Wat’s Carbon Water-N-Stuff Thread - Concepts In Iron And Wood!!!

I don’t know, I’m kind of fond of God, as long as he is called Allah.


I am inclined to believe my own lying eyes, I can assure you.


I remember how Bill Clinton used to talk down to people, wag his finger and give them a lecture in his most sincere tone while lying through his teeth.


Like, Kathy Willey‘s tits weren’t big enough.
 
The permission structure machine that Barack Obama and David Axelrod built to replace the Democratic Party was in its essence neither modern nor conservative, though. Rather it is totalitarian in its essence, a device for getting people to act against their beliefs by substituting new and better beliefs through the top-down controlled and leveraged application of social pressure, which among other things eliminates the position of the spectator. The integrity of the individual is violated in order to further the superior interests of the superego of humanity, the party, which knows which beliefs are right and which are wrong. The party is the ghost in the machine, which appears to run on automatic pilot, using the human desire for companionship and social connection as fuel for an effort to detach individuals from their own desires and substitute the dictates of the party, which is granted the unlimited right to enforce its superior opinions on all of mankind.
That predates Obama but he advanced it further than anyone anticipated.

The good news is that the days of the "hive mind" are waning.
 
That's always been the seduction of Communism/Socialism. The individual gets the benefits without having to take responsibility for anything. Of course it really doesn't work that way but that's how it's sold.
 
In any of the -ISMs, and the problem is that to attack its dearly held principles and concepts, most of which topically are altruistic, but are cultish in result so that the rebuttal is taken by the person who holds that faith as a personal attack, i.e., you impugn their giving and caring nature. This make further discussion visceral, especially if they already deem themselves in a special victims' category and you are always the loser in the eyes of the holder of the injustice.
 
The thing is everyone of the -ism's have a down side, nothing is perfect. I just happen to reject any -ism that breeds sloth and that is exactly what Communism/Socialism do.
 
The thing is everyone of the -ism's have a down side, nothing is perfect. I just happen to reject any -ism that breeds sloth and that is exactly what Communism/Socialism do.
To me, with no value judgement, they are akin to the church, top-down solutions to salvation.
 
<-- is an Ass, not an ambulance chaser.

Please try to keep up with the rest of the class.


Pussies gonna puss. Cunts gonna cunt. And most of all, if you don’t support its lock step Kool-Aid drinking lines of spew, you aid, abet, and give aid and and comfort to the enemy, the tyrant, the traders. Flawed failed judgement, led to by the 2+2 = 264 method, and you really have to wonder.


Stupid fucking raccoon!
 
Pussies gonna puss. Cunts gonna cunt. And most of all, if you don’t support its lock step Kool-Aid drinking lines of spew, you aid, abet, and give aid and and comfort to the enemy, the tyrant, the traders. Flawed failed judgement, led to by the 2+2 = 264 method, and you really have to wonder.

Stupid fucking raccoon!
Still obsessing about pussy? You can always suck on one of your gun barrels and pretend it's Chobby.

And, my, my, my, but aren't you defensive about giving aid and comfort to the tyrant and the traders (sic)?

My words do have triggers. Who knew?
 
In any of the -ISMs, and the problem is that to attack its dearly held principles and concepts, most of which topically are altruistic, but are cultish in result so that the rebuttal is taken by the person who holds that faith as a personal attack, i.e., you impugn their giving and caring nature. This make further discussion visceral, especially if they already deem themselves in a special victims' category and you are always the loser in the eyes of the holder of the injustice.

Word salad.

If you quit smoking so much dope you might be able to make a cogent point.
 
6363be5310b3b1ca1e7f40758f20e43e.jpg
 
That's always been the seduction of Communism/Socialism. The individual gets the benefits without having to take responsibility for anything. Of course it really doesn't work that way but that's how it's sold.
Socialism is spelt "h*a*n*d*o*u*t"
 
In any of the -ISMs, and the problem is that to attack its dearly held principles and concepts, most of which topically are altruistic, but are cultish in result so that the rebuttal is taken by the person who holds that faith as a personal attack, i.e., you impugn their giving and caring nature. This make further discussion visceral, especially if they already deem themselves in a special victims' category and you are always the loser in the eyes of the holder of the injustice.
That's why it's futile to argue with a socialist.
 
Back
Top