Trans Covenant School Killer Audrey Hale Manifesto Released In Full

[HisArpy]

You made incorrect conclusions based on the data. Reichy provided that source data, which simply demonstrates that you either can't read, do math or both.

It's NOT MY FAULT you can't follow directions.

 

[John_von_Neumann]

The straight line conclusion based on your statements is that, using solely the percentages and numbers you provided, every person under 30 who identifies as trans, is a school shooter.

That's not how statistics works, dummy.

 

[ll74]

It's NOT MY FAULT you can't follow directions.

The statistics don't support your narrative. And we pointed that out to both you and Reichy.

So you not understanding how your math and reading are incorrect is not my issue. Your.conclusions are not supported

 

[HisArpy]

The statistics don't support your narrative. And we pointed that out to both you and Reichy.

So you not understanding how your math and reading are incorrect is not my issue. Your.conclusions are not supported

YOU don't believe the stats support my conclusion.

That doesn't mean they don't, just that you're being obstreporous again.

This isn't my fault and you should learn to pay better attention in class.

 

[ll74]

YOU don't believe the stats support my conclusion.

The stats don't.

That doesn't mean they don't, just that you're being obstreporous again.

That they don't means that they don't.

This isn't my fault and you should learn to pay better attention in class.

Rob's post clearly lays how your conclusions are incorrect. I went even further on that.

Your percentages arent correct because those percentages differ depending on location and age. If there are 10 murders in Connecticut by 17 yr olds and you're relying on data about 40+ year olds in California....making conclusions about it is an issue.

 

[HisArpy]

The stats don't.

According to you. Yet somehow, the linked source finds that they do add up to what I'm concluding.

Ergo; YOU are the one who is wrong.

That they don't means that they don't.

Again, according to you despite what the linked source says. You're big on not reading the provided sources and instead just bull ahead with your BS nonsense. Sux to be you.

Rob's post clearly lays how your conclusions are incorrect. I went even further on that.

rubbery has problems, not the least of which is that he says quite convincingly that he doesn't lie. Like not ever.

Do the math...

Your percentages arent correct because those percentages differ depending on location and age. If there are 10 murders in Connecticut by 17 yr olds and you're relying on data about 40+ year olds in California....making conclusions about it is an issue.

Not my fault you're ignorant and refuse to elucidate yourself.

 

[RoryN]

Aw - poor Harpy. Once again, the data didn't provide him with a safe space for his hatred, and now he has to lie, deflect, and try to blame the messengers.

 

[ll74]

According to you. Yet somehow, the linked source finds that they do add up to what I'm concluding.

Ergo; YOU are the one who is wrong.


Again, according to you despite what the linked source says. You're big on not reading the provided sources and instead just bull ahead with your BS nonsense. Sux to be you.

Reichy provided the source. I'm assuming it's the same one that said 0.9% are trans and so ,1.8% shooters means double the chance.

But as pointed out - the number of younger mass shooters is higher and the percentage for younger trans is 1.8%

So not double.

rubbery has problems, not the least of which is that he says quite convincingly that he doesn't lie. Like not ever.

Do the math...

You ignoring his posts is not my issue.

Not my fault you're ignorant and refuse to elucidate yourself.

Again, the statistics don't agree with your conclusions. You can say that it's my fault all day long, but in reality, you only read as far as you needed to make your biased and incorrect conclusion. If you actually read the whole study, you'd understand that.

 

[John_von_Neumann]

The straight line conclusion based on your statements is that, using solely the percentages and numbers you provided, every person under 30 who identifies as trans, is a school shooter.

Now OBVIOUSLY that's not true. So somewhere in YOUR numbers and analytics, there's a flaw. I would suggest that it comes from your attempt to say that instead of the overall transgender population percentage being .6%, you fucked up and calculated that it's 1.4% when even your little chart says it's .52%.

So, sorry, sucks to be you.

Seriously, though, if this is what you actually think and not merely bluster, then you're mathematically illiterate.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

"I've" not had anything of the sort. Those who compile the data say that the "United States" has, but that's not the same thing.

I also disagree with those who collect the data. They tend to throw everything into one category in order to inflate the numbers. Which is bad science but since you don't really care about "teh science," and instead only care about your talking point, you're good with junk data and false conclusions.

And of course, your statement totally disregards the history of your country as it was conquered by the Europeans and completely omits the legacy of the native peoples prior to that conquest. Which you will now try to deflect from by going full rorbags and saying you only meant guns and not overall violence, or arms, or military style weapons, or whatever BS line of the day you can use to deny reality.

Have a great morning in foolsworld.

lol, you're a fucking moron.

 

[HisArpy]

Reichy provided the source. I'm assuming it's the same one that said 0.9% are trans and so ,1.8% shooters means double the chance.

But as pointed out - the number of younger mass shooters is higher and the percentage for younger trans is 1.8%

So not double.

You ignoring his posts is not my issue.

Again, the statistics don't agree with your conclusions. You can say that it's my fault all day long, but in reality, you only read as far as you needed to make your biased and incorrect conclusion. If you actually read the whole study, you'd understand that.

Rightguide wasn't the ONLY one to provide linkys.

Once again, you PROVE that you're ignorant and too lazy to change that status.

 

[ll74]

Rightguide wasn't the ONLY one to provide linkys.

Once again, you PROVE that you're ignorant and too lazy to change that status.

You did not provide a source.

And the stats don't support your conclusions