serijules
just seri
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2002
- Posts
- 1,941
I feel that the intent behind an action speaks a lot louder than the action itself.
If the sub questions something over and over because s/he is genuinely confused and uneasy with it, I don't think that is topping from the bottom. I feel it should be a sign to the Dom that there is a potential problem that needs to be looked into, rather than an attempt to manipulate.
If said sub questions something over and over because s/he doesn't agree with it and wants the answer adjusted more to her liking....it's topping from the bottom, and manipulative to boot. The "you don't love me, I'm not good enough for you!" whine is another good example.
I am a playful tease...I often tease and 'pout' about something with Dom/me friends of mine...and they know I am teasing and enjoy teasing back.
Here's an example....A Domme friend requested that I bring my toys to our next meeting. I teasingly have said on a few occasions that I was not bringing the toys, and she teasingly threatened to punish me if I didn't, even wrote me a story based on me not bringing them. We both know that I will respect the request, but because of the light-hearted nature of the weekend in question, we are both enjoying bantaring about it....me 'refusing' and her 'punishing'. To many people it may look like I am manipulating her into spanking me and giving me the scene I want...but between us, it's perfectly acceptable, because we both know the intent. I know many Dom/me's would not accept that bantaring or allow it, but in this situation with this person, it is fine.
I don't think there is any set formula for determining topping from the bottom...it will vary with each person and what is acceptable to them. However, if the intent behind the action is to get what you want regardless of what the Top may feel, or to provoke the top to react...I think that's a pretty good indication. True teasing has no intentions behind it other than mutual fun and mutual laughs.
If the sub questions something over and over because s/he is genuinely confused and uneasy with it, I don't think that is topping from the bottom. I feel it should be a sign to the Dom that there is a potential problem that needs to be looked into, rather than an attempt to manipulate.
If said sub questions something over and over because s/he doesn't agree with it and wants the answer adjusted more to her liking....it's topping from the bottom, and manipulative to boot. The "you don't love me, I'm not good enough for you!" whine is another good example.
I am a playful tease...I often tease and 'pout' about something with Dom/me friends of mine...and they know I am teasing and enjoy teasing back.
Here's an example....A Domme friend requested that I bring my toys to our next meeting. I teasingly have said on a few occasions that I was not bringing the toys, and she teasingly threatened to punish me if I didn't, even wrote me a story based on me not bringing them. We both know that I will respect the request, but because of the light-hearted nature of the weekend in question, we are both enjoying bantaring about it....me 'refusing' and her 'punishing'. To many people it may look like I am manipulating her into spanking me and giving me the scene I want...but between us, it's perfectly acceptable, because we both know the intent. I know many Dom/me's would not accept that bantaring or allow it, but in this situation with this person, it is fine.
I don't think there is any set formula for determining topping from the bottom...it will vary with each person and what is acceptable to them. However, if the intent behind the action is to get what you want regardless of what the Top may feel, or to provoke the top to react...I think that's a pretty good indication. True teasing has no intentions behind it other than mutual fun and mutual laughs.