There is no verity of OP.
The second definition in the OP is how the word "liberal" is used in American political discourse, now and for almost a hundred years past, whatever the Brittanica might say different.
You know this to be true.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no verity of OP.
The second definition in the OP is how the word "liberal" is used in American political discourse, now and for almost a hundred years past, whatever the Brittanica might say different.
You know this to be true.
No it hasn't.
That's more representative of the last 10 years while leftist progressives have tried to hide their authoritarianism behind the label and redefine the term.
Before that liberalism was more like FDR and JFK....alt-reich adjacent by modern progressive standards.
WillJ and Laz too.
FDR was Commie by your standards
Lies and ascription.
I'm right and you know it.
I'm right and you know it. The OP is the truth.
.
Emobo must think
Again.
Academic citation > public consensus citation (wiki) > BiasWiki
You're NOT right, that's why you have to go to BiasWiki to get support. You might as well be citing alternet, RAW, Jacobin or Salon as a reliable source, it's laughable.
Well, you're wrong, and Rationalwiki says that you're wrong. RW admits that they do have a bias, although they downplay it to be "slight".RationalWiki... has no LW bias.
Additionally, it's worth noting that RationalWiki is deemed to have a slight centre-left bias compared to Wikipedia, and that's no surprise, as we explicitly do not aim for a neutral point of view. Since religious fundamentalism and far-right extremism, which RationalWiki strongly opposes, lean strongly to the right, a slight centre-left bias is to be expected as part of our mission.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki#Scope_and_statistics
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ratio...?#RationalWiki_is_not_a_neutral_point_of_view
Well, you're wrong, and Rationalwiki says that you're wrong. RW admits that they do have a bias, although they downplay it to be "slight".
I think if you read the quote, they clearly state that they are not here to be neutral and they have a left leaning bias.I should hope that nobody on this board would see a bias against "religious fundamentalism and far-right extremism" as in any way casting doubt on RationalWiki's credibility.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/11/09/beyond-red-vs-blue-the-political-typology-2/
Pew makes a distinct difference between liberals and conservatives.
RationalWiki is not Wikipedia, it has a stated bias -- towards rationality and science.
It has no LW bias.
You can lie to yourself with that bullshit all you like, I've seen otherwise.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberalism/
"Liberalism is more than one thing ..."
For an indepth examination follow this link
A great examination.of where folks go wrong...folks like Bobo.
https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/00/11/26/specials/schlesinger-debate.html?_r=1
"The liberal believes that society can and should be improved and that the way to improve it is to apply the human intelligence to social and economic problems.
The evolution of Classical liberalism to New Deal Liberalism which is the predecessor of today's Liberal/Liberalism.