BrightShinyGirl
Abusive Little Bitch
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Posts
- 5,905
"Pavlov's dogs"? Sorry ... doesn't ring a bell ... .You would have to know what Pavlov's dogs actually signifies to get it. There is no sic-ing. Lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Pavlov's dogs"? Sorry ... doesn't ring a bell ... .You would have to know what Pavlov's dogs actually signifies to get it. There is no sic-ing. Lol.
Every time a Trump supporter makes this claim, I have to wonder, do they really believe it? Or do they just think repeating the lie means they're in on the con? I don't see how any educated person could really believe it's true at this point. It's beyond well-established that he's been overstating his wealth for decades, that he's lost more money than any other American ever (and maybe any human being ever), that he even managed to go broke running a casino, that what money he does have is inherited from his father, that he'd have a lot more money now if he'd just put that inheritance in the bank...I could go on, but why bother?He’s a billionaire what are you?
Among other misogynists, anyway.He was known for being a misogynist.
You need to add that he cheated his own family members.Besides the point.
He is not a self-made billionaire, rather, he inherited his family fortune, squandered most of it and acquired some of it through shady and immoral buisness dealings. Most people respect good, honest, hard working people with good morals, rather than greedy, wealthy, and immoral people.
Clinton was, deservingly, known for being sleazy and a bit of a misogynist. I'll give you that. Although, you seem to think it is perfectly okay that Trump is far worse in that regard. You always seem to have a double standard when it comes to Trump- whether it's in regard to his character, or in regards to whether the laws should apply to him or not.
"Pavlov's dogs"? Sorry ... doesn't ring a bell ... .
If there's one guy in the United States right now who needs a good security detail at least as much as former President Trump, it's Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - he has been the recipient of threats before this, and after he endorsed Donald Trump, we can expect the threats to multiply like rabbits. After Donald Trump himself, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may be the man the left hates most - maybe even more than the vice-presidential candidate, JD Vance. A Kennedy not only endorses Donald Trump but appears on stage with him - campaigning for him? That's going to set the nut squad on fire, and we've already seen what the nut squad can do when they're agitated.
You are vastly overestimating how much thought we give to RFK
You are vastly overestimating how much thought we give to RFK, not to mention conveniently ignoring which side's nut squad has most of the guns.