Trump: Candidates have the right to interfere with elections

If the President believes an election has been interfered with, not only should he be inclined to investigate and take steps to correct any problems, it would be his duty as President to do so.
 
The leftist of TN, KY, MT and WA for starters. Then there is all the democrat subversion of democracy because they didn't get their way. But that's all ok as long as as the POS doing it has a (D) next to their name isn't it?? LOL

Weak "BUTT BUTT JAY SIX!!!" deflection. Just say it's ok when your side does it and own your wildly obvious "Rules for thee 'progress' for me!!" bias like a big girl. Just for ONCE IN YOUR LIFE take responsibility for yourself and proudly say it with your chest that you support the left and as long as it's for the leftist utopia there is no level of brutality or oppression of "the other" you won't support.
so, remind me, which one of you that got banned a few days back is this new persona?

equally dumb, whichever one but just curious. You don't appear quite as long winded as hammy, and the others i mostly have on ignore so.... you know what? never mind; you're just not that interesting. Ignore *click*
 
If the President believes an election has been interfered with, not only should he be inclined to investigate and take steps to correct any problems, it would be his duty as President to do so.
The President has no Constitutional role to play in the election of his successor.
 
I asked you.
Not my job to educate you on Presidential duties.

All I've asserted is that if the President is convinced there is election interference (illegal and unconstitutional happenings), he most certainly should be inclined to act and it would be his duty to do so.
 
Not my job to educate you on Presidential duties.
I didnt ask for an education. I asked you to explain yours.
All I've asserted is that if the President is convinced there is election interference (illegal and unconstitutional happenings), he most certainly should be inclined to act and it would be his duty to do so.
So calling to ask for 11k votes is a mechanism?
 
You won't answer the question
I don't have to engage any tangent topic, correct.

I would arguably be obligated to defend any assertions I make, for sure. Do you dispute my assertion? Said assertion being: if the President is convinced there is election interference (illegal and unconstitutional happenings), he should be inclined and is duty bound to do something about it.
 
If the interference is on the basis of illegal and unconstitutional happenings, it most certainly would be the concern of the President.
The founding fathers correctly reasoned that if a sitting President had the power to supervise the election of his successor, an unscrupulous individual could suborn the process and remain in power indefinitely. That’s why the President has no power to enforce election law in Presidential elections.
 
I don't have to engage any tangent topic, correct.
I asked you specific questions based on your comments.

I would arguably be obligated to defend any assertions I make, for sure. Do you dispute my assertion? Said assertion being: if the President is convinced there is election interference (illegal and unconstitutional happenings), he should be inclined and is duty bound to do something about it.
I do agree that suspected fraud should be investigated by the DoJ. I expect the President would instruct them to perform those investigations.
 
If the President believes an election has been interfered with, not only should he be inclined to investigate and take steps to correct any problems, it would be his duty as President to do so.

Sir. You are in Canada. There are other members here hailing from the Great North as well but they are far more knowledgeable on American history than you.



Reagan Allies Schemed to Delay U.S. Hostages’ Freedom to Sabotage Carter, Alleged Witness Says

https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...tage-delayed-u-s-hostages-release-1234699688/

8 U.S. Intelligence Groups
Blame Russia for
Meddling, but Trump
Keeps Clouding the Picture


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...russian-interference-statements-comments.html

IMG_1525.jpeg

Notice that it’s ALL republicans.
Kindly STFU.
 
I don't have to engage any tangent topic, correct.

I would arguably be obligated to defend any assertions I make, for sure. Do you dispute my assertion? Said assertion being: if the President is convinced there is election interference (illegal and unconstitutional happenings), he should be inclined and is duty bound to do something about it.
Convinced?
By watching Faux and OAN?

Wrong. All counts.
 
The founding fathers correctly reasoned that if a sitting President had the power to supervise the election of his successor, an unscrupulous individual could suborn the process and remain in power indefinitely. That’s why the President has no power to enforce election law in Presidential elections.
None of which is relevant to my point.
 
Sir. You are in Canada. There are other members here hailing from the Great North as well but they are far more knowledgeable on American history than you.



Reagan Allies Schemed to Delay U.S. Hostages’ Freedom to Sabotage Carter, Alleged Witness Says

https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...tage-delayed-u-s-hostages-release-1234699688/

8 U.S. Intelligence Groups
Blame Russia for
Meddling, but Trump
Keeps Clouding the Picture


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...russian-interference-statements-comments.html

View attachment 2386070

Notice that it’s ALL republicans.
Kindly STFU.
I'll let you know when I give you permission to tell me what subjects and issues I can discuss. 🤭😄
 
None of which is relevant to my point.
If the interference is on the basis of illegal and unconstitutional happenings, it most certainly would be the concern of the President.
The President might be concerned, but he has no authority to act, just like the President has no authority declassify documents that Congress has classified.
 
The President might be concerned, but he has no authority to act, just like the President has no authority declassify documents that Congress has classified.
The President has final authority on classification of documents.
 
Back
Top