
____________________________________________________
Thanks for the explanation SJ, and for continuing to post your poems. Regards _Land
Senna Jawa said:[ .Opinions are divided on this issue. According to one of the sources (_Land on Literotica), I am she or ms . Everybody is entitled to her/his opinion on Literotica.
Best regards, [/B]
What wounds?!_Land said:
Are wounds like a fine wine that taste better with age, SJ?
Senna Jawa said:What wounds?!
_Land, c'mon, don't worry about it, it was funny.
Regards,
But I don't, I never do. Unless I am dragged into a personal exchange I stick strictly to poetry, to the issues._Land said:Some days, I swear you look for conflict.
Strange, but my very first poem was very good. Then my batting average was low for a long time, and went up very slowly. Some of my early poems make me proud today, but majority was poor. This was the result of my conflicting impressions of what poetry is about. I could feel in a few cases that I did well, while reading most of those poems after years made me blush from embarassment. Mercifully, I lost almost all of them (while I wish bad a few more of them survived).I doubt the first poem you wrote was worthy of much consideration...... You have had many years to develop your style and taste
Yes, _Land, I was happy to see in several of your poems that you've got poetic talent. But if an author treats deadly errors, which nullify their writting effort as just a minor nothing of importance, if an author feels satisfied because here and there is something interesting in his/her poem, then such an author has no chance to get anywhere. You've got to be sharp. Confident but alert to dangers.I am just in the begginning.........as are several ohters....please allow for begginers to learn and find something encouraging to say. You have admitted that some of my poetry is getting better..............I am growing. So are others.
In those cases you (and others) have a choice. You can be angry at me or... at yourself. (There is also that ostrich way too ).Your comments while sometimes very harsh to have valid points.
No problem, _Land, just tell me how many "" should I append to my jokes ._Land said:OK, I still have a hard time catching your humor
Senna Jawa said:...Strange, but my very first poem was very good. Then my batting average was low for a long time, and went up very slowly. Some of my early poems make me proud today, but majority was poor. This was the result of my conflicting impressions of what poetry is about. I could feel in a few cases that I did well, while reading most of those poems after years made me blush from embarassment...
On one hand I had my own deep feeling about poeticity, on the other I tried to understand, learn, absorb, adjust to what I read and saw around me...
I had no natural ability. I bothered people around me as much as I could. I was fortunate to always find people around me who had ear for poetry. If two of them, independently, pointed to the same flaw in my piece then I knew that it was something objective. It was not easy to get feedback in the preInternet times. (Hm, Internet is a mixed blessing, you've got to be selective, use your judgement,...).
Clock kicks in (perhaps the biological clock). In the past I was not able to write poems like I do today or recently, while today I cannot write poems as in the past, I cannot recreate my best old poems, I cannot write poems in the style of those from the past.
It is extremely important to have the ability to be deeply ashamed of what you write. When you make a "booboo", you should feel frustrated, you should feel a burning pain.
Whenever you meet a true challange, larger than yourself, you need two wings to overcome it. One wing is confidence. The other wing is FEAR. You cannot fly without the two wings being equally powerful. Imagine that you are writing a computer program guiding a cosmic rocket. If you mess up, your family inside the rocket will never come back, will freeze out out there. One tiny bug bug anywhere in your program is enough to sentence them to death, to kill them. So, be intensive, be confident in your intensity, but have that constant fear in you all the time, the fear which keeps ypu honest. Only then you have a chance for a happy end. And there are no excuses.
The same with a poem. Let FEAR be your companion, let it be the companion of your confidence. Be on guard all the time during the writing process or else you will be happy but your child-poem will be dead.
My reactions to grave blunders in poetry are adequate. It is all within the world of art. It is not about the real life or about people who happened to write those poems. It's only about them as the authors of the particular piece under the consideration. And no more.
For each muscle there should be an opposite muscle of equal strength. Thus, for instance, you should be able both to admire and to be critical. Etc.
...if an author treats deadly errors, which nullify their writting effort as just a minor nothing of importance, if an author feels satisfied because here and there is something interesting in his/her poem, then such an author has no chance to get anywhere. You've got to be sharp. Confident but alert to dangers.In those cases you (and others) have a choice. You can be angry at me or... at yourself. (There is also that ostrich way too ).
Best regards,
Senna Jawa said:Yeah, sure, Literotica here is a place to learn all kind of (bad)habits, (wrong) ideas, and feel great about it .Opinions are divided on this issue. According to one of the sources (_Land on Literotica), I am she or ms . Everybody is entitled to her/his opinion on Literotica.
Best regards,
phatcat said:
Rybka: Could/would you explain your SKY poem?
Rybka, I do not know a single person who needs this "cautioning". Do you? I don't believe there is any.Rybka said:I would only caution that creative writing (prose as well as poetry) is not computer programming
This is like saying that poets should have a balanced diet and should spent some time outdoors and exercising. All of them are useful advices.There is, or should be, a spontaneity/creativeness to what a poet writes.
One short statement and two huge errors in it. (i)There is no contradiction between spontaneity and logic just as there is no contradiction between spontaneity and high artistic level. (ii)One should not confuse boolean logic and poetic logic. Poetry has its own logic just as paintings have their own geometry.If there is not, and every word is logical and precise