Tzara
Continental
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2005
- Posts
- 7,661
I don't think I have quite the relationship to visual art that you do to jazz. I love art and (classical) music, but I don't have the same obsessive yearn for my arts that you do for jazz. Your focus is something I am envious of.But I do have one more question and it's about your relationship with visual art. You know art the way I know jazz (at least it appears that way to me). Can you talk a bit about the influence of it in your poems and whether your knowledge of it affects the way you write? I know you've written poems about artists (the homage to Rauschenberg being one example), but does it effect your writing in poems that aren't specifically about an artist or work of art? (I believe there's a corollary to this in music, so I'm trying to understand how it might work with visual art).
Perhaps I just don't know enough about them (i.e., the arts that motivate me). Bogus, for example, knows way, way more about visual art than I ever will. Because he is an artist, and I am just some guy vaguely interested in art.
I think for poems, what little I understand, or am inspired by, is what influences my work. That I don't understand things at the level of the originating artist, be it Monet or Judd or Schoenberg or Daugherty, doesn't matter. They have helped me to think about things, about life. If I have thought about life (and written poems about this) in a simplistic way, then perhaps I just have a simplistic, and not artistic, view of the world.
I mean, one writes the art that one is capable of, however weak an art that is.