Wat’s Carbon Water-N-Stuff Thread - Concepts In Iron And Wood!!!


[TR]
[TD]

[TR]
[TD]During the reign of Henry VII, a curious job emerged to serve the king of England: the “groom of the stool,” an attendant who helped with the monarch’s toileting. The “stool” in the title refers not to excrement, but to the “close stool,” a luxurious portable toilet that followed the king during his travels. One close stool made for Henry VIII in 1546 was trimmed in ribbon and gilt nails, and came with a leather carrying case.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]The groom was in charge of the close stool and monitoring the king’s bathroom habits, and may have even helped clean the royal bottom afterward. But it wasn’t considered a menial job — it was a prestigious position held by men of influence. Perhaps due to the intimate nature of the gig, the groom of the stool was a close royal adviser, too. Henry VII’s longtime groom Hugh Denys eventually became the king’s personal treasurer. Henry VIII’s first groom, William Compton, handled many of his personal affairs from the get-go, including arranging romantic encounters. (He eventually became fabulously rich.) Henry VIII’s final groom, Arthur Denny, even controlled his signature stamp.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]The last known groom of the stool, at least by that name, was Michael Stanhope, who worked under King Edward VI in the 16th century. The office lapsed during the reign of two female monarchs, Queen Mary and the last Tudor monarch, Queen Elizabeth I, who both had their own set of domestic staff. During the reign of the Stuarts, starting in the early 17th century, the title changed to the more polite “groom of the stole,” referring to dressing the king rather than doing his dirty work. King Edward VII eliminated the position entirely when he ascended to the throne in 1901.[/TD]
[/TR]
 
daily_gifdump-11-3.gif
 
In an era where technology is the silent pulse of our daily lives, the question of its place in our educational institutions has never been more pressing. The debate over cell phone use in Massachusetts school classrooms is not just about policy; it’s a reflection of our societal values, our educational philosophy, and our vision for the future of learning. From a centrist perspective, where we strive to balance innovation with well-being, it’s time to consider a bold move: banning cell phones from classrooms. Here’s why this policy could be the silent revolution our schools need.
Ronald Beaty

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/12/the_case_for_banning_cell_phones_in_schools.html

Not my schools and not my kids, but it sure makes a heck of a lot of sense. I somewhat think early education should oriented to paper, pencil and brain.
 
Back
Top