Maybe, looking airborne.Is that a naked woman reflected in the mirror?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe, looking airborne.Is that a naked woman reflected in the mirror?
You did say, “delicious pervert,” so it would be hard to take that as disparaging. All good - and we’re all perverts here, right?PS: I used the word "pervert" affectionately. I did not mean it disparagingly.
She's holding the ropes because she's posing as if holding reins, I believe. I'm sure I saw the poster at the Mucha Museum a few years ago. I've been looking for it on line, but no luck yet. If I find it, I'll post it here.I was wondering that myself, but on close inspection I don’t think so. From the angle of the mirror, it’s showing the rear of the studio to the right of the camera, but hard to make out any detail because of the lighting.
I have a feeling Mucha took these photos of women as references for his posters (so he wouldn’t have to have a model full-time), and we get the bonus of seeing what else he had in his studio. There’s the wall of books, a painted portrait at the far right, and I think it’s also a crucifixion painting, rather than a sculpture.
Interesting that the woman is holding straps or ropes — from her pose it doesn’t look like she’s bound. I’m curious whether there’s a matching final poster to be found.
Thank you. It can be difficult to discern tone sometimes in text. I am a Victorian fiend and as aforementioned, some of my budding sexuality in college involved risque Victorian pornography.You did say, “delicious pervert,” so it would be hard to take that as disparaging. All good - and we’re all perverts here, right?
Thanks for the early-period contribution, it’s a fine Vintage!
Agreed - the reins of a chariot or something similar. I also spent some time looking for posters based on the photos I posted, but without success. They may have been a bit risqué for the general market.She's holding the ropes because she's posing as if holding reins, I believe. I'm sure I saw the poster at the Mucha Museum a few years ago. I've been looking for it on line, but no luck yet. If I find it, I'll post it here.
When I was in high school, I bought a paperback edition of the collected issues of The Pearl, an underground Victorian erotic magazine. (I still have it tucked away somewhere.) Reading that was <ahem> educational.Thank you. It can be difficult to discern tone sometimes in text. I am a Victorian fiend and as aforementioned, some of my budding sexuality in college involved risque Victorian pornography.
Oh neat! I am familiar with it. It's been a while since I perused, though. For me, I think Jane Eyre was my first sexual awakening. Of course, it is not porn, but one could fill in the gaps...When I was in high school, I bought a paperback edition of the collected issues of The Pearl, an underground Victorian erotic magazine. (I still have it tucked away somewhere.) Reading that was <ahem> educational.
She is utter perfection. Everything, so beautiful.Ziegfeld girl Virginia Biddle
Erm, yes. *sheepish*
I thought the squire liked sheep..Erm, yes. *sheepish*
This is my ideal. When I think my ultimate fantasy...I see thisAnother Alphonse Mucha photo, with some interesting things in the background.
TissueslAll the crumpled paper on the floor.
Couldn't agree more. Very lovelyBlack has always been beautiful
Sisters? Good for them, that era seemed so simply yet erotic the 20/30Another pair of Ziegfeld girls; sisters this time.
What a collection of the very men,I know you have all been waiting for this...................